Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery

被引:73
|
作者
Vieira, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Rendon, Gabriel J. [2 ]
Munsell, Mark [3 ]
Echeverri, Lina [2 ]
Frumovitz, Michael [4 ]
Schmeler, Kathleen M. [4 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
Escobar, Pedro F. [4 ]
dos Reis, Ricardo [1 ]
Ramirez, Pedro T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Inst Cancerol Las Amer, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
FERTILITY; OUTCOMES; CARCINOMA; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. Radical trachelectomy is considered standard of care in patients with early-stage cervical cancer interested in future fertility. The goal of this study was to compare operative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of patients from four institutions who underwent radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer from June 2002 to July 2013. Perioperative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes were compared between patients undergoing open vs. minimally invasive surgery. Results. A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-eight patients underwent open radical trachelectomy and 42 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS = laparoscopic or robotic). There were no differences in patient age, body mass index, race, histology, lymph vascular space invasion, or stage between the two groups. The median surgical time for MIS was 272 min [range, 130-441 min] compared with 270 min [range, 150-373 min] for open surgery (p = 0.78). Blood loss was significantly lower for MIS vs. laparotomy (50 mL [range, 10-225 mL] vs. 300 mL [50-1100 mL]) (p <0.0001). Nine patients required blood transfusion, all in the open surgery group (p = 0.010). Length of hospitalization was shorter for MIS than for laparotomy (1 day [1-3 days] vs. 4 days [1-9 days]) (p <0.0001). Three intraoperative complications occurred (3%): 1 bladder injury, and 1 fallopian tube injury requiring unilateral salpingectomy in the MIS group and 1 vascular injury in the open surgery group. The median lymph node count was 17 (range, 5-47) for MIS vs. 22 (range, 7-48) for open surgery (p = 0.03). There were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications (30% MIS vs. 31% open surgery). Among 83 patients who preserved their fertility (33 MIS vs. 50 open surgery), 34 (41%) patients attempted to get pregnant. Sixteen (47%) patients were able to do so (MIS: 2 vs. laparotomy: 14, p = 0.01). The pregnancy rate was higher in the open surgery group when compared to the MIS group (51% vs. 28%, p = 0.018). However, median follow-up was shorter is the MIS group compared with the open surgery group (25 months [range, 10-69] vs. 66 months [range, 11-147]). To date, there has been one recurrence in the laparotomy group and none in the MIS group. Conclusions. Our results suggest that radical trachelectomy via MIS results in less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. Fertility rates appear higher in patients undergoing open radical trachelectomy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally invasive versus open radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China
    Xiaopei Chao
    Lei Li
    Ming Wu
    Huanwen Wu
    Shuiqing Ma
    Xianjie Tan
    Sen Zhong
    Jinghe Lang
    Trials, 21
  • [22] Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan
    Tsuyoshi Ohta
    Satoru Nagase
    Yosuke Okui
    Takayuki Enomoto
    Wataru Yamagami
    Mikio Mikami
    Hideki Tokunaga
    Kazuhiko Ino
    Kimio Ushijima
    Makio Shozu
    Hironori Tashiro
    Masaki Mandai
    Shingo Miyamoto
    Ken-Ichirou Morishige
    Yoshio Yoshida
    Kiyoshi Yoshino
    Toshiaki Saito
    Eiji Kobayashi
    Hiroaki Kobayashi
    Munetaka Takekuma
    Yoshito Terai
    Takuma Fujii
    Hiroyuki Kanao
    Daisuke Aoki
    Hidetaka Katabuchi
    Nobuo Yaegashi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 26 : 2318 - 2330
  • [23] Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Tanaka, Tomohito
    Ueda, Shoko
    Miyamoto, Shunsuke
    Hashida, Sousuke
    Terada, Shinichi
    Konishi, Hiromi
    Kogata, Yuhei
    Taniguchi, Kohei
    Komura, Kazumasa
    Ohmichi, Masahide
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2272 - 2283
  • [24] Radical Trachelectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer A Systematic Review
    Smith, Evan S.
    Moon, Ashley S.
    O'Hanlon, Robin
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Mueller, Jennifer J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (03): : 533 - 542
  • [25] Pregnancies following radical trachelectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer
    Plante, M
    Roy, M
    7TH BIENNIAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL GYNECOLOGIC CANCER SOCIETY, 1999, : 449 - 453
  • [26] Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Roy, M
    Plante, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (06) : 1491 - 1496
  • [27] Fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer
    Shvygin, Anna
    Manning-Geist, Beryl L.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 129 (01) : 112 - 116
  • [28] MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER: CENTRAL AFRICA EXPERIENCE
    Tompeen, Isidore
    Tatsipie, Wilfried Loic
    Ndoua, Claude Cyrille Noa
    Ntsama, Junie Annick Metogo
    Poupon, Clothilde
    Uzan, Jennifer
    Miailhe, Gregoire
    Ngowa, Jean Dupont Kemfang
    Guyon, Frederic
    Foumane, Pascal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A109 - A110
  • [29] Minimally invasive surgery and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Yu, Yuanyi
    Deng, Ting
    Gu, Shequn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (02) : 255 - 264
  • [30] Radical Trachelectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
    Anthony Costales
    Chad Michener
    Pedro F. Escobar-Rodriguez
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2018, 19