Comparison of SDRE and SMC Control Approaches for Flutter Suppression in a Nonlinear Wing Section

被引:0
|
作者
Elhami, M. R.
Narab, M. Fatehi
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The effect of flutter phenomenon on dynamic stability of aeroelastic systems is a main interest of recent studies. Among many approaches for suppression of flutter, in this paper two control strategies are introduced and their results are compared. State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) approach and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) approach are used for stabilization of an Aeroservoelastic system with structural nonlinearities at subsonic flight speed regime. These two control techniques suppress flutter as well as reduce the vibration level in sub-critical and post-flutter speeds. The developed aeroservoelastic model describes the pitch and plunge motion of a wing section associated with a single control surface. For state-space representation of the model, the measured pitch angle, plunge displacement and their derivatives are allocated as state vector, and control surface deflection as input command. For a given initial state conditions, two modes of open loop and closed loop control system are simulated. It is shown that, with a nonlinear structure in subsonic regime, the open loop system is unstable and Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCOs) are generated. However, the closed loop system is asymptotically stable and converges to the origin. Therefore, the proposed approaches have a good performance on suppressing flutter and LCOs. However, comparing between the two approaches shows that SMC method requires larger control input, as well as a shorter time response with respect to SDRE method.
引用
收藏
页码:6148 / 6153
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonlinear combined SMC-SDRE control versus SMC and SDRE approaches for electrical flexible-joint robots based on optimal observer
    Nasiri, Neda
    Lademakhi, Naeim Yousefi
    [J]. 2021 9TH RSI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS (ICROM), 2021, : 568 - 573
  • [2] Incremental Nonlinear Control for Aeroelastic Wing Load Alleviation and Flutter Suppression
    Schildkamp, Roderick
    Chang, Jing
    Sodja, Jurij
    De Breuker, Roeland
    Wang, Xuerui
    [J]. ACTUATORS, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [3] Flutter Suppression for Underactuated Aeroelastic Wing Section: Nonlinear Gain-Scheduling Approach
    Lhachemi, H.
    Chu, Y.
    Saussie, D.
    Zhu, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2017, 40 (08) : 2102 - 2109
  • [4] Active Flutter Suppression of a Wing Section in a Compressible Flow
    Munoz, Alvaro
    Garcia-Fogeda, Pablo
    [J]. AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (12)
  • [5] Active flutter suppression for a two-dimensional airfoil based on an improved SDRE nonlinear robust control
    Gou Y.
    Li H.
    Dong X.
    Yang R.
    Zuo R.
    [J]. Dong, Xinmin, 1600, Chinese Vibration Engineering Society (36): : 149 - 153and158
  • [6] Flutter, postflutter, and control of a supersonic wing section
    Marzocca, P
    Librescu, L
    Silva, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2002, 25 (05) : 962 - 970
  • [7] Active Flutter Suppression of a Wing Section in the Subsonic, Sonic and Supersonic Regimes by the H∞ Control Method
    Munoz, Alvaro
    Garcia-Fogeda, Pablo
    [J]. AEROSPACE, 2024, 11 (03)
  • [8] Optimal Flutter Suppression of Nonlinear Typical Wing Section Using Time-Domain Finite Elements Method
    Fazelzadeh, S. A.
    Rasti, A.
    Sadat-Hoseini, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2014, 27 (05)
  • [9] Nonlinear flap for passive flutter control of bidimensional wing
    Fernandez-Escudero, Claudia
    Prothin, Sebastien
    Laurendeau, Eric
    Ross, Annie
    Michon, Guilhem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2023, 30 (23-24) : 5476 - 5485
  • [10] Investigation of the Flutter Suppression by Fuzzy Logic Control for Hypersonic Wing
    Li, Dongxu
    Luo, Qing
    Xu, Rui
    [J]. VIBRATION PROBLEMS ICOVP 2011, 2011, 139 : 753 - 758