Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign diseases of the kidney: Prospective nonrandomized comparison with open surgical nephrectomy

被引:14
|
作者
Hemal, AK [1 ]
Talwar, M [1 ]
Wadhwa, SN [1 ]
Gupta, NP [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.1999.13.425
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe, define, and evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (RPN) for benign diseases of the kidney and to compare it with open surgical nephrectomy (OSN) via a flank approach. Patients and Methods: From August 1995 to November 1997, 29 men and 14 women (mean age 33 years) with severely damaged kidneys underwent RPN. Among these, 11 patients had undergone prior surgery, 3 had chronic renal failure, and 8 patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy. The RPN was performed via three or four ports, with the kidneys being removed intact from the retroperitoneal working space. During the same period, 43 patients underwent OSN through a flank approach (extrapleural and extraperitoneal) for nonfunctioning or poorly functioning kidneys. Results: In the RPN group, two patients required conversion to OSN. The operative time and estimated blood loss ranged from 40 to 210 minutes (mean 114 minutes) and 50 to 450 mL (mean 127 mL), respectively. In the OSN group, the corresponding values were 60 to 100 minutes (mean 104 minutes) and 70 to 600 mL (mean 266 mL), respectively. The mean length of hospitalization after RPN was considerably shorter-2 to 7 days (mean 3.4 days)-than after conventional open surgery-4 to 16 days (mean 8.6 days). The incidences of minor and major complications were 21% and 5%, respectively, in the RPN group and 33% and 2% in the OSN group. The postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly less (P < 0.001) in RPN group. The interval to return to normal activity ranged from 7 to 30 days (mean 20.3 days) and 20 to 60 days (mean 32.9 days) in the RPN and OSN group, respectively, with superior performance status, cosmesis, and quality of life observed in the former group. Conclusion: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is as effective as open nephrectomy for benign kidney diseases with less postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay, earlier recuperation, and excellent cosmesis. This procedure can also be performed in patients who have undergone abdominal operations previously, in those with chronic renal failure, and in those with a percutaneous nephrostomy. The operation has become our first line of approach for benign diseases of the kidney.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 431
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy versus open approaches to nonfunctioning tuberculous kidneys: A report of 44 cases
    Zhang, X
    Zheng, T
    Ma, X
    Li, HZ
    Li, LC
    Wang, SG
    Wu, ZQ
    Pan, TJ
    Ye, ZQ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (05): : 1586 - 1589
  • [42] A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open donor nephrectomy
    Khauli, RB
    Hussein, M
    Shaar, A
    Madi, R
    Medawar, W
    Habbal, A
    Kazma, A
    Dagher, F
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (07) : 2552 - 2552
  • [43] A comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: a multicentric survey
    Esposito, Ciro
    Escolino, Maria
    Miyano, Go
    Caione, Paolo
    Chiarenza, Fabio
    Riccipetitoni, Giovanna
    Yamataka, Atsuyuki
    Savanelli, Antonio
    Settimi, Alessandro
    Varlet, Francois
    Patkowski, Dariusz
    Cerulo, Mariapina
    Castagnetti, Marco
    Till, Holger
    Marotta, Rosaria
    La Manna, Angela
    Valla, Jean-Stephane
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (07) : 939 - 948
  • [44] A comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: a multicentric survey
    Ciro Esposito
    Maria Escolino
    Go Miyano
    Paolo Caione
    Fabio Chiarenza
    Giovanna Riccipetitoni
    Atsuyuki Yamataka
    Antonio Savanelli
    Alessandro Settimi
    Francois Varlet
    Dariusz Patkowski
    Mariapina Cerulo
    Marco Castagnetti
    Holger Till
    Rosaria Marotta
    Angela La Manna
    Jean-Stephane Valla
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 939 - 948
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy-10 years results of a nonrandomized comparison in 549 patients
    Zacharias, M
    Melchior, A
    Doehn, C
    Jocham, D
    Fornara, P
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 339 - 339
  • [46] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of retroperitoneoscopic versus transperitoneoscopic approach
    Ng, Zi Qin
    Musk, Gabrielle
    He, Bulang
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (07) : S142 - S142
  • [47] Open versus prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: A comparative study
    Cascio, Salvatore
    Winning, Jake
    Flett, Martyn E.
    Fyfe, Alasdair H.
    O'Toole, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2011, 7 (01) : 61 - 64
  • [48] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Open Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with a Solitary Kidney
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Bhayani, Sam
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Stifelman, Michael
    Rogers, Craig
    Larson, Jeffrey
    Ball, Mark W.
    Marshall, Susan
    Kumar, Ramesh
    Fergany, Amr
    Campbell, Steven
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (10) : 1224 - 1230
  • [49] A comparison of renal function following hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy in patients with a normal contralateral kidney
    L'esperance, JO
    Springhart, WP
    Sur, RL
    Norris, RD
    Scales, CD
    Robertson, CR
    Preminger, GM
    Albala, DM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 141 - 141
  • [50] Retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: A case report
    Chen, Di-Xiang
    Wang, Zi-Hao
    Wang, Shan-Jie
    Zhu, Yue-Yue
    Li, Nan
    Wang, Xian-Qiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (10) : 1169 - 1176