Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:82
|
作者
Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur [1 ]
Budhathoki, Pravash [2 ]
Khadka, Sitaram [3 ]
Shah, Prajwol Bikram [4 ]
Pokharel, Nisheem [5 ]
Rashmi, Prama [4 ]
机构
[1] Mangalbare Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Morang, Nepal
[2] Dr Iwamura Mem Hosp, Bhaktapur, Nepal
[3] Shree Birendra Hosp, Nepalese Army Inst Hlth Sci, Kathmandu, Nepal
[4] Nepal Med Coll & Teaching Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
[5] KIST Med Coll & Teaching Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
Antiviral agents; COVID-19; COVID-19 drug treatment; Favipiravir; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2;
D O I
10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of the drug FVP as a treatment for COVID-19. Methods Databases like Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, preprint sites, and clinicaltirals.gov were searched. The studies with the standard of care (SOC) and FVP as a treatment drug were considered as the treatment group and the SOC with other antivirals and supportive care as the control group. Quantitative synthesis was done using RevMan 5.4. Clinical improvement, negative conversion of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), adverse effects, and oxygen requirements were studied. Results We identified a total of 1798 studies after searching the electronic databases. Nine in the qualitative studies and four studies in the quantitative synthesis met the criteria. There was a significant clinical improvement in the FVP group on the 14th day compared to the control group (RR 1.29, 1.08-1.54). Clinical deterioration rates were less likely in the FVP group though statistically not significant (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.14) at the endpoint of study (7-15 days). The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups on viral clearance (day 14: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84-1.33), non-invasive ventilation or oxygen requirement (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42-1.39), and adverse effects (OR 0.69, 0.13-3.57). There are 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in different parts of the world focusing FVP for COVID-19 treatment. Conclusion There is a significant clinical and radiological improvement following treatment with FVP in comparison to the standard of care with no significant differences on viral clearance, oxygen support requirement and side effect profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dhan Bahadur Shrestha
    Pravash Budhathoki
    Sitaram Khadka
    Prajwol Bikram Shah
    Nisheem Pokharel
    Prama Rashmi
    Virology Journal, 17
  • [2] Favipiravir for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Toshie Manabe
    Dan Kambayashi
    Hiroyasu Akatsu
    Koichiro Kudo
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 21
  • [3] Favipiravir for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Manabe, Toshie
    Kambayashi, Dan
    Akatsu, Hiroyasu
    Kudo, Koichiro
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Hassanipour, Soheil
    Arab-Zozani, Morteza
    Amani, Bahman
    Heidarzad, Forough
    Fathalipour, Mohammad
    Martinez-de-Hoyo, Rudolph
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Soheil Hassanipour
    Morteza Arab-Zozani
    Bahman Amani
    Forough Heidarzad
    Mohammad Fathalipour
    Rudolph Martinez-de-Hoyo
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [6] Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sohail, Aruba
    Cheema, Huzaifa Ahmad
    Mithani, Maidah Sohail
    Shahid, Abia
    Nawaz, Ahmad
    Hermis, Alaa Hamza
    Chinnam, Sampath
    Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
    Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan
    Awan, Rehmat Ullah
    Ahmad, Sharjeel
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [7] Antiviral drug treatment for nonsevere COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Pitre, Tyler
    Van Alstine, Rebecca
    Chick, Genevieve
    Leung, Gareth
    Mikhail, David
    Cusano, Ellen
    Khalid, Faran
    Zeraatkar, Dena
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2022, 194 (28) : E969 - E980
  • [8] Favipiravir for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Naveed, Aiman
    Cheema, Huzaifa Ahmad
    Shahid, Abia
    Umer, Mohammad
    ul Hussain, Hassan
    Rehman, Mohammad Ebad Ur
    Singh, Harpreet
    Kurman, Jonathan S.
    Sahra, Syeda
    Ahmad, Faran
    Ahmad, Sharjeel
    Iqbal, Sana
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 31 (04) : e478 - e482
  • [9] Addendum: The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Soheil Hassanipour
    Morteza Arab-Zozani
    Bahman Amani
    Forough Heidarzad
    Mohammad Fathalipour
    Rudolph Martinez-de-Hoyo
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [10] Effects of Remdesivir and Favipiravir on Covid-19 Clinical Outcomes : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nazari, Seyed Saeed Hashemi
    Karimi, Roya
    Mohammadian, Maryam
    Maghsoudi, Mohammadreza
    Khani, Yousef
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2023, 10 (05): : 5701 - 5716