Harmonisation of Animal Testing Alternatives in China

被引:4
|
作者
Cheng, Shujun [1 ]
Qu, Xiaoting [2 ]
Qin, Yao [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Inspect & Quarantine Technol Ctr, B Tower,66 Huacheng Ave, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou CHN ALT Biotech Co Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
alternatives; cosmetics; in vitro; non-animal testing; safety assessment;
D O I
10.1177/026119291704500603
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
More and more countries are lining up to follow the EU's approach and implement a full ban on the sale of cosmetics that have been tested on animals, which has been the case in the EU since 2013. Besides animal welfare considerations, the need for mutual acceptance of data (MAD) and harmonisation of the global market have made the move toward non-animal testing a desirable general trend for countries worldwide. Over the last 10 years, the concept of alternative methods has been gradually developing in China. This has seen the harmonisation of relevant legislation, the organisation of various theoretical and hands-on training sessions, the exploration of method validation, the adoption of internationally recognised methods, the propagation of alternative testing standards, and an in-depth investigation into the potential use of in vitro methods in the biosciences. There are barriers to this progress, including the demand for a completely new infrastructure, the need to build technology capability, the requirement for a national standardisation system formed through international co-operation, and the lack of technical assistance to facilitate self-innovation. China is now increasing speed in harmonising its approach to the use of non-animal alternatives, accelerating technological development and attempting to incorporate non-animal, in vitro, testing methods into the national regulatory system.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 338
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The validation and acceptance of alternatives to animal testing
    Balls, M
    Fentem, JH
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1999, 13 (4-5) : 837 - 846
  • [22] Industrial use of alternatives to animal testing
    Saito, Koichi
    Suzuki, Noriyuki
    Kobayashi, Kumiko
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 133 (03) : S74 - S74
  • [23] THE SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING INTENSIFIES
    LEWIS, R
    SCIENTIST, 1991, 5 (15): : 23 - 24
  • [24] Animal testing alternatives come alive in US
    Elie Dolgin
    Nature Medicine, 2010, 16 : 1348 - 1348
  • [25] In silico Methods - Computational Alternatives to Animal Testing
    Lang, Annemarie
    Volkamer, Andrea
    Behm, Laura
    Roeblitz, Susanna
    Ehrig, Rainald
    Schneider, Marlon
    Geris, Liesbet
    Wichard, Joerg
    Buttgereit, Frank
    ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2018, 35 (01) : 126 - 128
  • [26] Trend on alternatives to animal testing in the cosmetic industry
    Hagino, Shigenobu
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 124 : 24P - 24P
  • [27] Alternatives to animal testing for evaluating local irritations
    Okamoto, Y
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 94 : 72P - 72P
  • [28] Alternatives to animal testing in the safety evaluation of products
    Knight, DJ
    Breheny, D
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2002, 30 (01): : 7 - 22
  • [29] 10 YEARS AND STILL NO ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING
    JACKSON, EM
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 12 (04): : 261 - 263
  • [30] Altbib: Alternatives to animal testing database.
    Hudson, VW
    Chang, HF
    Mashayekhi, B
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 72 : 219 - 219