A multimodality segmentation framework for automatic target delineation in head and neck radiotherapy

被引:38
|
作者
Yang, Jinzhong [1 ]
Beadle, Beth M. [2 ]
Garden, Adam S. [2 ]
Schwartz, David L. [3 ]
Aristophanous, Michalis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
multimodality segmentation; Gaussian mixture model; target definition; head and neck cancer; GROSS TUMOR VOLUME; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; ACTIVE CONTOURS; PET/CT FUSION; CT; IMPACT; CANCER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4928485
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an automatic segmentation algorithm integrating imaging information from computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to delineate target volume in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Eleven patients with unresectable disease at the tonsil or base of tongue who underwent MRI, CT, and PET/CT within two months before the start of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were recruited for the study. For each patient, PET/CT and T1-weighted contrast MRI scans were first registered to the planning CT using deformable and rigid registration, respectively, to resample the PET and magnetic resonance (MR) images to the planning CT space. A binary mask was manually defined to identify the tumor area. The resampled PET and MR images, the planning CT image, and the binary mask were fed into the automatic segmentation algorithm for target delineation. The algorithm was based on a multichannel Gaussian mixture model and solved using an expectation-maximization algorithm with Markov random fields. To evaluate the algorithm, we compared the multichannel autosegmentation with an autosegmentation method using only PET images. The physician-defined gross tumor volume (GTV) was used as the "ground truth" for quantitative evaluation. Results: The median multichannel segmented GTV of the primary tumor was 15.7 cm(3) (range, 6.6-44.3 cm(3)), while the PET segmented GTV was 10.2 cm(3) (range, 2.8-45.1 cm(3)). The median physician-defined GTV was 22.1 cm(3) (range, 4.2-38.4 cm(3)). The median difference between the multichannel segmented and physician-defined GTVs was -10.7%, not showing a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.43). However, the median difference between the PET segmented and physician-defined GTVs was -19.2%, showing a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.0037). The median Dice similarity coefficient between the multichannel segmented and physician-defined GTVs was 0.75 (range, 0.55-0.84), and the median sensitivity and positive predictive value between them were 0.76 and 0.81, respectively. Conclusions: The authors developed an automated multimodality segmentation algorithm for tumor volume delineation and validated this algorithm for head and neck cancer radiotherapy. The multichannel segmented GTV agreed well with the physician-defined GTV. The authors expect that their algorithm will improve the accuracy and consistency in target definition for radiotherapy. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:5310 / 5320
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Head and neck target delineation using a novel PET automatic segmentation algorithm
    Berthon, B.
    Evans, M.
    Marshall, C.
    Palaniappan, N.
    Cole, N.
    Jayaprakasam, V.
    Rackley, T.
    Spezi, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 122 (02) : 242 - 247
  • [2] Imaging for Target Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy
    Jensen, Kenneth
    Al-Farra, Gina
    Dejanovic, Danijela
    Eriksen, Jesper G.
    Loft, Annika
    Hansen, Christian R.
    Pameijer, Frank A.
    Zukauskaite, Ruta
    Grau, Cai
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [3] Multimodality Segmentation of Head and Neck Tumors
    Aristophanous, M.
    Yang, J.
    Beadle, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 209 - 209
  • [4] DENTALMAPS: AUTOMATIC DENTAL DELINEATION FOR RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING IN HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Thariat, Juliette
    Ramus, Liliane
    Maingon, Philippe
    Odin, Guillaume
    Gregoire, Vincent
    Darcourt, Vincent
    Guevara, Nicolas
    Orlanducci, Marie-Helene
    Marcie, Serge
    Poissonnet, Gilles
    Marcy, Pierre-Yves
    Bozec, Alex
    Dassonville, Olivier
    Castillo, Laurent
    Demard, Francois
    Santini, Jose
    Malandain, Gregoire
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05): : 1858 - 1865
  • [5] Target volume delineation for head and neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Lapeyre, M.
    Toledano, I.
    Bourry, N.
    Bailly, C.
    Cachin, F.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2011, 15 (6-7): : 466 - 472
  • [6] An integrated region/edge framework for multimodality target delineation
    Wasserman, R
    Acharya, R
    Sibata, C
    Shin, KH
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1996: IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 2710 : 264 - 275
  • [7] Balancing Risk and Reward in Target Delineation for Highly Conformal Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Gregoire, Vincent
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [8] Use of auto-segmentation in the delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in head and neck
    Lim, Jia Yi
    Leech, Michelle
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (07) : 799 - 806
  • [9] Impact of Neuroradiology-Based Peer Review on Head and Neck Radiotherapy Target Delineation
    Braunstein, S.
    Glastonbury, C. M.
    Chen, J.
    Quivey, J. M.
    Yom, S. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (01) : 146 - 153
  • [10] Anatomical atlas in the context of head and neck radiotherapy and its use to automatic segmentation
    Parraga, Adriane
    Macq, Benoit
    De Craene, Mathieu
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2012, 7 (05) : 447 - 455