Applications of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors (SBAF) for Cross-Calibration

被引:145
|
作者
Chander, Gyanesh [1 ]
Mishra, Nischal [2 ]
Helder, Dennis L. [2 ]
Aaron, David B. [2 ]
Angal, Amit [3 ]
Choi, Taeyoung [4 ,5 ]
Xiong, Xiaoxiong [6 ]
Doelling, David R. [7 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Stinger Ghaffarian Technol, Earth Resources Observat & Sci EROS Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Sigma Space Corp, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
来源
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY); Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Hyperion; Landsat 7 (L7) Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); radiometric cross-calibration; relative spectral response (RSR); spectral band adjustment factors (SBAFs); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); LANDSAT-7 ETM+; SCIAMACHY; PERFORMANCE; SAHARAN; SENSORS; SITES; TM;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228007
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
To monitor land surface processes over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales, it is critical to have coordinated observations of the Earth's surface acquired from multiple space-borne imaging sensors. However, an integrated global observation framework requires an understanding of how land surface processes are seen differently by various sensors. This is particularly true for sensors acquiring data in spectral bands whose relative spectral responses (RSRs) are not similar and thus may produce different results while observing the same target. The intrinsic offsets between two sensors caused by RSR mismatches can be compensated by using a spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF), which takes into account the spectral profile of the target and the RSR of the two sensors. The motivation of this work comes from the need to compensate the spectral response differences of multispectral sensors in order to provide a more accurate cross-calibration between the sensors. In this paper, radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and the Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors was performed using near-simultaneous observations over the Libya 4 pseudoinvariant calibration site in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. The RSR differences of the analogous ETM+ and MODIS spectral bands provide the opportunity to explore, understand, quantify, and compensate for the measurement differences between these two sensors. The cross-calibration was initially performed by comparing the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectances between the two sensors over their lifetimes. The average percent differences in the long-term trends ranged from -5% to + 6%. The RSR compensated ETM+ TOA reflectance (ETM+*) measurements were then found to agree with MODIS TOA reflectance to within 5% for all bands when Earth Observing-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data were used to produce the SBAFs. These differences were later reduced to within 1% for all bands (except band 2) by using Environmental Satellite Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography hyperspectral data to produce the SBAFs.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1281
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USE OF EO-1 HYPERION DATA TO CALCULATE SPECTRAL BAND ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (SBAF) BETWEEN THE L7 ETM+ AND TERRA MODIS SENSORS
    Chander, G.
    Mishra, N.
    Helder, D. L.
    Aaron, D.
    Choi, T.
    Angal, A.
    Xiong, X.
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2010, : 1667 - 1670
  • [42] Cross-calibration of two small footprint sensors
    GustafsonBold, CL
    Thome, KJ
    IGARSS '96 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM: REMOTE SENSING FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, VOLS I - IV, 1996, : 1283 - 1285
  • [43] Universal cross-calibration of bone mineral density
    Hui, SL
    Lu, Y
    Genant, HK
    Glueer, CC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1996, 11 : S602 - S602
  • [44] Uncertainty analysis in cross-calibration and optimization calculation of calibration coefficients
    Gao Shuai
    Li Yuan
    Bai Ting-zhu
    Zhang Yu-xiang
    Zheng Xiao-bing
    CHINESE OPTICS, 2020, 13 (03): : 568 - 576
  • [45] Aspects of the Cross-Calibration Method in Laser Goniometry
    P. A. Pavlov
    Measurement Techniques, 2015, 58 : 970 - 974
  • [46] OCO/GOSAT Preflight Cross-Calibration Experiment
    Sakuma, Fumihiro
    Bruegge, Carol J.
    Rider, David
    Brown, David
    Geier, Sven
    Kawakami, Shuji
    Kuze, Akihiko
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 48 (01): : 585 - 599
  • [47] Cross-Calibration of Hinode/EIS and SDO/AIA
    O'Dwyer, B.
    Del Zanna, G.
    Mason, H. E.
    Weber, M. A.
    Tripathi, D.
    4TH HINODE SCIENCE MEETING: UNSOLVED PROBLEMS AND RECENT INSIGHTS, 2012, 455 : 369 - +
  • [48] Aspects of the Cross-Calibration Method in Laser Goniometry
    Pavlov, P. A.
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2015, 58 (09) : 970 - 974
  • [49] CROSS-CALIBRATION BETWEEN AIRBORNE SAR SENSORS
    ZINK, M
    OLIVIER, P
    FREEMAN, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1993, 31 (01): : 237 - 245
  • [50] Radiometric cross-calibration of Terra ASTER and MODIS
    Yuan, Karen
    Thome, Kurt
    McCorkel, Joel
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XX, 2015, 9607