A Comparison among Classical and SDRE Techniques in Formation Flying Orbital Control

被引:0
|
作者
Felicetti, Leonard [1 ]
Palmerini, Giovanni B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, DIAEE, I-00138 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A key point in formation flying mission design is represented by the accuracy and the cost of maintaining the requested orbital configuration. In fact, the relative geometry among spacecraft should be kept within tight limits in order to accomplish payload missions. At the same time, this effort requires to accommodate onboard the relevant amount of propellant, which should be correctly evaluated. The quest for optimal control strategy faces the non linear nature of the orbital dynamics, furthermore affected by perturbations that can be only modeled and therefore not perfectly known. As a result, traditional optimal strategies as the Linear Quadratic Controller (LQR), which design can be achieved under the hypothesis of simplified (as an example linearized) dynamics, not always meet the objective. Innovative approaches, like the State Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) technique, allow to better take into account, at an increasing level of approximations, the real dynamics. The paper presents extensive results of the simulations carried out for two different problems in formation flying control: the maintaining of a desired relative geometry and the acquisition of a requested configuration. A relevant point, also with respect to currently available literature, is the fact that the considered reference orbits have an eccentricity different from zero.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of two methods in satellite formation flying
    Gao Yun-feng
    Baoyin He-xi
    Li Jun-feng
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2003, 24 (8) : 902 - 908
  • [42] Comparison of two methods in satellite formation flying
    Gao, YF
    Baoyin, HX
    Li, JF
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS-ENGLISH EDITION, 2003, 24 (08) : 902 - 908
  • [43] Hill's equations, mean orbital elements, and formation flying of satellites
    Vadali, SR
    Alfriend, KT
    Vaddi, S
    [J]. RICHARD H BATTIN ASTRODYNAMICS SYMPOSIUM, 2000, 106 : 187 - 203
  • [44] COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS IN SATELLITE FORMATION FLYING
    高云峰
    宝音贺西
    李俊峰
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2003, (08) : 902 - 908
  • [45] Comparison of Survey Techniques on Detection of Northern Flying Squirrels
    Diggins, Corinne A.
    Gilley, L. Michelle
    Kelly, Christine A.
    Ford, W. Mark
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2016, 40 (04): : 654 - 662
  • [46] Comparison of SDRE and SMC Control Approaches for Flutter Suppression in a Nonlinear Wing Section
    Elhami, M. R.
    Narab, M. Fatehi
    [J]. 2012 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2012, : 6148 - 6153
  • [47] Orbit and attitude control of spacecraft formation flying
    张治国
    李俊峰
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2008, (01) : 43 - 50
  • [48] The design of observers for formation-flying control
    Blazic, Saso
    Matko, Drago
    Rodic, Tomaz
    Dovzan, Dejan
    Music, Gasper
    Klancar, Gregor
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2013, 82 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [49] Linear and nonlinear control laws for formation flying
    Vaddi, SS
    Vadali, SR
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2003, PTS 1-3, 2003, 114 : 171 - 187
  • [50] Analysis of formation flying control of a pair of nanosatellites
    Veres, SM
    Gabriel, SB
    Mayne, DQ
    Rogers, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2002, 25 (05) : 971 - 974