Inter-comparison of Dose Distributions Calculated by FLUKA, GEANT4, MCNP, and PHITS for Proton Therapy

被引:17
|
作者
Yang, Zi-Yi [1 ]
Tsai, Pi-En [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Shao-Chun [1 ]
Liu, Yen-Chiang [1 ]
Chen, Chin-Cheng [3 ]
Sato, Tatsuhiko [2 ]
Sheu, Rong-Jiun [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Inst Nucl Engn & Sci, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[2] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] ProCure Proton Therapy Ctr, Somerset, NJ USA
关键词
BEAM THERAPY; PARTICLES; SETTINGS; MATTER; CODE;
D O I
10.1051/epjconf/201715304011
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The dose distributions from proton pencil beam scanning were calculated by FLUKA, GEANT4, MCNP, and PHITS, in order to investigate their applicability in proton radiotherapy. The first studied case was the integrated depth dose curves (IDDCs), respectively from a 100 and a 226-MeV proton pencil beam impinging a water phantom. The calculated IDDCs agree with each other as long as each code employs 75 eV for the ionization potential of water. The second case considered a similar condition of the first case but with proton energies in a Gaussian distribution. The comparison to the measurement indicates the inter-code differences might not only due to different stopping power but also the nuclear physics models. How the physics parameter setting affect the computation time was also discussed. In the third case, the applicability of each code for pencil beam scanning was confirmed by delivering a uniform volumetric dose distribution based on the treatment plan, and the results showed general agreement between each codes, the treatment plan, and the measurement, except that some deviations were found in the penumbra region. This study has demonstrated that the selected codes are all capable of performing dose calculations for therapeutic scanning proton beams with proper physics settings.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison study of the ridge filter parameter by using FLUKA and GEANT4 simulation codes
    Yongkeun Song
    Jaeik Shin
    Sungho Cho
    Seunghoon Yoo
    Ilsung Cho
    Eunho Kim
    Wongyun Jung
    Sanghyoun Choi
    Kyungmin Oh
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 67 : 96 - 102
  • [32] Dependence of the Depth-Dose Distributions and Ranges of Proton Beams in Water Medium on Geant4 Parameters
    Tok, A.
    Bektasoglu, M.
    Arslan, H.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2016, 130 (01) : 438 - 440
  • [33] Local dose enhancement of proton therapy by ceramic oxide nanoparticles investigated with Geant4 simulations
    McKinnon, Sally
    Guatelli, Susanna
    Incerti, Sebastien
    Ivanchenko, Vladimir
    Konstantinov, Konstantin
    Corde, Stephanie
    Lerch, Michael
    Tehei, Moeava
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (12): : 1584 - 1593
  • [34] Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams
    Baumann, Kilian-Simon
    Horst, Felix
    Zink, Klemens
    Goma, Carles
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (10) : 4639 - 4653
  • [35] Physics settings for using the Geant4 toolkit in proton therapy
    Jarlskog, Christina Zacharatou
    Paganetti, Harald
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2008, 55 (03) : 1018 - 1025
  • [36] Comparison of Geant4 and MCNP6 for use in delayed fission radiation simulation
    Hecht, A. A.
    Blakeley, R. E.
    Martin, W. J.
    Leonard, E.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 69 : 134 - 138
  • [37] Comparison of GATE/GEANT4 with EGSnrc and MCNP for electron dose calculations at energies between 15 keV and 20 MeV
    Maigne, L.
    Perrot, Y.
    Schaart, D. R.
    Donnarieix, D.
    Breton, V.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (03): : 811 - 827
  • [38] Comparison of the thermal neutron scattering treatment in MCNP6 and GEANT4 codes
    Tran, H. N.
    Marchix, A.
    Letourneau, A.
    Darpentigny, J.
    Menelle, A.
    Ott, F.
    Schwindling, J.
    Chauvin, N.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2018, 893 : 84 - 94
  • [39] Comparison of CdZnTe neutron detector models using MCNP6 and Geant4
    Wilson, Emma
    Anderson, Mike
    Prendergasty, David
    Cheneler, David
    ADVANCEMENTS IN NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (ANIMMA 2017), 2018, 170
  • [40] Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations based on Geant4 and Fluka to the TileCal test beam data
    Cascella, M.
    Gallas, M.
    Pokorski, W.
    Ribon, A.
    NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2009, 32 (3-4): : 425 - 428