A practical approach to communicating benefit-risk decisions of medicines to stakeholders

被引:6
|
作者
Leong, James [1 ]
Walker, Stuart [2 ]
Salek, Sam [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Ctr Regulatory Excellence, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Ctr Innovat Regulatory Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Sch Life & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[4] Inst Med Dev, Cardiff CF23 6NP, S Glam, Wales
来源
关键词
benefit-risk assessment; benefit-risk methodologies; pharmaceutical industry; regulatory agency; framework; documentation;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2015.00099
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: The importance of a framework for a systematic structured assessment of the benefits and risks has been established, but in addition, it is necessary that the benefit-risk decisions and the processes to derive those decisions are documented and communicated to various stakeholders for accountability. Hence there is now a need to find appropriate tools to enhance communication between regulators and other stakeholders, in a manner that would uphold transparency, consistency and standards. Methods: A retrospective, non-comparative study was conducted to determine the applicability and practicality of a summary template in documenting benefit-risk assessment and communicating benefit-risk balance and conclusions for reviewers to other stakeholders. The benefit-risk (BR) Summary Template and its User Manual was evaluated by 12 reviewers within a regulatory agency in Singapore, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA). Results: The BR Summary Template was found to be adequate in documenting benefits, risks, relevant summaries and conclusions, while the User Manual was useful in guiding the reviewer in completing the template. The BR Summary Template was also considered a useful tool for communicating benefit-risk decisions to a variety of stakeholders. Conclusions: The use of a template may be of value for the communicating benefit-risk assessment of medicines to stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementing Benefit-Risk Assessment for the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
    Margaret R. Warner
    Anne M. Wolka
    Rebecca A. Noel
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2016, 50 : 342 - 346
  • [22] International Experiences in Quantitative Benefit-Risk Analysis to Support Regulatory Decisions
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Lavezzari, Gabriela
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (06) : 727 - 729
  • [23] Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers
    Morel, T.
    Ayme, S.
    Cassiman, D.
    Simoens, S.
    Morgan, M.
    Vandebroek, M.
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2016, 11
  • [24] BENEFIT-RISK RATIO
    TICE, LF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 1977, 149 (02): : 35 - 36
  • [25] Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers
    T. Morel
    S. Aymé
    D. Cassiman
    S. Simoens
    M. Morgan
    M. Vandebroek
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 11
  • [26] Is there a need for a universal benefit-risk assessment framework for medicines? Regulatory and industry perspectives
    Leong, James
    McAuslane, Neil
    Walker, Stuart
    Salek, Sam
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 (09) : 1004 - 1012
  • [27] BENEFIT-RISK EQUATION
    SCHMIDT, AM
    FDA CONSUMER, 1974, 8 (04) : 27 - 31
  • [28] BENEFIT-RISK OF POLLUTION
    HEDMAN, FA
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1970, 48 (29) : 7 - &
  • [29] Prescribers' compliance is part of benefit-risk assessment of medicines and it can lead to failure of risk minimization measures and withdrawals of medicines
    Puljak, Livia
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [30] A Comprehensive Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment in Drug Development
    Sarac, Sinan B.
    Rasmussen, Christian H.
    Rasmussen, Morten A.
    Hallgreen, Christine E.
    Soeborg, Tue
    Colding-Jorgensen, Morten
    Christensen, Per K.
    Thirstrup, Steffen
    Mosekilde, Erik
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 111 (01) : 65 - 72