Harmonisation of Animal Testing Alternatives in China

被引:4
|
作者
Cheng, Shujun [1 ]
Qu, Xiaoting [2 ]
Qin, Yao [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Inspect & Quarantine Technol Ctr, B Tower,66 Huacheng Ave, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou CHN ALT Biotech Co Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS | 2017年 / 45卷 / 06期
关键词
alternatives; cosmetics; in vitro; non-animal testing; safety assessment;
D O I
10.1177/026119291704500603
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
More and more countries are lining up to follow the EU's approach and implement a full ban on the sale of cosmetics that have been tested on animals, which has been the case in the EU since 2013. Besides animal welfare considerations, the need for mutual acceptance of data (MAD) and harmonisation of the global market have made the move toward non-animal testing a desirable general trend for countries worldwide. Over the last 10 years, the concept of alternative methods has been gradually developing in China. This has seen the harmonisation of relevant legislation, the organisation of various theoretical and hands-on training sessions, the exploration of method validation, the adoption of internationally recognised methods, the propagation of alternative testing standards, and an in-depth investigation into the potential use of in vitro methods in the biosciences. There are barriers to this progress, including the demand for a completely new infrastructure, the need to build technology capability, the requirement for a national standardisation system formed through international co-operation, and the lack of technical assistance to facilitate self-innovation. China is now increasing speed in harmonising its approach to the use of non-animal alternatives, accelerating technological development and attempting to incorporate non-animal, in vitro, testing methods into the national regulatory system.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 338
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives
    Manfred Liebsch
    Barbara Grune
    Andrea Seiler
    Daniel Butzke
    Michael Oelgeschläger
    Ralph Pirow
    Sarah Adler
    Christian Riebeling
    Andreas Luch
    Archives of Toxicology, 2011, 85 : 841 - 858
  • [42] THE JOHNS-HOPKINS-CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING
    GOLDBERG, AM
    FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (04): : 517 - 518
  • [43] ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING IN USP - PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
    DABBAH, R
    PHARMACOPEIAL FORUM, 1992, 18 (06): : 4416 - 4418
  • [44] Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives
    Liebsch, Manfred
    Grune, Barbara
    Seiler, Andrea
    Butzke, Daniel
    Oelgeschlaeger, Michael
    Pirow, Ralph
    Adler, Sarah
    Riebeling, Christian
    Luch, Andreas
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 85 (08) : 841 - 858
  • [45] Alternatives to animal testing: Research, trends, validation, regulatory acceptance
    Huggins, J
    ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN, 2003, 20 : 3 - 61
  • [46] CHARTING A COURSE FOR CELL-CULTURE ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING
    GOLBERG, L
    FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1986, 6 (04): : 607 - 617
  • [47] Alternatives for Animal Testing: A More Humane Approach To Clinical Research
    Kumar, Santosh
    Dagli, Namrata
    Haque, Mainul
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 22 (03): : 472 - 474
  • [48] ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING IN THE USP-NF - PRESENT AND FUTURE
    UNDERHILL, LA
    DABBAH, R
    GRADY, LT
    RHODES, CT
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 1994, 20 (02) : 165 - 216
  • [49] JaCVAMis role on new alternatives to animal testing and international harmonization
    Kojima, H.
    Inoe, T.
    Ohno, Y.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 196 : S96 - S96
  • [50] Assessment of skin sensitization in pesticides using alternatives to animal testing
    Park, H. J.
    Lee, M. J.
    Park, Y. K.
    Park, S. J.
    Lim, J. H.
    Shin, J. Y.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 350 : S98 - S98