Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions

被引:57
|
作者
Schroter, S [1 ]
Tite, L [1 ]
机构
[1] BMJ Publishing Grp, BMJ Editorial Off, London WC1H 9JR, England
关键词
D O I
10.1258/jrsm.99.3.141
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to assess journal authors' current knowledge and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. Design: An electronic survey. Setting: Authors of research papers submitted to BMJ, Archives of Disease in Childhood, and Journal of Medical Genetics in 2004. Main outcome measures: Familiarity with and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. Results: 468/1113 (42%) responded. Prior to definitions being provided, 47% (222/468) and 38% (176/468) reported they were familiar with the terms 'open access' and 'author-pays' publishing, respectively. Some who did not at first recognize the terms, did claim to recognize them when they were defined. Only 10% (49/468) had submitted to an author-pays journal. Compared with non-open access subscription-based journals, 35% agreed that open access author-pays journals have a greater capacity to publish more content making it easier to get published, 27% thought they had lower impact factors, 31% thought they had taster and more timely publicaitons, and 46% agreed that people will think anyone can pay to get published. 55% (256/468) thought they would not continue to submit to their respective journal if it became open access and charged, largely because of the reputaiton of the journals. Half (54%, 255/468) said open access has 'no impact' or was 'low priority' in their submission decisions. Two-thirds (66%, 308/468) said they would prefer to submit to a non-open access subscription-based journal than an open access author-pays journal. Over half thought they would have to make a contribution or pay the full cost of an author charge (56%, 262/468). Conclusions: The survey yielded useful information about respondents' knowledge and perceptions of these publishing models. Authors have limited familiarity with the concept of open-access publishing and surrounding issues. Currently, open access policies have little impact on authors' decision of where to submit papers.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Author preferences for open access in Portugal: survey findings
    Carvalho, Milena
    Boock, Michael
    Todorova, Tania Yordanova
    Martins, Susana
    Braga, Ines
    Pinto, Claudia
    [J]. LIBRARY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 44 (3/4) : 203 - 216
  • [32] Knowledge Production Ethos and Open Access Publishing: Africa in Focus
    Nwagwu, Williams Ezinwa
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 2018, 42 (3-4): : 249 - 277
  • [33] Power to the people-open access publishing and knowledge translation
    Adisesh, Anil
    Whiting, Anna
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2016, 66 (04): : 264 - 265
  • [34] Counterpoints about predatory open access and knowledge publishing in Africa
    Nwagwu, Williams Ezinwa
    [J]. LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2015, 28 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [35] The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany
    Eger, Thomas
    Scheufen, Marc
    Meierrieks, Daniel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 39 (03) : 475 - 503
  • [36] Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors
    Nicholas, D
    Huntington, P
    Rowlands, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2005, 61 (04) : 497 - 519
  • [37] The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany
    Thomas Eger
    Marc Scheufen
    Daniel Meierrieks
    [J]. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2015, 39 : 475 - 503
  • [38] Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities
    Gross, Julia
    Ryan, John Charles
    [J]. PUBLICATIONS, 2015, 3 (02): : 65 - 88
  • [39] Perceptions of open access publishing among academic journal editors in China
    Shao, Xiaorong
    Scherlen, Allan
    [J]. SERIALS REVIEW, 2007, 33 (02) : 114 - 121
  • [40] The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from countries in the Mediterranean Open Access Network (MedOANet)
    Eger T.
    Scheufen M.
    Meierrieks D.
    [J]. Economia e Politica Industriale, 2016, 43 (4) : 463 - 489