Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing assay for the clinical genetic screening of CFTR

被引:15
|
作者
Trujillano, Daniel [1 ]
Weiss, Maximilian E. R. [1 ]
Koester, Julia [1 ]
Papachristos, Efstathios B. [1 ]
Werber, Martin [1 ]
Kandaswamy, Krishna Kumar [1 ]
Marais, Anett [1 ]
Eichler, Sabrina [1 ]
Creed, Jenny [1 ]
Baysal, Erol [2 ]
Jaber, Iqbal Yousuf [2 ]
Mehaney, Dina Ahmed [3 ]
Farra, Chantal [4 ]
Rolfs, Arndt [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Centogene AG, Schillingallee 68, D-18257 Rostock, Germany
[2] Dubai Hlth Author, Dubai Genet & Thalassemia Ctr, Pathol & Genet Dept, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[3] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Clin & Chem Pathol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Amer Univ Beirut Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] Med Univ Rostock, Albrecht Kossel Inst Neuroregen, Rostock, Germany
来源
关键词
CFTR; cystic fibrosis; Ion Torrent; molecular; diagnostics; next-generation sequencing; validation;
D O I
10.1002/mgg3.149
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genetic testing for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders mostly relies on laborious molecular tools that use Sanger sequencing to scan for mutations in the CFTR gene. We have explored a more efficient genetic screening strategy based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the CFTR gene. We validated this approach in a cohort of 177 patients with previously known CFTR mutations and polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was amplified using the Ion AmpliSeq TM CFTR panel. The DNA libraries were pooled, barcoded, and sequenced using an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer. The combination of different robust bioinformatics tools allowed us to detect previously known pathogenic mutations and polymorphisms in the 177 samples, without detecting spurious pathogenic calls. In summary, the assay achieves a sensitivity of 94.45% (95% CI: 92% to 96.9%), with a specificity of detecting nonvariant sites from the CFTR reference sequence of 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%), and a negative predictive value of 99.99% (95% CI: 99.99% to 100%). In addition, we describe the observed allelic frequencies of 94 unique definitely and likely pathogenic, uncertain, and neutral CFTR variants, some of them not previously annotated in the public databases. Strikingly, a seven exon spanning deletion as well as several more technically challenging variants such as pathogenic poly-thymidine-guanine and poly-thymidine (poly-TG-T) tracts were also detected. Targeted NGS is ready to substitute classical molecular methods to perform genetic testing on the CFTR gene.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 403
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles
    Fiorentino, Francesco
    Bono, Sara
    Biricik, Anil
    Nuccitelli, Andrea
    Cotroneo, Ettore
    Cottone, Giuliano
    Kokocinski, Felix
    Michel, Claude-Edouard
    Minasi, Maria Giulia
    Greco, Ermanno
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (12) : 2802 - 2813
  • [42] Genetic mutation of familial dilated cardiomyopathy based on next-generation semiconductor sequencing
    Lin, Xin-Fu
    Luo, Jie-Wei
    Liu, Gui
    Zhu, Yao-Bin
    Jin, Zhao
    Lin, Xing
    [J]. MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2018, 18 (05) : 4271 - 4280
  • [43] The Clinical Validation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Lymphoid Malignancies
    Artymiuk, C.
    Basu, S.
    Koganti, T.
    Tandale, P.
    Balan, J.
    Dina, M.
    Fritcher, E. Barr
    Wu, X.
    Ashworth, T.
    He, R.
    Viswanatha, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 25 (11): : S45 - S45
  • [44] Comprehensive Validation of Cytology Samples for Downstream Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Sidiropoulos, N.
    Hampel, K. J.
    Anderson, S. R.
    Schwartz, M.
    Gibson, P. C.
    Giroux, S.
    Leiman, G.
    Balla, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 17 (06): : 844 - 845
  • [45] Clinical Validation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Lymphoid Malignancies
    Artymiuk, Cody J.
    Basu, Shubham
    Koganti, Tejaswi
    Tandale, Pratyush
    Balan, Jagadheshwar
    Dina, Michelle A.
    Fritcher, Emily G. Barr
    Wu, Xianglin
    Ashworth, Taylor
    He, Rong
    Viswanatha, David S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 26 (07): : 583 - 598
  • [46] Next-generation Sequencing Aids in the Identification of a Rare CFTR Deletion
    Boczek, N. J.
    Roellinger, S.
    Mills, J.
    Koellner, C.
    Hasadsri, L.
    Highsmith, W.
    Rumilla, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (06): : 1032 - 1032
  • [47] Next-generation sequencing in clinical microbiology
    Wain, John
    Mavrogiorgou, Eleni
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 13 (03) : 225 - 227
  • [48] Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Yohe, Sophia
    Thyagarajan, Bharat
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 141 (11) : 1544 - 1557
  • [49] The Uncertainties of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Pasic, Maria D.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 64 (03) : 616 - 617
  • [50] Next-Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics
    Jacob, Howard J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (16): : 1557 - 1558