Spatial conservation action planning in heterogeneous landscapes

被引:26
|
作者
Thomson, Jim [1 ]
Regan, Tracey J. [1 ,2 ]
Hollings, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
Amos, Nevil [1 ,3 ]
Geary, William L. [3 ]
Parkes, David [3 ]
Hauser, Cindy E. [1 ]
White, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Arthur Rylah Inst Environm Res, 123 Brown Sweet, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Dept Environm Land Water & Planning, Biodivers Strategy & Knowledge Biodivers Div, 8 Nicholson St, East Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
关键词
Conservation planning; Threat management; Cost-effectiveness; Spatial prioritisation; THREAT MANAGEMENT; PRIORITIZATION; INVESTMENT; RESOURCES; IMPACT; RETURN; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108735
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A key challenge in conservation is the efficient allocation of limited resources to maximise benefits for biodiversity. Decision-support tools that account for landscape heterogeneity are needed to identify spatially-explicit actions that will achieve the greatest biodiversity benefits with available resources. We developed a raster-based, landscape-scale, spatial conservation action planning tool (SCAP) that offers significant advances for prioritising local and regional scale conservation actions in heterogenous landscapes. The SCAP tool was developed for the state of Victoria, Australia, to integrate heterogeneity of landscapes, species distributions, threats, and management costs and benefits across the state. We used empirical data to derive current and pre-European settlement distributions for 4400 native terrestrial species, and developed spatially explicit models of 19 threats to biodiversity. We coupled structured expert-elicitation techniques with machine learning to map the expected benefits to species, and the implementation costs, of 17 management actions - alone and in combination. We then ranked location-specific actions by their cost-effective contribution to an overall objective of minimizing the risk of species loss in Victoria over the next 50 years, using a modified implementation of the Zonation conservation planning framework. The SCAP tool provides decision makers with a transparent decision-support tool for identifying the cost-effective management actions at scales relevant to management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Carnivore conservation planning on Borneo: identifying key carnivore landscapes, research priorities and conservation interventions
    Mathai, John
    Duckworth, J. W.
    Meijaard, Erik
    Fredriksson, Gabriella
    Hon, Jason
    Sebastian, Anthony
    Ancrenaz, Marc
    Hearn, Andrew J.
    Ross, Joanna
    Cheyne, Susan
    Wilting, Andreas
    [J]. RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, : 186 - 217
  • [42] Managing nature conservation prioritization: a spatial conservation planning index approach
    Lehrer, David
    Becker, Nir
    , Pua Bar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 64 (09) : 1555 - 1577
  • [43] Prioritizing actions: spatial action maps for conservation
    Tallis, Heather
    Fargione, Joe
    Game, Edward
    McDonald, Rob
    Baumgarten, Leandro
    Bhagabati, Nirmal
    Cortez, Rane
    Griscom, Bronson
    Higgins, Jonathan
    Kennedy, Christina M.
    Kiesecker, Joe
    Kroeger, Timm
    Leberer, Trina
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Mandle, Lisa
    Masuda, Yuta J.
    Morrison, Scott A.
    Palmer, Sally
    Shirer, Rebecca
    Shyamsundar, Priya
    Wolff, Nicholas H.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2021, 1505 (01) : 118 - 141
  • [44] The Value of Validated Vulnerability Data for Conservation Planning in Rapidly Changing Landscapes
    Emily Sherra Weeks
    Susan Walker
    Jake McC Overton
    Bruce Clarkson
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2013, 51 : 1055 - 1066
  • [45] Conservation planning in agricultural landscapes: hotspots of conflict between agriculture and nature
    Shackelford, Gorm E.
    Steward, Peter R.
    German, Richard N.
    Sait, Steven M.
    Benton, Tim G.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2015, 21 (03) : 357 - 367
  • [46] Conservation planning in forest landscapes of Fennoscandia and an approach to the challenge of Countdown 2010
    Mikusinski, G.
    Pressey, R. L.
    Edenius, L.
    Kujala, H.
    Moilanen, A.
    Niemelae, J.
    Ranius, T.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 1445 - 1454
  • [47] Species distribution models for conservation planning in fire-prone landscapes
    Swan, Matthew
    Le Pla, Mark
    Di Stefano, Julian
    Pascoe, Jack
    Penman, Trent D.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 30 (04) : 1119 - 1136
  • [48] Landscapes, legibility, and conservation planning: multiple representations of forest use in Panama
    Velasquez Runk, J.
    Ortiz Negria, Gervacio
    Pena Conquista, Leonardo
    Mejia Pena, Gelo
    Pena Cheucarama, Frecier
    Cheucarama Chiripua, Yani
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (03): : 167 - 176
  • [49] The Value of Validated Vulnerability Data for Conservation Planning in Rapidly Changing Landscapes
    Weeks, Emily Sherra
    Walker, Susan
    Overton, Jake McC
    Clarkson, Bruce
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 51 (05) : 1055 - 1066
  • [50] Spatial Planning and Cultural Landscapes from an Institutional Point of View
    Einig, Klaus
    [J]. RAUMFORSCHUNG UND RAUMORDNUNG-SPATIAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING, 2010, 68 (01): : 15 - 24