EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme

被引:30
|
作者
Kennedy, Robin H. [1 ]
Francis, Anne [2 ]
Dutton, Susan [3 ]
Love, Sharon [3 ]
Pearson, Sarah [2 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [4 ,5 ]
Quirke, Philip [6 ]
Franks, Peter J. [7 ]
Kerr, David J. [8 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Harrow, Middx, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Oncol Clin Trials Off, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Dept Oncol, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Acad Unit Surg Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Mol Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Ctr Res & Implementat Clin Practice, London, England
[8] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Lab Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Laparoscopy; Colon cancer; Rectal cancer; Enhanced recovery programme; Fast track surgery; Health economics; Cosmetic assessment; Fatigue; Randomised controlled trial; EnROL; COLON-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; ASSISTED COLECTOMY; RECTAL-CANCER; BODY-IMAGE; RESECTION; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; PATHWAY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-12-181
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: During the last two decades the use of laparoscopic resection and a multimodal approach known as an enhanced recovery programme, have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care. Clinical outcome improves using laparoscopic surgery to resect colorectal cancer but until recently no multicentre trial evidence had been reported regarding whether the benefits of laparoscopy still exist when open surgery is optimized within an enhanced recovery programme. The EnROL trial (Enhanced Recovery Open versus Laparoscopic) examines the hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme will provide superior postoperative outcomes when compared to conventional open resection of colorectal cancer within the same programme. Methods/design: EnROL is a phase III, multicentre, randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open resection of colon and rectal cancer with blinding of patients and outcome observers to the treatment allocation for the first 7 days post-operatively, or until discharge if earlier. 202 patients will be recruited at approximately 12 UK hospitals and randomised using minimization at a central computer system in a 1:1 ratio. Recruiting surgeons will previously have performed > 100 laparoscopic colorectal resections and > 50 open total mesorectal excisions to minimize conversion. Eligible patients are those suitable for elective resection using either technique. Excluded patients include: those with acute intestinal obstruction and patients in whom conversion from laparoscopic to open procedure is likely. The primary outcome is physical fatigue as measured by the physical fatigue domain of the multidimensional fatigue inventory 20 (MFI-20) with secondary outcomes including postoperative hospital stay; complications; reoperation and readmission; quality of life indicators; cosmetic assessments; standardized performance indicators; health economic analysis; the other four domains of the MFI-20. Pathological assessment of surgical quality will also be undertaken and compliance with the enhanced recovery programme will be recorded for all patients. Discussion: Should this trial demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery confers a significant clinical and/or health economic benefit this will further support the transition to this type of surgery, with implications for the training of surgeons and resource allocation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic colorectal resections within an enhanced recovery programme; discharge at 24 hours is feasible and safe
    Gash, K.
    Goede, A.
    Dixon, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 19 - 19
  • [42] Improved outcomes with laparoscopic surgery within an Enhanced Recovery Programme for colorectal cancers - experience at an outlier District General Hospital.
    Joel, A.
    Subramonia, S.
    Krishna, A.
    Davies, K.
    McCormick, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 120 - 120
  • [43] Correction to: An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study
    O. Diaz-Cambronero
    G. Mazzinari
    C. L. Errando
    M. J. Schultz
    B. Flor Lorente
    N. García-Gregorio
    M. Vila Montañés
    Daniel Robles-Hernández
    L. E. Olmedilla Arnal
    A. Martín-De-Pablos
    A. Marqués Marí
    M. P. Argente Navarro
    Trials, 21
  • [44] Electroacupuncture versus sham electroacupuncture in the treatment of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial
    Zou, Xuan
    Yang, Ying-Chi
    Wang, Yu
    Pei, Wei
    Han, Jia-Gang
    Lu, Yun
    Zhang, Mao-Shen
    Tu, Jian Feng
    Lin, Lu Lu
    Wang, Li-Qiong
    Shi, Guangxia
    Yan, Shi-Yan
    Yang, Jing-Wen
    Liu, Cun-Zhi
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for immune function in patients with colorectal cancer
    Chuanyuan Liu
    Jungang Liu
    Sen Zhang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2011, 26
  • [46] Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for immune function in patients with colorectal cancer
    Liu, Chuanyuan
    Liu, Jungang
    Zhang, Sen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (11) : 1375 - 1385
  • [47] Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic approach in colorectal cancer surgery
    Elizabeth, Baker
    Deborah, Wilson
    Talvinder, Gill
    Dharmendra, Garg
    David, Borowski
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [48] Enhanced recovery after surgery programme for patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer
    Bailey, S.
    Da Fonseca, J.
    Elliott, J.
    Kok, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 : 23 - 23
  • [50] The impact of complications on a programme of enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery
    Giovanni D. Tebala
    Antonio Gallucci
    Abdul Q. Khan
    BMC Surgery, 18