Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions

被引:57
|
作者
Schroter, S [1 ]
Tite, L [1 ]
机构
[1] BMJ Publishing Grp, BMJ Editorial Off, London WC1H 9JR, England
关键词
D O I
10.1258/jrsm.99.3.141
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to assess journal authors' current knowledge and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. Design: An electronic survey. Setting: Authors of research papers submitted to BMJ, Archives of Disease in Childhood, and Journal of Medical Genetics in 2004. Main outcome measures: Familiarity with and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. Results: 468/1113 (42%) responded. Prior to definitions being provided, 47% (222/468) and 38% (176/468) reported they were familiar with the terms 'open access' and 'author-pays' publishing, respectively. Some who did not at first recognize the terms, did claim to recognize them when they were defined. Only 10% (49/468) had submitted to an author-pays journal. Compared with non-open access subscription-based journals, 35% agreed that open access author-pays journals have a greater capacity to publish more content making it easier to get published, 27% thought they had lower impact factors, 31% thought they had taster and more timely publicaitons, and 46% agreed that people will think anyone can pay to get published. 55% (256/468) thought they would not continue to submit to their respective journal if it became open access and charged, largely because of the reputaiton of the journals. Half (54%, 255/468) said open access has 'no impact' or was 'low priority' in their submission decisions. Two-thirds (66%, 308/468) said they would prefer to submit to a non-open access subscription-based journal than an open access author-pays journal. Over half thought they would have to make a contribution or pay the full cost of an author charge (56%, 262/468). Conclusions: The survey yielded useful information about respondents' knowledge and perceptions of these publishing models. Authors have limited familiarity with the concept of open-access publishing and surrounding issues. Currently, open access policies have little impact on authors' decision of where to submit papers.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of the Academic Journal Publisher and Open Access Publishing Models
    Morgan, Cliff
    Campbell, Bob
    Teleen, Terri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 13 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [42] Open Access Models and their Implications for the Players on the Scientific Publishing Market
    Bernius, Steffen
    Hanauske, Matthias
    Koenig, Wolfgang
    Dugall, Berndt
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2009, 39 (01) : 103 - 115
  • [43] Results of a PNAS author survey on an open access option for publication
    Cozzarelli, NR
    Fulton, KR
    Sullenberger, DM
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (05) : 1111 - 1111
  • [44] Open access: academic publishing and its implications for knowledge equity in Kenya
    Duncan Mwangangi Matheka
    Joseph Nderitu
    Daniel Mutonga
    Mary Iwaret Otiti
    Karen Siegel
    Alessandro Rhyll Demaio
    [J]. Globalization and Health, 10
  • [45] Open access: academic publishing and its implications for knowledge equity in Kenya
    Matheka, Duncan Mwangangi
    Nderitu, Joseph
    Mutonga, Daniel
    Otiti, Mary Iwaret
    Siegel, Karen
    Demaio, Alessandro Rhyll
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2014, 10
  • [46] Open access and predatory publishing: a survey of the publishing practices of academic pharmacists and nurses in the United States
    Conlogue, Bridget C.
    Gilman, Neyda, V
    Holmes, Louisa M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2022, 110 (03) : 294 - 305
  • [48] Acta Physiologica announces: publishing for nothing, open access for free for all German authors!
    Persson, P. B.
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2019, 226 (02) : 1 - 1
  • [49] Perceptions and Attitudes of Arab Information Technology Researchers Toward Open Access Publishing
    Seliaman, M. E.
    Salim, Eltahir
    Eldow, Moawia Elfaki Yahia
    [J]. 2012 IEEE COLLOQUIUM ON HUMANITIES, SCIENCE & ENGINEERING RESEARCH (CHUSER 2012), 2012,
  • [50] Problems of the publishing business and open access in the focus of 2018 Frankfurt Book Fair
    Zemskov, Andrey
    [J]. NAUCHNYE I TEKHNICHESKIE BIBLIOTEKI-SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL LIBRARIES, 2019, (05): : 94 - 103