Life cycle sustainability assessment of crops in India

被引:16
|
作者
Selvaraj, Ambika [1 ]
Gautam, Jagrati [2 ]
Verma, Shikhar [2 ]
Verma, Gaurav [2 ]
Jain, Siddhant [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Hyderabad, India
[2] Dayalbagh Educ Inst, Dayalbagh, Agra, India
来源
CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Sustainability assessment; Life cycle impact analysis; Agriculture sector in India; Crop cultivation; Agricultural sustainability; PESTICIDE USE; IMPACTS; CULTIVATION; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100074
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In India, the modernization in the agricultural sector is continuously growing to meet the food demand of rising population. However, along with addressing hunger, modern agriculture impacts the ecosystem, human health, and resources, due to huge consumption of agrochemicals, and emission-intensive farming hence urges sus-tainable assessment. Till now, no impact assessment is reported on world???s second-largest agricultural country -India. This paper is the first of its kind in evaluating the impact of the cultivation of 21 commonly grown crops that possess high production and emissions in India. The results were discussed in the order of impact parameters in respective years with possible causes and remedial measures. The results showed that rice has topped in maximum indices followed by sugarcane, wheat, and banana. The study forecasted that coconut played a concentrated role in global warming, while potato and sugarcane have a higher impact on water and ozone depletion, respectively. The outcomes of this study suggested appropriate improvements in farming practices, which can bring the emissions down and make the system more sustainable. Besides, these 18 indices were individually assessed for their connection with the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the aspects of agricultural activities to select the appropriate indices to measure the agricultural sustainability along with the identification of gaps to upgrade the existing indices or formulate a new one. Subsequently, this helps in achieving the SDGs in India with the least impact on the environment without compromising the socio-economic aspects involved in crop production and agricultural systems.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE APPROACH OF LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BIOREFINERIES
    Jungmeier, G.
    Hingsamer, M.
    Steiner, D.
    Kaltenegger, I.
    Kleinegris, D.
    Van Ree, R.
    de Jong, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1660 - 1665
  • [22] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S.
    Nuclear Energy, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [23] The revised mathematics of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Heijungs, Reinout
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [24] Mapping sustainability assessment with the project life cycle
    Thomson, Craig S.
    El-Haram, Mohamed A.
    Emmanuel, Rohinton
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 164 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [25] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [26] Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?
    Stefania Pizzirani
    Sarah J. McLaren
    Jeffrey K. Seadon
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1316 - 1330
  • [27] Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?
    Pizzirani, Stefania
    McLaren, Sarah J.
    Seadon, Jeffrey K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (06): : 1316 - 1330
  • [28] Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle
    He, Bin
    Luo, Ting
    Huang, Shan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 : 238 - 250
  • [29] The Use of Life Cycle Techniques in the Assessment of Sustainability
    Gundes, Selin
    URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (UPADSD), 2016, 216 : 916 - 922
  • [30] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sonia Valdivia
    Jana Gerta Backes
    Marzia Traverso
    Guido Sonnemann
    Stefano Cucurachi
    Jeroen B. Guinée
    Thomas Schaubroeck
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Noemie Leroy-Parmentier
    Cássia Ugaya
    Claudia Peña
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Atsushi Inaba
    Milena Amaral
    Markus Berger
    Jolanta Dvarioniene
    Tatiana Vakhitova
    Catherine Benoit-Norris
    Martina Prox
    Rajendra Foolmaun
    Mark Goedkoop
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1900 - 1905