Test-retest-reliability and validity of the kinesiology muscle test

被引:27
|
作者
Lüdtke, R
Kunz, B
Seeber, N
Ring, J
机构
[1] Karl & Veronica Carstens Stiftung, D-45276 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hautklin, D-2000 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Klin & Poliklin Dermatol & Allergol Biederstein, Munich, Germany
关键词
applied kinesiology; muscle testing; insect venom allergy; diagnostic tests;
D O I
10.1054/ctim.2001.0455
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the test-retest-reliability and validity of the Health Kinesiology muscle test. Patients: Seven patients with clinically and allergologically confirmed wasp venom allergy. Design: Four Health Kinesiology-examiners. tested each patient in a random order for 10 verum and 10 placebo bottles. All examiners used the anterior deltoid as indicator muscle. Patients and examiners were completely blinded. Outcome Measures: Weak muscle holds were rated as 'sensitivity' towards the test substance, stable holding as normal (not sensitive). Results: An overall kappa of 0.03 (95%-CI: -0.02-0.07) indicates the test is not reliable. Individual kappas do not substantially vary from examiner to examiner. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated at 40% and 60%. Conclusions: The results suggest that the use of Health Kinesiology as a diagnostic tool is not more useful than random guessing. This should at least be true in patients with insect venom allergy that are tested by examiners with average skills. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 145
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Test-retest Reliability And Validity Of The Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire
    Reis, Jared P.
    DuBose, Katrina D.
    Ainsworth, Barbara E.
    Macera, Caroline A.
    Yore, Michelle M.
    Jones, Deborah A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S110 - S111
  • [32] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Standardized Video Interview
    Jayakumar, Kishore L.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (11) : 1599 - 1599
  • [33] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the information processing styles
    Baloglu, M
    Zelhart, PF
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2000, 87 (03) : 973 - 979
  • [34] Kuder Career Search: Test-retest reliability and consequential validity
    Ihle-Helledy, K
    Zytowski, DG
    Fouad, NA
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [35] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Experiential Discounting Task
    Smits, Rochelle R.
    Stein, Jeffrey S.
    Johnson, Patrick S.
    Odum, Amy L.
    Madden, Gregory J.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 21 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [36] Test-retest reliability and validity studies of the skills confidence inventory
    Parsons, E
    Betz, NE
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 1998, 6 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [37] Validity and test-retest reliability of a disability questionnaire for essential tremor
    Louis, ED
    Barnes, LF
    Wendt, KJ
    Albert, SM
    Pullman, SL
    Yu, QP
    Schneier, FR
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2000, 15 (03) : 516 - 523
  • [38] Test-retest reliability and validity of body composition methods in adults
    Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O.
    Lee, Jennifer J.
    Boateng, Terence
    Plastina, Stephanie E.
    Cleary, Shane
    Huang, Liuye
    Kucab, Michaela
    Paterakis, Stella
    Brett, Neil R.
    Bellissimo, Nick
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 41 (05) : 417 - 425
  • [39] Test-retest reliability and validity of a frustration paradigm and irritability measures
    Tseng, Wan-Ling
    Moroney, Elizabeth
    Machlin, Laura
    Roberson-Nay, Roxann
    Hettema, John M.
    Carney, Dever
    Stoddard, Joel
    Towbin, Kenneth A.
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Leibenluft, Ellen
    Brotman, Melissa A.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 212 : 38 - 45
  • [40] Test retest reliability of %CDT
    Javors, M. A.
    Koek, W.
    Johnson, B. J.
    Marques, P. R.
    Anthenelli, R. M.
    Tian, P. Y.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (06) : 66A - 66A