Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign diseases of the kidney: Prospective nonrandomized comparison with open surgical nephrectomy

被引:14
|
作者
Hemal, AK [1 ]
Talwar, M [1 ]
Wadhwa, SN [1 ]
Gupta, NP [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.1999.13.425
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe, define, and evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (RPN) for benign diseases of the kidney and to compare it with open surgical nephrectomy (OSN) via a flank approach. Patients and Methods: From August 1995 to November 1997, 29 men and 14 women (mean age 33 years) with severely damaged kidneys underwent RPN. Among these, 11 patients had undergone prior surgery, 3 had chronic renal failure, and 8 patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy. The RPN was performed via three or four ports, with the kidneys being removed intact from the retroperitoneal working space. During the same period, 43 patients underwent OSN through a flank approach (extrapleural and extraperitoneal) for nonfunctioning or poorly functioning kidneys. Results: In the RPN group, two patients required conversion to OSN. The operative time and estimated blood loss ranged from 40 to 210 minutes (mean 114 minutes) and 50 to 450 mL (mean 127 mL), respectively. In the OSN group, the corresponding values were 60 to 100 minutes (mean 104 minutes) and 70 to 600 mL (mean 266 mL), respectively. The mean length of hospitalization after RPN was considerably shorter-2 to 7 days (mean 3.4 days)-than after conventional open surgery-4 to 16 days (mean 8.6 days). The incidences of minor and major complications were 21% and 5%, respectively, in the RPN group and 33% and 2% in the OSN group. The postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly less (P < 0.001) in RPN group. The interval to return to normal activity ranged from 7 to 30 days (mean 20.3 days) and 20 to 60 days (mean 32.9 days) in the RPN and OSN group, respectively, with superior performance status, cosmesis, and quality of life observed in the former group. Conclusion: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is as effective as open nephrectomy for benign kidney diseases with less postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay, earlier recuperation, and excellent cosmesis. This procedure can also be performed in patients who have undergone abdominal operations previously, in those with chronic renal failure, and in those with a percutaneous nephrostomy. The operation has become our first line of approach for benign diseases of the kidney.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 431
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy of a horseshoe kidney with renal-cell carcinoma
    Kitamura, H
    Tanaka, T
    Miyamoto, D
    Inomata, H
    Hatakeyama, J
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (10) : 907 - 908
  • [33] Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney
    Gemalmaz, Hakan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2008, 7 (04): : 43 - 47
  • [34] COMPARISON OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF OPEN, LAPAROSCOPIC, AND ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Boylu, U.
    Pinsky, M.
    Tracey, A.
    Hopkins, M.
    Thomas, R.
    Lee, B.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A126 - A126
  • [35] Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney
    Lane, Brian R.
    Novick, Andrew C.
    Babineau, Denise
    Fergany, Amr F.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03): : 847 - 851
  • [36] Comparison between Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Traditional Open Nephrectomy to Treat Polycystic Kidney Disease before Kidney Transplantation
    Lyu, Jing-Cheng
    Du, Chun-Kai
    Zhu, Yi-Chen
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (02) : 74 - 79
  • [37] Comparison of Acute and Chronic Pain after Open Nephrectomy versus Laparoscopic Nephrectomy A Prospective Clinical Trial
    Alper, Isik
    Yuksel, Esra
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (16)
  • [38] RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY USING A GELPORT AS THE MAIN ACCESS PLATFORM: STANDARDIZATION OF SURGICAL APPROACH BEYOND THE PURPOSE OF NEPHRECTOMY
    Kasahara, Takashi
    Nishiyama, Tsutomu
    Saito, Kazuhide
    Arai, Kei
    Takahashi, Kota
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A208 - A209
  • [39] Early graft function in kidney transplantation: Comparison between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy
    Percegona, L. S.
    Bignelli, A. T.
    Adarny, A., Jr.
    Machado, C.
    Pilz, F.
    Meyer, F.
    Hokazono, S. R.
    Riella, M. C.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (03) : 685 - 686
  • [40] Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy:: A comparison with the open approach in respect of early postoperative pain management
    Bachmann, A
    Giannini, O
    Wolff, T
    Dickenmann, M
    Ruszat, R
    Langer, I
    Gürke, L
    Gasser, TC
    Reich, O
    Stief, CG
    Steiger, J
    Sulser, T
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 609 - 612