Spatial conservation action planning in heterogeneous landscapes

被引:26
|
作者
Thomson, Jim [1 ]
Regan, Tracey J. [1 ,2 ]
Hollings, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
Amos, Nevil [1 ,3 ]
Geary, William L. [3 ]
Parkes, David [3 ]
Hauser, Cindy E. [1 ]
White, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Arthur Rylah Inst Environm Res, 123 Brown Sweet, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Dept Environm Land Water & Planning, Biodivers Strategy & Knowledge Biodivers Div, 8 Nicholson St, East Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
关键词
Conservation planning; Threat management; Cost-effectiveness; Spatial prioritisation; THREAT MANAGEMENT; PRIORITIZATION; INVESTMENT; RESOURCES; IMPACT; RETURN; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108735
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A key challenge in conservation is the efficient allocation of limited resources to maximise benefits for biodiversity. Decision-support tools that account for landscape heterogeneity are needed to identify spatially-explicit actions that will achieve the greatest biodiversity benefits with available resources. We developed a raster-based, landscape-scale, spatial conservation action planning tool (SCAP) that offers significant advances for prioritising local and regional scale conservation actions in heterogenous landscapes. The SCAP tool was developed for the state of Victoria, Australia, to integrate heterogeneity of landscapes, species distributions, threats, and management costs and benefits across the state. We used empirical data to derive current and pre-European settlement distributions for 4400 native terrestrial species, and developed spatially explicit models of 19 threats to biodiversity. We coupled structured expert-elicitation techniques with machine learning to map the expected benefits to species, and the implementation costs, of 17 management actions - alone and in combination. We then ranked location-specific actions by their cost-effective contribution to an overall objective of minimizing the risk of species loss in Victoria over the next 50 years, using a modified implementation of the Zonation conservation planning framework. The SCAP tool provides decision makers with a transparent decision-support tool for identifying the cost-effective management actions at scales relevant to management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive responses to spatial aggregation and habitat destruction in heterogeneous landscapes
    Hancock, Peter J. F.
    Britton, Nicholas F.
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (08) : 1349 - 1376
  • [32] Detecting spatial genetic signatures of local adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes
    Forester, Brenna R.
    Jones, Matthew R.
    Joost, Stephane
    Landguth, Erin L.
    Lasky, Jesse R.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2016, 25 (01) : 104 - 120
  • [33] A spatial theory for characterizing predator - multiprey interactions in heterogeneous landscapes
    Fortin, Daniel
    Buono, Pietro-Luciano
    Schmitz, Oswald J.
    Courbin, Nicolas
    Losier, Chrystel
    St-Laurent, Martin-Hugues
    Drapeau, Pierre
    Heppell, Sandra
    Dussault, Claude
    Brodeur, Vincent
    Mainguy, Julien
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 282 (1812) : 99 - 108
  • [34] Spatial coherence and the persistence of high diversity in spatially heterogeneous landscapes
    Vikrant, Ankit
    Pettersson, Susanne
    Jacobi, Martin Nilsson
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [35] Action planning for island conservation and management in Australia
    Moro, Dorian
    Ball, Derek
    Bryant, Sally L.
    [J]. PACIFIC CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (04) : 301 - 302
  • [36] Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning
    Nielsen, Erica S.
    Beger, Maria
    Henriques, Romina
    Selkoe, Kimberly A.
    von der Heyden, Sophie
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 872 - 882
  • [37] Operations research applicability in spatial conservation planning
    Alagador, Diogo
    Cerdeira, Jorge Orestes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 315
  • [38] Action planning affects spatial localization
    Jordan, JS
    Stork, S
    Knuf, L
    Kerzel, D
    Müsseler, J
    [J]. COMMON MECHANISMS IN PERCEPTION AND ACTION, 2002, 19 : 158 - 176
  • [39] Marine Spatial Planning: A Call for Action
    Thoroughgood, Carolyn A.
    [J]. OCEANOGRAPHY, 2010, 23 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [40] SEMANTIC METADATA FOR HETEROGENEOUS SPATIAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS
    Iwaniak, A.
    Kaczmarek, I.
    Lukowicz, J.
    Strzelecki, M.
    Coetzee, S.
    Paluszynski, W.
    [J]. FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART DATA AND SMART CITIES, 30TH UDMS, 2016, 4-4 (W1): : 27 - 36