Applications of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors (SBAF) for Cross-Calibration

被引:145
|
作者
Chander, Gyanesh [1 ]
Mishra, Nischal [2 ]
Helder, Dennis L. [2 ]
Aaron, David B. [2 ]
Angal, Amit [3 ]
Choi, Taeyoung [4 ,5 ]
Xiong, Xiaoxiong [6 ]
Doelling, David R. [7 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Stinger Ghaffarian Technol, Earth Resources Observat & Sci EROS Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Sigma Space Corp, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
来源
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY); Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Hyperion; Landsat 7 (L7) Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); radiometric cross-calibration; relative spectral response (RSR); spectral band adjustment factors (SBAFs); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); LANDSAT-7 ETM+; SCIAMACHY; PERFORMANCE; SAHARAN; SENSORS; SITES; TM;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228007
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
To monitor land surface processes over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales, it is critical to have coordinated observations of the Earth's surface acquired from multiple space-borne imaging sensors. However, an integrated global observation framework requires an understanding of how land surface processes are seen differently by various sensors. This is particularly true for sensors acquiring data in spectral bands whose relative spectral responses (RSRs) are not similar and thus may produce different results while observing the same target. The intrinsic offsets between two sensors caused by RSR mismatches can be compensated by using a spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF), which takes into account the spectral profile of the target and the RSR of the two sensors. The motivation of this work comes from the need to compensate the spectral response differences of multispectral sensors in order to provide a more accurate cross-calibration between the sensors. In this paper, radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and the Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors was performed using near-simultaneous observations over the Libya 4 pseudoinvariant calibration site in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. The RSR differences of the analogous ETM+ and MODIS spectral bands provide the opportunity to explore, understand, quantify, and compensate for the measurement differences between these two sensors. The cross-calibration was initially performed by comparing the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectances between the two sensors over their lifetimes. The average percent differences in the long-term trends ranged from -5% to + 6%. The RSR compensated ETM+ TOA reflectance (ETM+*) measurements were then found to agree with MODIS TOA reflectance to within 5% for all bands when Earth Observing-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data were used to produce the SBAFs. These differences were later reduced to within 1% for all bands (except band 2) by using Environmental Satellite Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography hyperspectral data to produce the SBAFs.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1281
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the uncertainty in the spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF) for cross-calibration using Monte Carlo simulation
    Pinto, Cibele T.
    Ponzoni, Flavio J.
    Castro, Ruy M.
    Leigh, Larry
    Kaewmanee, Morakot
    Aaron, David
    Helder, Dennis
    REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2016, 7 (09) : 837 - 846
  • [2] Evaluation of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors for Cross-Calibration of Visible Imagers
    Doelling, David R.
    Haney, Conor O.
    Bhatt, Rajendra
    Scarino, Benjamin R.
    Gopalan, Arun
    Khakurel, Prathana
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XXVII, 2022, 12232
  • [3] Sensitivity Analysis of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors For GF-1/WFV Sensor Cross-Calibration
    Zhou Ke
    Liu Li
    Yu Tao
    Gu Xing-fa
    Zheng Feng-bin
    Zang Wen-qian
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (12) : 3809 - 3813
  • [4] SPECTRAL BAND ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR CROSS CALIBRATION OF GF-1 WFV AND TERRA MODIS
    Liu, Li
    Shi, Tingting
    Fu, Qiaoyan
    Han, Qijin
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2015, : 2119 - 2122
  • [5] Global cross-calibration of Landsat spectral mixture models
    Sousa, Daniel
    Small, Christopher
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 192 : 139 - 149
  • [6] SBAF for Cross-Calibration of Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI over North African PICS
    Pinto, Cibele Teixeira
    Shrestha, Mahesh
    Hasan, Nahid
    Leigh, Larry
    Helder, Dennis
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XXIII, 2018, 10764
  • [7] CROSS-CALIBRATION TECHNIQUES
    HOLLAND, JZ
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1971, 52 (11) : 1159 - &
  • [8] Investigation on functional form in cross-calibration of spectral vegetation index
    Yoshioka, Hiroki
    Miura, Tomoaki
    Yamamoto, Hirokazu
    REMOTE SENSING AND MODELING OF ECOSYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY III, 2006, 6298
  • [9] Impacts of spectral band difference effects on radiometric cross-calibration between satellite sensors in the solar-reflective spectral domain
    Teillet, P. M.
    Fedosejevs, G.
    Thome, K. J.
    Barker, John L.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 110 (03) : 393 - 409
  • [10] HJ-1A THERMAL INFRARED BAND CROSS-CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION
    Li, Jiaguo
    Gu, Xingfa
    Zhu, Li
    Yu, Tao
    Li, Xiaoying
    Zhang, Yuxiang
    Gao, Hailiang
    Gong, Hui
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 2167 - +