A multimodality segmentation framework for automatic target delineation in head and neck radiotherapy

被引:38
|
作者
Yang, Jinzhong [1 ]
Beadle, Beth M. [2 ]
Garden, Adam S. [2 ]
Schwartz, David L. [3 ]
Aristophanous, Michalis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
multimodality segmentation; Gaussian mixture model; target definition; head and neck cancer; GROSS TUMOR VOLUME; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; ACTIVE CONTOURS; PET/CT FUSION; CT; IMPACT; CANCER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4928485
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an automatic segmentation algorithm integrating imaging information from computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to delineate target volume in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Eleven patients with unresectable disease at the tonsil or base of tongue who underwent MRI, CT, and PET/CT within two months before the start of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were recruited for the study. For each patient, PET/CT and T1-weighted contrast MRI scans were first registered to the planning CT using deformable and rigid registration, respectively, to resample the PET and magnetic resonance (MR) images to the planning CT space. A binary mask was manually defined to identify the tumor area. The resampled PET and MR images, the planning CT image, and the binary mask were fed into the automatic segmentation algorithm for target delineation. The algorithm was based on a multichannel Gaussian mixture model and solved using an expectation-maximization algorithm with Markov random fields. To evaluate the algorithm, we compared the multichannel autosegmentation with an autosegmentation method using only PET images. The physician-defined gross tumor volume (GTV) was used as the "ground truth" for quantitative evaluation. Results: The median multichannel segmented GTV of the primary tumor was 15.7 cm(3) (range, 6.6-44.3 cm(3)), while the PET segmented GTV was 10.2 cm(3) (range, 2.8-45.1 cm(3)). The median physician-defined GTV was 22.1 cm(3) (range, 4.2-38.4 cm(3)). The median difference between the multichannel segmented and physician-defined GTVs was -10.7%, not showing a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.43). However, the median difference between the PET segmented and physician-defined GTVs was -19.2%, showing a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.0037). The median Dice similarity coefficient between the multichannel segmented and physician-defined GTVs was 0.75 (range, 0.55-0.84), and the median sensitivity and positive predictive value between them were 0.76 and 0.81, respectively. Conclusions: The authors developed an automated multimodality segmentation algorithm for tumor volume delineation and validated this algorithm for head and neck cancer radiotherapy. The multichannel segmented GTV agreed well with the physician-defined GTV. The authors expect that their algorithm will improve the accuracy and consistency in target definition for radiotherapy. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:5310 / 5320
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of multimodality image registration software and atlas-based automatic segmentation for delineation of organs at risk (OAR) in the brain in conformal radiotherapy (CRT)
    Isambert, A.
    Dhermain, F.
    Bidault, F.
    Bonniaud, G.
    Lery, R.
    Malandain, G.
    Commowick, O.
    Diaz, J.
    Bourhis, J.
    Lefkopoulos, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S646 - S646
  • [42] Advantages of multimodality imagery in head and neck Intensity-Modulated-Radiotherapy (IMRT)
    Valinta, D
    Gardner, M
    Alberini, J
    Plantet, M
    Labib, A
    Halimi, P
    Hans, S
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S190 - S191
  • [43] Toward a Machine Learning Based Framework for Improved Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck: A Single Institution Implementation
    Asbach, J. C.
    Matott, L. S.
    Singh, A. K.
    Le, A. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E379 - E379
  • [44] Head-and-neck tumor delineation for MRI guided adaptive (chemo)radiotherapy
    Philippens, M.
    Peltenburg, B.
    Doornaert, P.
    Pameijer, F.
    Kotte, A.
    De Bree, R.
    Terhaard, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S919 - S919
  • [45] Does contrast aid delineation of targets for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (HNC)?
    De Silva, S.
    Waldron, J.
    Norman, A.
    Cummings, B.
    Dawson, L.
    Keller, A.
    Ringash, J.
    Yu, E.
    Sullivan, B. O.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S262 - S263
  • [46] Semi-Automatic Multi-Modality Image Segmentation for Normal Organ Delineation in Head & Neck Radiation Treatment Planning
    Hu, Y.
    Grossberg, M.
    Mageras, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [47] Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Tumor: How Powerful Transformers Are?
    Sobirov, Ikboljon
    Nazarov, Otabek
    Alasmawi, Hussain
    Yaqub, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL IMAGING WITH DEEP LEARNING, VOL 172, 2022, 172 : 1149 - 1161
  • [48] Automatic segmentation using atlases in head and neck cancers: Methodology
    Ramus, L.
    Thariat, J.
    Marcy, P. -Y.
    Pointreau, Y.
    Bera, G.
    Commowick, O.
    Malandain, G.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2010, 14 (03): : 206 - 212
  • [49] FULLY AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF BRAIN, HEAD AND NECK, AND PELVIS OAR
    Guimond, A.
    Bondiau, P. Y.
    Commowick, O.
    Gregoire, V.
    Costa, J.
    Delingette, H.
    Isambert, A.
    Ruaud, J. B.
    Malandain, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S123 - S124
  • [50] Automatic delineation of head and neck gross tumor volume using multimodal information
    Bollen, H.
    Nuyts, S.
    Willems, S.
    Maes, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S775 - S776