Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing assay for the clinical genetic screening of CFTR

被引:15
|
作者
Trujillano, Daniel [1 ]
Weiss, Maximilian E. R. [1 ]
Koester, Julia [1 ]
Papachristos, Efstathios B. [1 ]
Werber, Martin [1 ]
Kandaswamy, Krishna Kumar [1 ]
Marais, Anett [1 ]
Eichler, Sabrina [1 ]
Creed, Jenny [1 ]
Baysal, Erol [2 ]
Jaber, Iqbal Yousuf [2 ]
Mehaney, Dina Ahmed [3 ]
Farra, Chantal [4 ]
Rolfs, Arndt [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Centogene AG, Schillingallee 68, D-18257 Rostock, Germany
[2] Dubai Hlth Author, Dubai Genet & Thalassemia Ctr, Pathol & Genet Dept, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[3] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Clin & Chem Pathol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Amer Univ Beirut Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] Med Univ Rostock, Albrecht Kossel Inst Neuroregen, Rostock, Germany
来源
关键词
CFTR; cystic fibrosis; Ion Torrent; molecular; diagnostics; next-generation sequencing; validation;
D O I
10.1002/mgg3.149
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genetic testing for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders mostly relies on laborious molecular tools that use Sanger sequencing to scan for mutations in the CFTR gene. We have explored a more efficient genetic screening strategy based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the CFTR gene. We validated this approach in a cohort of 177 patients with previously known CFTR mutations and polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was amplified using the Ion AmpliSeq TM CFTR panel. The DNA libraries were pooled, barcoded, and sequenced using an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer. The combination of different robust bioinformatics tools allowed us to detect previously known pathogenic mutations and polymorphisms in the 177 samples, without detecting spurious pathogenic calls. In summary, the assay achieves a sensitivity of 94.45% (95% CI: 92% to 96.9%), with a specificity of detecting nonvariant sites from the CFTR reference sequence of 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%), and a negative predictive value of 99.99% (95% CI: 99.99% to 100%). In addition, we describe the observed allelic frequencies of 94 unique definitely and likely pathogenic, uncertain, and neutral CFTR variants, some of them not previously annotated in the public databases. Strikingly, a seven exon spanning deletion as well as several more technically challenging variants such as pathogenic poly-thymidine-guanine and poly-thymidine (poly-TG-T) tracts were also detected. Targeted NGS is ready to substitute classical molecular methods to perform genetic testing on the CFTR gene.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 403
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ISO 17025 validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for relationship testing
    Buchard, Anders
    Kampmann, Marie-Louise
    Poulsen, Lena
    Borsting, Claus
    Morling, Niels
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2016, 37 (21) : 2822 - 2831
  • [22] Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing assay specifically for blood-drop liquid biopsy
    Yeh, Chen-Hsiung
    Spurgin, Jonathan
    Ford, Andrew
    Athanasuleas, John
    Manne, Upender
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [23] Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing assay for respiratory virus detection and discovery
    Tan, Jessica Karielle
    Servellita, Venice
    Stryke, Doug
    Kelly, Emily
    Streithorst, Jessica
    Sumimoto, Nanami
    Foresythe, Abiodun
    Huh, Hee Jae
    Nguyen, Jenny
    Oseguera, Miriam
    Brazer, Noah
    Tang, Jack
    Ingebrigtsen, Danielle
    Fung, Becky
    Reyes, Helen
    Hillberg, Melissa
    Chen, Alice
    Guevara, Hugo
    Yagi, Shigeo
    Morales, Christina
    Wadford, Debra A.
    Mourani, Peter M.
    Langelier, Charles R.
    de Lorenzi-Tognon, Mikael
    Benoit, Patrick
    Chiu, Charles Y.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [24] Validation of Alternative Pre-Stained Cytology Specimens for a Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Assay
    He, Xin
    Uzun, Ece
    Jackson, Cynthia
    Pisharodi, Latha
    Patel, Nimesh R.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 148 - 148
  • [25] Validation of Alternative Pre-Stained Cytology Specimens for a Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Assay
    He, Xin
    Uzun, Ece
    Jackson, Cynthia
    Pisharodi, Latha
    Patel, Nimesh R.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 148 - 148
  • [26] Can Next-Generation Sequencing Replace Sanger Sequencing for Screening Genetic Variants?
    Kawashiri, Masa-aki
    Nomura, Akihiro
    Konno, Tetsuo
    Hayashi, Kenshi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (12) : 2845 - 2847
  • [27] Clinical validation of targeted next-generation sequencing for glioblastoma patients
    Trepant, Anne-Laure
    Le Mercier, Marie
    Maris, Calliope
    De Neve, Nancy
    Blanchard, Oriane
    D'Haene, Nicky
    Salmon, Isabelle
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [28] Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Validation: Review of Findings
    Peterson, L. M.
    Blommel, J. H.
    Fadra, N.
    Tu, Z.
    Klee, E. W.
    Ferber, M. J.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 848 - 848
  • [29] Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing-based protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of reciprocal translocations
    Bono, S.
    Biricik, A.
    Spizzichino, L.
    Nuccitelli, A.
    Minasi, M. G.
    Greco, E.
    Spinella, F.
    Fiorentino, F.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (10) : 938 - 944
  • [30] Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing panel for clinical pharmacogenetics
    Ramudo-Cela, Luis
    Maria Lopez-Marti, Jesos
    Colmeiro-Echeberria, Daniel
    de-Una-Iglesias, David
    Luis Santome-Collazo, Jose
    Monserrat-lglesias, Lorenzo
    FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA, 2020, 44 (06) : 243 - 253