Benchmarking and Feasibility Aspects of Machine Learning in Space Systems

被引:4
|
作者
Raoofy, Amir [1 ]
Dax, Gabriel [2 ]
Serra, Vittorio [3 ]
Ghiglione, Max [3 ]
Werner, Martin [2 ]
Trinitis, Carsten [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Supercomp Ctr, Garching, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
[3] Airbus Def & Sapce GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
Onboard Computers; Machine Learning; Benchmarking; FPGA-enabled COTS;
D O I
10.1145/3528416.3530986
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Compute in space, e.g., in miniaturized satellites, requires dealing with special physical and boundary constraints, including the limited energy budget. These constraints impose strict operational conditions on the on-board data processing system and its capability in dealing with sophisticated workloads suchlike Machine Learning (ML). In the meantime, the breakthroughs in ML based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in the last decade promise innovative solutions to expand the functional capabilities of on-board data processing and to drive the space industry forward. Therefore, due to the aforementioned special requirements, performance- and power-efficient, and novel solutions and architectures for deploying ML via, e.g., FPGA-enabled SoC, particularly Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) solutions, are gaining significant interest in the space industry. Therefore it is essential to conduct extensive benchmarking and feasibility and efficiency analyses in different aspects: such analyses would require the investigation of options for programming and deployment as well as the investigation of various real-world models and datasets. To this end, a research and development activity is funded by the European Space Agency (ESA) General Support Technology Programme and is led by Airbus Defence and Space GmbH with the goal of developing an ML Application Benchmark (MLAB) that covers benchmarking aspects mentioned above. In this invited paper, we provide an overview of the MLAB project and discuss development and progress in various directions, including framework analyses, model, and dataset investigation. We elaborate on a benchmarking methodology developed in the context of this project to enable the analysis of various hardware platforms and options. In the end, focus on a particular use case of aircraft detection as a real-world example and provide an analysis of various performance and accuracy indicators including, accuracy, throughput, latency, and power consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 226
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Benchmarking machine learning models for quantum state classification
    Pedicillo, Edoardo
    Pasquale, Andrea
    Carrazza, Stefano
    26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING IN HIGH ENERGY AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS, CHEP 2023, 2024, 295
  • [22] Benchmarking econometric and machine learning methodologies in nowcasting GDP
    Daniel Hopp
    Empirical Economics, 2024, 66 : 2191 - 2247
  • [23] Benchmarking Machine Learning Models to Assist in the Prognosis of Tuberculosis
    Lino Ferreira da Silva Barros, Maicon Herverton
    Oliveira Alves, Geovanne
    Morais Florencio Souza, Lubnnia
    da Silva Rocha, Elisson
    Lorenzato de Oliveira, Joao Fausto
    Lynn, Theo
    Sampaio, Vanderson
    Endo, Patricia Takako
    INFORMATICS-BASEL, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [24] Benchmarking econometric and machine learning methodologies in nowcasting GDP
    Hopp, Daniel
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 66 (05) : 2191 - 2247
  • [25] ClimateLearn: Benchmarking Machine Learning for Weather and Climate Modeling
    Tung Nguyen
    Jewik, Jason
    Bansal, Hritik
    Sharma, Prakhar
    Grover, Aditya
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [26] Benchmarking quantum tomography completeness and fidelity with machine learning
    Teo, Yong Siah
    Shin, Seongwook
    Jeong, Hyunseok
    Kim, Yosep
    Kim, Yoon-Ho
    Struchalin, Gleb, I
    Kovlakov, Egor, V
    Straupe, Stanislav S.
    Kulik, Sergei P.
    Leuchs, Gerd
    Sanchez-Soto, Luis L.
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (10):
  • [27] Summit: Benchmarking Machine Learning Methods for Reaction Optimisation
    Felton, Kobi C.
    Rittig, Jan G.
    Lapkin, Alexei A.
    CHEMISTRYMETHODS, 2021, 1 (02): : 116 - 122
  • [28] Fair and Comprehensive Benchmarking of Machine Learning Processing Chips
    Burr, Geoffrey W.
    Lim, SukHwan
    Murmann, Boris
    Venkatesan, Rangharajan
    Verhelst, Marian
    IEEE DESIGN & TEST, 2022, 39 (03) : 18 - 27
  • [29] Benchmarking Safety Monitors for Image Classifiers with Machine Learning
    Ferreira, Raul Sena
    Arlat, Jean
    Guiochet, Jeremie
    Waeselynck, Helene
    2021 IEEE 26TH PACIFIC RIM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEPENDABLE COMPUTING (PRDC 2021), 2021, : 7 - 16
  • [30] Benchmarking machine learning models to predict corporate bankruptcy
    Alanis, Emmanuel
    Chava, Sudheer
    Shah, Agam
    JOURNAL OF CREDIT RISK, 2023, 19 (02): : 77 - 110