Comparison of SDRE and SMC Control Approaches for Flutter Suppression in a Nonlinear Wing Section

被引:0
|
作者
Elhami, M. R.
Narab, M. Fatehi
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The effect of flutter phenomenon on dynamic stability of aeroelastic systems is a main interest of recent studies. Among many approaches for suppression of flutter, in this paper two control strategies are introduced and their results are compared. State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) approach and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) approach are used for stabilization of an Aeroservoelastic system with structural nonlinearities at subsonic flight speed regime. These two control techniques suppress flutter as well as reduce the vibration level in sub-critical and post-flutter speeds. The developed aeroservoelastic model describes the pitch and plunge motion of a wing section associated with a single control surface. For state-space representation of the model, the measured pitch angle, plunge displacement and their derivatives are allocated as state vector, and control surface deflection as input command. For a given initial state conditions, two modes of open loop and closed loop control system are simulated. It is shown that, with a nonlinear structure in subsonic regime, the open loop system is unstable and Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCOs) are generated. However, the closed loop system is asymptotically stable and converges to the origin. Therefore, the proposed approaches have a good performance on suppressing flutter and LCOs. However, comparing between the two approaches shows that SMC method requires larger control input, as well as a shorter time response with respect to SDRE method.
引用
收藏
页码:6148 / 6153
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adaptive control for a nonlinear wing section with multiple flaps
    Behal, A.
    Rao, V. M.
    Marzocca, P.
    Kamaludeen, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2006, 29 (03) : 744 - 749
  • [22] Flutter suppression of a high aspect-ratio wing with multiple control surfaces
    Zhao, Y. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2009, 324 (3-5) : 490 - 513
  • [23] Nonlinear control of a prototypical wing section with torsional nonlinearity
    Texas A&M Univ, College Station, United States
    [J]. J Guid Control Dyn, 6 (1181-1189):
  • [24] Time-domain modeling and control of a wing-section stall flutter
    Sun, Zhiwei
    Haghighat, Sohrab
    Liu, Hugh H. T.
    Bai, Junqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2015, 340 : 221 - 238
  • [25] Nonlinear control of a prototypical wing section with torsional nonlinearity
    Ko, J
    Kurdila, AJ
    Strganac, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1997, 20 (06) : 1181 - 1189
  • [26] Flutter Optimization of a Wing-Engine System with Passive and Active Control Approaches
    Asadi, Davood
    Farsadi, Touraj
    Kayran, Altan
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (04) : 1422 - 1440
  • [27] Wing flutter suppression enhancement using a well-suited active control model
    Marretta, R. M. A.
    Marino, F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2007, 221 (G3) : 441 - 452
  • [28] Nonlinear control design of an airfoil with active flutter suppression in the presence of disturbance
    Afkhami, S.
    Alighanbari, H.
    [J]. IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 1 (06): : 1638 - 1649
  • [29] Active flow control of a wing section in stall flutter by dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators
    Hajipour, M.
    Ebrahimi, A.
    Amandolese, X.
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2022, 34 (07)
  • [30] Delayed sub-optimal control for active flutter suppression of a three-dimensional wing
    Zhou, Qing
    Yu, Zhangwei
    Cai, Guoping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 80 : 275 - 287