Applications of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors (SBAF) for Cross-Calibration

被引:145
|
作者
Chander, Gyanesh [1 ]
Mishra, Nischal [2 ]
Helder, Dennis L. [2 ]
Aaron, David B. [2 ]
Angal, Amit [3 ]
Choi, Taeyoung [4 ,5 ]
Xiong, Xiaoxiong [6 ]
Doelling, David R. [7 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Stinger Ghaffarian Technol, Earth Resources Observat & Sci EROS Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Sigma Space Corp, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
来源
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY); Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Hyperion; Landsat 7 (L7) Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); radiometric cross-calibration; relative spectral response (RSR); spectral band adjustment factors (SBAFs); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); LANDSAT-7 ETM+; SCIAMACHY; PERFORMANCE; SAHARAN; SENSORS; SITES; TM;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228007
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
To monitor land surface processes over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales, it is critical to have coordinated observations of the Earth's surface acquired from multiple space-borne imaging sensors. However, an integrated global observation framework requires an understanding of how land surface processes are seen differently by various sensors. This is particularly true for sensors acquiring data in spectral bands whose relative spectral responses (RSRs) are not similar and thus may produce different results while observing the same target. The intrinsic offsets between two sensors caused by RSR mismatches can be compensated by using a spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF), which takes into account the spectral profile of the target and the RSR of the two sensors. The motivation of this work comes from the need to compensate the spectral response differences of multispectral sensors in order to provide a more accurate cross-calibration between the sensors. In this paper, radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and the Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors was performed using near-simultaneous observations over the Libya 4 pseudoinvariant calibration site in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. The RSR differences of the analogous ETM+ and MODIS spectral bands provide the opportunity to explore, understand, quantify, and compensate for the measurement differences between these two sensors. The cross-calibration was initially performed by comparing the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectances between the two sensors over their lifetimes. The average percent differences in the long-term trends ranged from -5% to + 6%. The RSR compensated ETM+ TOA reflectance (ETM+*) measurements were then found to agree with MODIS TOA reflectance to within 5% for all bands when Earth Observing-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data were used to produce the SBAFs. These differences were later reduced to within 1% for all bands (except band 2) by using Environmental Satellite Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography hyperspectral data to produce the SBAFs.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1281
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SCATTEROMETER CROSS-CALIBRATION USING ANTARCTICA AS A CALIBRATION TARGET
    Porter, Nathan
    Long, David G.
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 4282 - 4285
  • [32] TRUTHS CROSS-CALIBRATION UNCERTAINTY TOOL
    Gorrono, Javier
    Fox, Nigel
    Bialek, Agnieszka
    Green, Paul
    Scanlon, Tracy
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2015, : 2135 - 2138
  • [33] Preflight cross-calibration activities at NRLM
    Sakuma, F.
    Advances in Space Research, 23 (08): : 1435 - 1442
  • [34] Cross-calibration of ground and space radar
    Gojara, K
    Chandrasekar, V
    IGARSS 2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM AND 24TH CANADIAN SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING, VOLS I-VI, PROCEEDINGS: REMOTE SENSING: INTEGRATING OUR VIEW OF THE PLANET, 2002, : 2823 - 2825
  • [35] Preflight cross-calibration activities at NRLM
    Sakuma, F
    CALIBRATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SATELLITE SENSORS, 1999, 23 (08): : 1435 - 1442
  • [36] Cross-calibration of interferometric SAR data
    Dall, J
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2003, 150 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [37] Online Cross-Calibration of Camera and LIDAR
    Blaga, Bianca-Cerasela-Zelia
    Nedevschi, Sergiu
    2017 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND PROCESSING (ICCP), 2017, : 295 - 301
  • [38] Cross-calibration of cluster mass observables
    Cunha, Carlos
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2009, 79 (06):
  • [39] Spectral Reflectance Estimation of UAS Multispectral Imagery Using Satellite Cross-Calibration Method
    Gowravaram, Saket
    Chao, Haiyang
    Molthan, Andrew
    Zhao, Tiebiao
    Tian, Pengzhi
    Flanagan, Harold
    Schultz, Lori
    Bell, Jordan
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 87 (10): : 735 - 746
  • [40] AIRS Level-1C and applications to cross-calibration with MODIS and CrIS
    Manning, Evan M.
    Aumann, Hartmut H.
    Behrangi, Ali
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XIX, 2014, 9218