Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery

被引:73
|
作者
Vieira, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Rendon, Gabriel J. [2 ]
Munsell, Mark [3 ]
Echeverri, Lina [2 ]
Frumovitz, Michael [4 ]
Schmeler, Kathleen M. [4 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
Escobar, Pedro F. [4 ]
dos Reis, Ricardo [1 ]
Ramirez, Pedro T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Inst Cancerol Las Amer, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
FERTILITY; OUTCOMES; CARCINOMA; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. Radical trachelectomy is considered standard of care in patients with early-stage cervical cancer interested in future fertility. The goal of this study was to compare operative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of patients from four institutions who underwent radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer from June 2002 to July 2013. Perioperative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes were compared between patients undergoing open vs. minimally invasive surgery. Results. A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-eight patients underwent open radical trachelectomy and 42 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS = laparoscopic or robotic). There were no differences in patient age, body mass index, race, histology, lymph vascular space invasion, or stage between the two groups. The median surgical time for MIS was 272 min [range, 130-441 min] compared with 270 min [range, 150-373 min] for open surgery (p = 0.78). Blood loss was significantly lower for MIS vs. laparotomy (50 mL [range, 10-225 mL] vs. 300 mL [50-1100 mL]) (p <0.0001). Nine patients required blood transfusion, all in the open surgery group (p = 0.010). Length of hospitalization was shorter for MIS than for laparotomy (1 day [1-3 days] vs. 4 days [1-9 days]) (p <0.0001). Three intraoperative complications occurred (3%): 1 bladder injury, and 1 fallopian tube injury requiring unilateral salpingectomy in the MIS group and 1 vascular injury in the open surgery group. The median lymph node count was 17 (range, 5-47) for MIS vs. 22 (range, 7-48) for open surgery (p = 0.03). There were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications (30% MIS vs. 31% open surgery). Among 83 patients who preserved their fertility (33 MIS vs. 50 open surgery), 34 (41%) patients attempted to get pregnant. Sixteen (47%) patients were able to do so (MIS: 2 vs. laparotomy: 14, p = 0.01). The pregnancy rate was higher in the open surgery group when compared to the MIS group (51% vs. 28%, p = 0.018). However, median follow-up was shorter is the MIS group compared with the open surgery group (25 months [range, 10-69] vs. 66 months [range, 11-147]). To date, there has been one recurrence in the laparotomy group and none in the MIS group. Conclusions. Our results suggest that radical trachelectomy via MIS results in less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. Fertility rates appear higher in patients undergoing open radical trachelectomy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Ling
    Chen, Yali
    Zheng, Ai
    Tan, Xin
    Chen, Hengxi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (09): : 4466 - 4477
  • [12] Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Is an Alternative to Laparotomy With Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    Ratnavelu, Nithya
    Patel, Amit
    Cameron, Iain
    Ralte, Angela
    Naik, Raj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (01) : 135 - 140
  • [13] Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer
    Chang, Shu-Han
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Yang, Lan-Yan
    Pan, Yu-Bin
    Lai, Chyong-Huey
    Chou, Hung-Hsueh
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 (05)
  • [14] Revisiting Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Pennington, Kathryn P.
    Urban, Renata R.
    Gray, Heidi J.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (01): : 86 - 90
  • [15] Systematic comparison of radical vaginal trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer
    Han, Ling
    Yang, Xiao-Yun
    Zheng, Ai
    Wang, Li
    Chu, Yan-Xia
    Wang, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 112 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [16] Minimally invasive versus open radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China
    Chao, Xiaopei
    Li, Lei
    Wu, Ming
    Wu, Huanwen
    Ma, Shuiqing
    Tan, Xianjie
    Zhong, Sen
    Lang, Jinghe
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [17] Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Casarin, Jvan
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Malzoni, Mario
    Greggi, Stefano
    Landoni, Fabio
    Bazzurini, Luca
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Multinu, Francesco
    Angioli, Roberto
    Plotti, Francesco
    Caruso, Giuseppe
    Fischetti, Margherita
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 275 : 64 - 69
  • [18] Modify or abandon: minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Uppal, Shitanshu
    Spencer, Ryan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (05) : 843 - 844
  • [19] Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan
    Ohta, Tsuyoshi
    Nagase, Satoru
    Okui, Yosuke
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Yamagami, Wataru
    Mikami, Mikio
    Tokunaga, Hideki
    Ino, Kazuhiko
    Ushijima, Kimio
    Shozu, Makio
    Tashiro, Hironori
    Mandai, Masaki
    Miyamoto, Shingo
    Morishige, Ken-Ichirou
    Yoshida, Yoshio
    Yoshino, Kiyoshi
    Saito, Toshiaki
    Kobayashi, Eiji
    Kobayashi, Hiroaki
    Takekuma, Munetaka
    Terai, Yoshito
    Fujii, Takuma
    Kanao, Hiroyuki
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Katabuchi, Hidetaka
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 (12) : 2318 - 2330
  • [20] Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Margul, Daniell J.
    Chen, Ling
    Keating, Nancy L.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Yang, Junhua
    Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
    Alexander, Amy
    Barber, Emma L.
    Rice, Laurel W.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Kocherginsky, Masha
    Shahabi, Shohreh
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20): : 1905 - 1914