SPATIOTEMPORAL ASSESSMENT AND VALUATION OF PROVISIONING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF PAKISTAN

被引:5
|
作者
Shedayi, A. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, M. [1 ,4 ]
Gonalez-Redin, J. [5 ]
Hagist, S. C. N. [6 ]
Aslam, S. [7 ]
Khan, N. [8 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modelling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Karakoram Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Gilgit 15100, Pakistan
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Grant F Walton Ctr Remote Sensing & Spatial Anal, Sch Environm & Biol Sci, Dept Ecol Evolut & Nat Resources, 14 Coll Farm Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[5] James Hutton Inst Craigibuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
[6] Stanford Univ, Freeman Spogli Inst Int Studies, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, MOE Key Lab Biodivers Sci & Ecol Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Malakand, Dept Bot, Lower Dir 18800, Khyber Pakhtunk, Pakistan
来源
关键词
conservation; food security; human well-being; poverty reduction; valuation; ECONOMIC VALUATION; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.15666/aeer/1703_67356759
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Developing countries are often beset by poverty and hunger. While provisioning ecosystem services (Prov.ES) are essential for eradication of these issues, they are being rapidly depleted due to climate change and anthropogenic impacts. However, their depletion has not been accounted for in sustainable use policy. Taking Pakistan as a case study, this research focuses on assessing and evaluating the dynamics of Prov.ES. It evaluates the contribution of Prov.ES to poverty reduction using key indicators over different spatiotemporal scales. Among provisioning services, livestock's contribution was the highest, followed by agricultural products, while fisheries and forests contributed the least. Prov.ES were shown to be important to Pakistan's economy. Product analysis revealed that livestock was the most contributing service (53%), followed by agriculture (44%), while fisheries and forests contributed to a smaller extent (<= 2%). Livestock products, major crops, marine fish products, and medicinal plants are the main contributors in those respective fields. Our results showed a net present value of 569 US$/ha/year, which is very close to the median value of the 16 previous studies analyzed. Incorporating natural resource conservation into sustainable development policies, with a focus on the impacts of climate change and the increasing human population, is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:6735 / 6759
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The energetic basis for valuation of ecosystem services
    Odum, HT
    Odum, EP
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2000, 3 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [32] Misconceptions about the valuation of ecosystem services
    Costanza, Robert
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 70
  • [33] Value and valuation of forest ecosystem services
    Zhang, Daowei
    Stenger, Anne
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2015, 4 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [34] A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services
    Felipe-Lucia, Maria R.
    Comin, Francisco A.
    Escalera-Reyes, Javier
    AMBIO, 2015, 44 (04) : 308 - 318
  • [35] Valuation of ecosystem services in institutional context
    Pritchard, L
    Folke, C
    Gunderson, L
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2000, 3 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [36] A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services
    María R. Felipe-Lucia
    Francisco A. Comín
    Javier Escalera-Reyes
    AMBIO, 2015, 44 : 308 - 318
  • [37] Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services
    Costanza, R
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2000, 3 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [38] Social Goals and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services
    Robert Costanza
    Ecosystems, 2000, 3 : 4 - 10
  • [39] Economic valuation of ecosystem services in Africa
    Jamouli, Aya
    Allali, Khali
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE NEXUS PERSPECTIVES: WATER, FOOD AND BIODIVERSITY (I2CNP 2020), 2020, 183
  • [40] Linking ecological footprints with ecosystem valuation in the provisioning of urban freshwater
    Jenerette, G. Darrel
    Marussich, Wendy A.
    Newell, Joshua P.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (01) : 38 - 47