Brazilian Portuguese version of the Headache Disability Inventory: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability

被引:5
|
作者
Pradela, Juliana [1 ]
Bevilaqua-Grossi, Debora [1 ]
Cristina Chaves, Thais [1 ]
Dach, Fabiola [2 ]
Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Hlth Sci, Ave Bandeirantes 3900, BR-14048900 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Neurosci & Behav Sci, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
关键词
Disability evaluation; headache; quality of life; psychometrics; surveys and questionnaires; HEALTH SURVEY; MIGRAINE; IMPACT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0333102420949860
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Headache Disability Inventory assesses the dimensions of headache disability, but it is not available in Brazilian Portuguese yet. We aimed to translate the Headache Disability Inventory into Brazilian Portuguese and analyze its measurement properties. Methods Consecutive patients with headaches diagnosed by expert neurologists as per the International Classification of Headache Disorders were included. For the cross-cultural adaptation, 30 individuals answered the translated Headache Disability Inventory version. The internal consistency was evaluated, and the structural validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis. For the construct validity assessment, 132 individuals answered the Headache Disability Inventory-Brazil, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). After 1-3 weeks, 67 individuals again answered the Headache Disability Inventory-Brazil for the reliability assessment. The Pearson's correlation test, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement were analyzed. Results The pre-stage version of the questionnaire was considered as the final version. The Headache Disability Inventory-Brazil had an internal consistency of 0.84 and consisted of a functional, emotional and social participation domain (factor loads > 0.3). The internal consistency ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 for each of the three domains. For the construct validity, the Headache Disability Inventory-Brazil presented moderate correlation with the SF-12 (r = -0.70,p < 0.05) and with the HIT-6 (r = 0.67,p <= 0.05). Its test-retest reliability was considered to be excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95) and the standard error of measurement was 2.26 points. Conclusion The Headache Disability Inventory-Brazil was successfully translated and culturally adapted to the Brazilian population. It can be used for the impact assessment of primary and secondary headaches with validity and reliability equivalent to its original version.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 165
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the oswestry disability index - Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity
    Vigatto, Ricardo
    Costa Alexandre, Neusa Maria
    Correa Filho, Heleno Rodrigues
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (04) : 481 - 486
  • [2] Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory: Cross-Cultural Reliability, Internal Consistency, and Construct and Structural Validity
    Greghi, Stella Maris
    Aguiar, Aroldo dos Santos
    Bataglion, Cesar
    Ferracini, Gabriela Natalia
    La Touche, Roy
    Chaves, Thais Cristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL & FACIAL PAIN AND HEADACHE, 2018, 32 (04) : 389 - 399
  • [3] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the 'Fit to Dance?' survey
    Panosso, Isabela
    Picon, Andreja
    Figueiredo, Valeria
    Gomes, Vitoria
    Sanchez, Erin
    Wyon, Matthew
    Haas, Aline Nogueira
    Bittar, Adriano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2024, 39 : 594 - 597
  • [4] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI/T) in patients with cervicogenic headache
    Kilinc, Hasan Erkan
    Oz, Muzeyyen
    Berberoglu, Utku
    Asliyuce, Yasemin Ozel
    Onan, Dilara
    Fanuscu, Aybueke
    Ulger, Ozlem
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (04) : 820 - 827
  • [5] Cross-cultural adaptation of the Amsterdam inventory for auditory disability and handicap to Brazilian Portuguese
    Zanchetta, Sthella
    Simoes, Humberto Oliveira
    Lunardelo, Pamela Papile
    Canavezi, Marina de Oliveira
    Mirandola Barbosa Reis, Ana Claudia
    Massuda, Eduardo Tanaka
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 86 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [6] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of Activity Scale for Kids questionnaire
    de Oliveira, Vanessa Goncalves Coutinho
    Balau, Laura Cardoso
    Arrebola, Lucas Simoes
    Young, Nancy Lynn
    Yi, Liu Chiao
    [J]. CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 49 (04) : 725 - 731
  • [7] The Brazilian Portuguese version of the ICIQ-OABqol: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability
    Monteiro, Silvia
    Riccetto, Cassio
    Rocha, Anna Karoline
    Santos, Kamila
    Campos, Ingrid
    Pereira, Tuany
    Botelho, Simone
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (12) : 2507 - 2514
  • [8] The Brazilian Portuguese version of the ICIQ-OABqol: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability
    Silvia Monteiro
    Cássio Riccetto
    Anna Karoline Rocha
    Kamila Santos
    Ingrid Campos
    Tuany Pereira
    Simone Botelho
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 2507 - 2514
  • [9] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Brief Norwegian Safety Climate Inventory (Brief NORSCI)
    Monteiro, Raquel
    Silva, Manuela V.
    Arezes, Pedro
    Rodrigues, Matilde A.
    [J]. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S333 - S333
  • [10] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Italian version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire
    Brindisino, Fabrizio
    Pellicciari, Leonardo
    Lorusso, Mariangela
    Pennella, Denis
    Padua, Roberto
    Di Bari, Mauro
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 46