A practical approach to communicating benefit-risk decisions of medicines to stakeholders

被引:6
|
作者
Leong, James [1 ]
Walker, Stuart [2 ]
Salek, Sam [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Ctr Regulatory Excellence, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Ctr Innovat Regulatory Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Sch Life & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[4] Inst Med Dev, Cardiff CF23 6NP, S Glam, Wales
来源
关键词
benefit-risk assessment; benefit-risk methodologies; pharmaceutical industry; regulatory agency; framework; documentation;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2015.00099
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: The importance of a framework for a systematic structured assessment of the benefits and risks has been established, but in addition, it is necessary that the benefit-risk decisions and the processes to derive those decisions are documented and communicated to various stakeholders for accountability. Hence there is now a need to find appropriate tools to enhance communication between regulators and other stakeholders, in a manner that would uphold transparency, consistency and standards. Methods: A retrospective, non-comparative study was conducted to determine the applicability and practicality of a summary template in documenting benefit-risk assessment and communicating benefit-risk balance and conclusions for reviewers to other stakeholders. The benefit-risk (BR) Summary Template and its User Manual was evaluated by 12 reviewers within a regulatory agency in Singapore, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA). Results: The BR Summary Template was found to be adequate in documenting benefits, risks, relevant summaries and conclusions, while the User Manual was useful in guiding the reviewer in completing the template. The BR Summary Template was also considered a useful tool for communicating benefit-risk decisions to a variety of stakeholders. Conclusions: The use of a template may be of value for the communicating benefit-risk assessment of medicines to stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Experience of a Consortium of Medium-Sized Regulatory Authorities
    Neil McAuslane
    James Leong
    Lawrence Liberti
    Stuart Walker
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2017, 51 : 635 - 644
  • [42] Benefit-risk measurment approach for customer collaboration of product innovation
    Zhang X.
    Yang Y.
    Su J.
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2016, 22 (03): : 639 - 649
  • [43] Refining the Benefit-Risk Framework for the Assessment of Medicines: Valuing and Weighting Benefit and Risk Parameters (vol 89, pg 179, 2011)
    Walker, S.
    Liberti, L.
    McAuslane, N.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 89 (06) : 928 - 928
  • [44] COSMETIC LEGISLATION - BENEFIT-RISK
    KLEINFELD, V
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION, 1974, 29 (07) : 306 - 309
  • [45] Stakeholders, decisions and risk
    Pidgeon, N
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 1583 - 1588
  • [46] Practical Considerations and Approaches for Emerging Issues in Benefit-risk Assessment of Medical Products
    He, Weili
    Chan, Ivan
    Jiang, Qi
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 8 (04): : 365 - 365
  • [47] Benefit-risk assessment of vaccines
    Kochhar, Sonali
    Izurieta, Hector S.
    Chandler, Rebecca E.
    Hacker, Adam
    Chen, Robert T.
    Levitan, Bennett
    VACCINE, 2024, 42 (04) : 969 - 971
  • [48] COSMETIC LEGISLATION - BENEFIT-RISK
    KLEINFEL.V
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 1974, 29 (06): : 308 - 315
  • [49] Estimand in benefit-risk assessment
    Ren, Xinru
    Chen, X. Gregory
    Seifu, Yodit
    Wang, William
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2023, 33 (04) : 452 - 465
  • [50] DDT BENEFIT-RISK EQUATION
    WRIGHT, JOB
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1970, 48 (10) : 7 - &