SPATIOTEMPORAL ASSESSMENT AND VALUATION OF PROVISIONING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF PAKISTAN

被引:5
|
作者
Shedayi, A. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, M. [1 ,4 ]
Gonalez-Redin, J. [5 ]
Hagist, S. C. N. [6 ]
Aslam, S. [7 ]
Khan, N. [8 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modelling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Karakoram Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Gilgit 15100, Pakistan
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Grant F Walton Ctr Remote Sensing & Spatial Anal, Sch Environm & Biol Sci, Dept Ecol Evolut & Nat Resources, 14 Coll Farm Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[5] James Hutton Inst Craigibuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
[6] Stanford Univ, Freeman Spogli Inst Int Studies, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, MOE Key Lab Biodivers Sci & Ecol Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Malakand, Dept Bot, Lower Dir 18800, Khyber Pakhtunk, Pakistan
来源
关键词
conservation; food security; human well-being; poverty reduction; valuation; ECONOMIC VALUATION; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.15666/aeer/1703_67356759
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Developing countries are often beset by poverty and hunger. While provisioning ecosystem services (Prov.ES) are essential for eradication of these issues, they are being rapidly depleted due to climate change and anthropogenic impacts. However, their depletion has not been accounted for in sustainable use policy. Taking Pakistan as a case study, this research focuses on assessing and evaluating the dynamics of Prov.ES. It evaluates the contribution of Prov.ES to poverty reduction using key indicators over different spatiotemporal scales. Among provisioning services, livestock's contribution was the highest, followed by agricultural products, while fisheries and forests contributed the least. Prov.ES were shown to be important to Pakistan's economy. Product analysis revealed that livestock was the most contributing service (53%), followed by agriculture (44%), while fisheries and forests contributed to a smaller extent (<= 2%). Livestock products, major crops, marine fish products, and medicinal plants are the main contributors in those respective fields. Our results showed a net present value of 569 US$/ha/year, which is very close to the median value of the 16 previous studies analyzed. Incorporating natural resource conservation into sustainable development policies, with a focus on the impacts of climate change and the increasing human population, is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:6735 / 6759
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic Analysis for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis and Scenario Valuation of Changes in Ecosystem Services
    Ian J. Bateman
    Amii R. Harwood
    David J. Abson
    Barnaby Andrews
    Andrew Crowe
    Steve Dugdale
    Carlo Fezzi
    Jo Foden
    David Hadley
    Roy Haines-Young
    Mark Hulme
    Andreas Kontoleon
    Paul Munday
    Unai Pascual
    James Paterson
    Grischa Perino
    Antara Sen
    Gavin Siriwardena
    Mette Termansen
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 57 : 273 - 297
  • [22] Economic Analysis for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis and Scenario Valuation of Changes in Ecosystem Services
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Harwood, Amii R.
    Abson, David J.
    Andrews, Barnaby
    Crowe, Andrew
    Dugdale, Steve
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Foden, Jo
    Hadley, David
    Haines-Young, Roy
    Hulme, Mark
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    Munday, Paul
    Pascual, Unai
    Paterson, James
    Perino, Grischa
    Sen, Antara
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    Termansen, Mette
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 57 (02): : 273 - 297
  • [23] The Energetic Basis for Valuation of Ecosystem Services
    Howard T. Odum
    Eugene P. Odum
    Ecosystems, 2000, 3 : 21 - 23
  • [24] An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services
    Chee, YE
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 120 (04) : 549 - 565
  • [25] Mangroves in the Galapagos: Ecosystem services and their valuation
    Tanner, Michael K.
    Moity, Nicolas
    Costa, Matthew T.
    Marin Jarrin, Jose R.
    Aburto-Oropeza, Octavio
    Salinas-de-Leon, Pelayo
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 160 : 12 - 24
  • [26] Ecosystem services valuation by pioneering companies
    Gattas, Pedro F.
    De Campos, Jose Guilherme F.
    Barakat, Simone R.
    Orsato, Renato J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 13 (3-4) : 479 - 497
  • [27] Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Taiwan
    Lin, Jiunn-Cheng
    Chiou, Chyi-Rong
    Chan, Wei-Hsun
    Wu, Meng-Shan
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (12):
  • [28] Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Institutional Context
    Lowell Pritchard Jr.
    Carl Folke
    Lance Gunderson
    Ecosystems, 2000, 3 : 36 - 40
  • [29] Classification and valuation of soil ecosystem services
    Jonsson, Jon Orvar G.
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 145 : 24 - 38
  • [30] Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Ruiz-Perez, Manuel
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 35 (05): : 613 - 628