EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme

被引:30
|
作者
Kennedy, Robin H. [1 ]
Francis, Anne [2 ]
Dutton, Susan [3 ]
Love, Sharon [3 ]
Pearson, Sarah [2 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [4 ,5 ]
Quirke, Philip [6 ]
Franks, Peter J. [7 ]
Kerr, David J. [8 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Harrow, Middx, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Oncol Clin Trials Off, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Dept Oncol, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Acad Unit Surg Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Mol Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Ctr Res & Implementat Clin Practice, London, England
[8] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Lab Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Laparoscopy; Colon cancer; Rectal cancer; Enhanced recovery programme; Fast track surgery; Health economics; Cosmetic assessment; Fatigue; Randomised controlled trial; EnROL; COLON-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; ASSISTED COLECTOMY; RECTAL-CANCER; BODY-IMAGE; RESECTION; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; PATHWAY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-12-181
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: During the last two decades the use of laparoscopic resection and a multimodal approach known as an enhanced recovery programme, have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care. Clinical outcome improves using laparoscopic surgery to resect colorectal cancer but until recently no multicentre trial evidence had been reported regarding whether the benefits of laparoscopy still exist when open surgery is optimized within an enhanced recovery programme. The EnROL trial (Enhanced Recovery Open versus Laparoscopic) examines the hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme will provide superior postoperative outcomes when compared to conventional open resection of colorectal cancer within the same programme. Methods/design: EnROL is a phase III, multicentre, randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open resection of colon and rectal cancer with blinding of patients and outcome observers to the treatment allocation for the first 7 days post-operatively, or until discharge if earlier. 202 patients will be recruited at approximately 12 UK hospitals and randomised using minimization at a central computer system in a 1:1 ratio. Recruiting surgeons will previously have performed > 100 laparoscopic colorectal resections and > 50 open total mesorectal excisions to minimize conversion. Eligible patients are those suitable for elective resection using either technique. Excluded patients include: those with acute intestinal obstruction and patients in whom conversion from laparoscopic to open procedure is likely. The primary outcome is physical fatigue as measured by the physical fatigue domain of the multidimensional fatigue inventory 20 (MFI-20) with secondary outcomes including postoperative hospital stay; complications; reoperation and readmission; quality of life indicators; cosmetic assessments; standardized performance indicators; health economic analysis; the other four domains of the MFI-20. Pathological assessment of surgical quality will also be undertaken and compliance with the enhanced recovery programme will be recorded for all patients. Discussion: Should this trial demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery confers a significant clinical and/or health economic benefit this will further support the transition to this type of surgery, with implications for the training of surgeons and resource allocation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
    Robin H Kennedy
    Anne Francis
    Susan Dutton
    Sharon Love
    Sarah Pearson
    Jane M Blazeby
    Philip Quirke
    Peter J Franks
    David J Kerr
    BMC Cancer, 12
  • [2] Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Within an Enhanced Recovery Programme: EnROL
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    Francis, E. Anne
    Wharton, Rose
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Quirke, Philip
    West, Nicholas P.
    Dutton, Susan J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (17) : 1804 - U84
  • [3] Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
    King, PM
    Blazeby, JM
    Ewings, P
    Franks, PJ
    Longman, RJ
    Kendrick, AH
    Kipling, RM
    Kennedy, RH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (03) : 300 - 308
  • [4] Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
    P. M. King
    J. M. Blazeby
    P. Ewings
    R. H. Kennedy
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2008, 23 : 795 - 800
  • [5] Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
    King, P. M.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Ewings, P.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 23 (08) : 795 - 800
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Christoph Kuemmerli
    Robert S. Fichtinger
    Alma Moekotte
    Luca A. Aldrighetti
    Somaiah Aroori
    Marc G. H. Besselink
    Mathieu D’Hondt
    Rafael Díaz-Nieto
    Bjørn Edwin
    Mikhail Efanov
    Giuseppe M. Ettorre
    Krishna V. Menon
    Aali J. Sheen
    Zahir Soonawalla
    Robert Sutcliffe
    Roberto I. Troisi
    Steven A. White
    Lloyd Brandts
    Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
    Jasper Sijberden
    Siân A. Pugh
    Zina Eminton
    John N. Primrose
    Ronald van Dam
    Mohammed Abu Hilal
    Trials, 23
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Kuemmerli, Christoph
    Fichtinger, Robert S.
    Moekotte, Alma
    Aldrighetti, Luca A.
    Aroori, Somaiah
    Besselink, Marc G. H.
    D'Hondt, Mathieu
    Diaz-Nieto, Rafael
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Efanov, Mikhail
    Ettorre, Giuseppe M.
    Menon, Krishna, V
    Sheen, Aali J.
    Soonawalla, Zahir
    Sutcliffe, Robert
    Troisi, Roberto, I
    White, Steven A.
    Brandts, Lloyd
    van Breukelen, Gerard J. P.
    Sijberden, Jasper
    Pugh, Sian A.
    Eminton, Zina
    Primrose, John N.
    van Dam, Ronald
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [8] Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Guillou, PJ
    Quirke, P
    Thorpe, H
    Walker, J
    Jayne, DG
    Smith, AMH
    Heath, RM
    Brown, JM
    LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472): : 1718 - 1726
  • [9] Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?
    Munk-Madsen, P.
    Eriksen, J. R.
    Kehlet, H.
    Gogenur, I
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (12) : 1438 - 1444
  • [10] Optimal analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme
    Jones, C.
    Smith, R. L.
    Fawcett, W. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2012, 73 (03) : 178 - 178