EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme

被引:30
|
作者
Kennedy, Robin H. [1 ]
Francis, Anne [2 ]
Dutton, Susan [3 ]
Love, Sharon [3 ]
Pearson, Sarah [2 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [4 ,5 ]
Quirke, Philip [6 ]
Franks, Peter J. [7 ]
Kerr, David J. [8 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Harrow, Middx, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Oncol Clin Trials Off, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Dept Oncol, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Acad Unit Surg Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Mol Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Ctr Res & Implementat Clin Practice, London, England
[8] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Lab Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Laparoscopy; Colon cancer; Rectal cancer; Enhanced recovery programme; Fast track surgery; Health economics; Cosmetic assessment; Fatigue; Randomised controlled trial; EnROL; COLON-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; ASSISTED COLECTOMY; RECTAL-CANCER; BODY-IMAGE; RESECTION; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; PATHWAY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-12-181
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: During the last two decades the use of laparoscopic resection and a multimodal approach known as an enhanced recovery programme, have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care. Clinical outcome improves using laparoscopic surgery to resect colorectal cancer but until recently no multicentre trial evidence had been reported regarding whether the benefits of laparoscopy still exist when open surgery is optimized within an enhanced recovery programme. The EnROL trial (Enhanced Recovery Open versus Laparoscopic) examines the hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme will provide superior postoperative outcomes when compared to conventional open resection of colorectal cancer within the same programme. Methods/design: EnROL is a phase III, multicentre, randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open resection of colon and rectal cancer with blinding of patients and outcome observers to the treatment allocation for the first 7 days post-operatively, or until discharge if earlier. 202 patients will be recruited at approximately 12 UK hospitals and randomised using minimization at a central computer system in a 1:1 ratio. Recruiting surgeons will previously have performed > 100 laparoscopic colorectal resections and > 50 open total mesorectal excisions to minimize conversion. Eligible patients are those suitable for elective resection using either technique. Excluded patients include: those with acute intestinal obstruction and patients in whom conversion from laparoscopic to open procedure is likely. The primary outcome is physical fatigue as measured by the physical fatigue domain of the multidimensional fatigue inventory 20 (MFI-20) with secondary outcomes including postoperative hospital stay; complications; reoperation and readmission; quality of life indicators; cosmetic assessments; standardized performance indicators; health economic analysis; the other four domains of the MFI-20. Pathological assessment of surgical quality will also be undertaken and compliance with the enhanced recovery programme will be recorded for all patients. Discussion: Should this trial demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery confers a significant clinical and/or health economic benefit this will further support the transition to this type of surgery, with implications for the training of surgeons and resource allocation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study
    O. Diaz-Cambronero
    G. Mazzinari
    C. L. Errando
    M. J. Schultz
    B. Flor Lorente
    N. García-Gregorio
    M. Vila Montañés
    Daniel Robles-Hernández
    L. E. Olmedilla Arnal
    A. Martín-De-Pablos
    A. Marqués Marí
    M. P. Argente Navarro
    Trials, 20
  • [32] A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery:: A preliminary report
    Milsom, JW
    Böhm, B
    Hammerhofer, KA
    Fazio, V
    Steiger, E
    Elson, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 187 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [33] Complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Results of a multicentre trial
    Rose J.
    Schneider C.
    Yildirim C.
    Geers P.
    Scheidbach H.
    Köckerling F.
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2004, 8 (Suppl 1) : S25 - S28
  • [34] Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme
    Vlug, M. S.
    Wind, J.
    van der Zaag, E.
    Ubbink, D. T.
    Cense, H. A.
    Bemelman, W. A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (04) : 335 - 343
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Liu, Zhi-min
    Yao, Qi-jun
    Pei, Fengyun
    He, Fang
    Zhao, Yandong
    Huang, Jun
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [36] Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study)
    Wong-Lun-Hing, E. M.
    van Dam, R. M.
    van Breukelen, G. J. P.
    Tanis, P. J.
    Ratti, F.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Slooter, G. D.
    de Wilt, J. H. W.
    Liem, M. S. L.
    de Boer, M. T.
    Klaase, J. M.
    Neumann, U. P.
    Aldrighetti, L. A.
    Dejong, C. H. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (05) : 525 - 535
  • [37] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Peri-operative Care in Colorectal Cancer
    Ogata, Yutaka
    Ishibashi, Nobuya
    Uchida, Shinji
    Murakami, Naotaka
    Yamaguchi, Keizou
    Tanaka, Katsuaki
    Shirouzu, Kazuo
    XXV BIENNAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY COLON & RECTAL SURGEONS - ISUCRS: X NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY SURGEONS - SICU, 2012, : 153 - 157
  • [38] Dissemination metastasis after laparoscopic colorectal surgery versus conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer: a metanalysis
    Zanghi, A.
    Cavallaro, A.
    Piccolo, G.
    Fisichella, R.
    Di Vita, M.
    Sparta, D.
    Zanghi, G.
    Berretta, S.
    Palermo, F.
    Cappellani, A.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (09) : 1174 - 1184
  • [39] Enhanced postoperative recovery and laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Tilney, H. S.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (03) : 282 - 283
  • [40] Outcomes of prophylactic ureteric stenting for elective colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme
    Currie, A.
    Limb, C.
    Decker, E.
    Mundy, J.
    Baig, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 120 - 120