IMRT with Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Plan Evaluation and Treatment Outcome

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, Jun Won [1 ]
Cho, Jae Ho [1 ]
Keum, Ki Chang [1 ]
Kim, Joo Ho [1 ]
Kim, Gwi Eon [1 ]
Lee, Jong Young [2 ]
Kim, Soo Kon [3 ]
Lee, Chang Geol [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Yonsei Canc Ctr,Severance Hosp, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Wonju Christian Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kangwondo, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kangwondo, South Korea
关键词
nasopharyngeal cancer; IMRT; simultaneous integrated boost; concurrent chemotherapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS; RADIATION-THERAPY IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; CONCOMITANT BOOST; ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; LARYNGEAL-CANCER; ADVANCED HEAD; NECK-CANCER;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hys169
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. We analyzed 53 consecutive nasopharyngeal cancer patients who received definitive treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. Forty-six patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and seven patients with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiation. The gross tumor (PTV70) received 69.96 Gy (2.12 Gy/fraction), high-risk subclinical disease (PTV60) received 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) and low-risk subclinical disease (PTV56) received 56.1 Gy (1.7 Gy/fraction) in 33 fractions. Twenty-eight patients were treated with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy and 25 patients with helical tomotherapy. Dosimetric parameters were compared between the two modalities. The median treatment duration was 49 days (range: 4165 days). The complete response rate was 92.5. Three local, two regional, one locoregional and seven distant failures were observed. With the median follow-up of 41 months (range: 889 months), the 3- and 5-year local control, locoregional control, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 91.8 and 91.8; 87.6 and 87.6; 77.5 and 70.5; and 86.4 and 82.1, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis, dermatitis, leucopenia and grade 4 leucopenia were observed in 10, 1, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. No grade 3 or higher xerostomia occurred. Helical tomotherapy significantly improved dosimetric parameters including the maximum dose, volume receiving 107 of the prescribed dose and uniformity index (D-5/D-95). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost with concurrent chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for nasopharyngeal cancer. Helical tomotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1160
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcome and toxicity after simultaneous integrated boost IMRT in head and neck squamous cell cancer patients
    Dragan, Tatiana
    Beauvois, Sylvie
    Moreau, Michel
    Paesmans, Marianne
    Vandekerkhove, Christophe
    Cordier, Lionel
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 98 : 132 - 140
  • [22] Assessment of the Performances of Four Commercial Treatment Planning Systems for Simultaneous Integrated Boost IMRT of Prostate Cancer
    Attalla E.M.
    Mokhtar M.H.
    Ahmed M.M.
    Mosallam A.S.
    Abdalgeleel S.A.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2023, 20 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [23] Image-guided IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost as per RTOG 0529 for the treatment of anal cancer
    Arcadipane, Francesca
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    Ceccarelli, Manuela
    Furfaro, Gabriella
    Rondi, Nadia
    Trino, Elisabetta
    Martini, Stefania
    Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo
    Mistrangelo, Massimiliano
    Cassoni, Paola
    Racca, Patrizia
    Morino, Mario
    Ricardi, Umberto
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (03) : 217 - 223
  • [24] Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Combined with Concurrent but not Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Nasopharyngeal Cancer - Outcome and Long-term Toxicity
    Saleh-Ebrahimi, L.
    Roeder, F.
    Timke, C.
    Zwicker, F.
    Thieke, C.
    Debus, J.
    Huber, P. E.
    Muenter, M. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S154 - S155
  • [25] Sequential versus simultaneous integrated boost IMRT for treatment of head and neck cancers
    Dogan, N
    King, S
    Emami, B
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S74 - S74
  • [26] Arterial interventional chemotherapy and IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial involvement
    Fen, Xinglai
    Qin, Weifeng
    Bao, Wuan
    Jiang, Feng
    Li, Bin
    Hu, Fujun
    Chen, Xiaozhong
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 6 (02) : 427 - 431
  • [27] Clinical outcome in patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost - intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) with and without concurrent chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal
    Tomasoa, Nathalie B.
    Meulendijks, Didier
    Nijkamp, Jasper
    Cats, Annemieke
    Dewit, Luc
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (06) : 760 - 766
  • [28] Definitive and adjuvant IMRT using simultaneous integrated boost in head and neck cancer
    Khalil, Ahmad D.
    Mose, S.
    Wust, P.
    Stromberger, C.
    Budach, V
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 : 21 - 21
  • [29] Dosimetric evaluation of different treatment techniques for breast cancer with simultaneous integrated boost
    Graydon, S.
    Lang, S.
    Verlaan, S.
    Malla, M.
    Stuessi, A.
    Zamburlini, M.
    Glanzmann, Ch
    Kloeck, S.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (08) : 755 - 755
  • [30] Treatment techniques and plan quality for breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost
    Svensson, H.
    Hallje, M.
    Chakarova, R.
    Lundstedt, D.
    Gustavsson, M.
    Karlsson, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1040 - S1041