The Cross-Talk Between Spinal Cord Stimulators and the Confirm™ Cardiac Monitor

被引:1
|
作者
Chaiban, Gassan Mitri [1 ]
Davidov, Mark [2 ]
Cummings, Jennifer Eiko [3 ]
Lehrian, Laura Elizabeth [2 ]
Yee, Eleanore Mun Yun [2 ]
Dugan, Amy [2 ]
Almualim, Mohammed Salman [1 ]
Atallah, Joseph N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Univ Toledo, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Med Ctr, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2014年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
ECG recording; electromagnetic interference; interaction; loop recorder; spinal cord stimulators; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; REFRACTORY ANGINA; PATIENT; NEUROSTIMULATORS; INTERFERENCE; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12060
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionSpinal cord stimulators (SCS) function by transmission of electrical impulses to electrode contacts placed within the epidural space depending on the painful area to be treated. Because of the electrical nature of the SCS, there has been concern about the interaction between these devices and devices that monitor or augment the cardiac system. Implantable loop recorders help to identify the causes of syncope or palpitation by continuously evaluating and recording portions of an electrocardiograph in patients being evaluated for cardiac conduction arrhythmias. The purpose of the study is to simulate the possible effects of spinal cord stimulation on a Confirm cardiac monitor (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). MethodsTwenty patients without preexisting cardiac disease, who were successfully being treated with SCS, were enrolled. Confirm loop recorders (St. Jude Medical) were placed on their chest wall in a noninvasive manner, with all programmed at identical settings. Multiple stimulation settings were adjusted on the stimulators and the recordings from the Confirm loop recorder were analyzed for evidence of interference. ResultsFifteen of the patients had no electrical noise detected at any of the tested combinations of stimulation. Five patients had some electrical noise detected by the loop recorder, but it did not inhibit the cardiologist evaluating the recording from analyzing the electrocardiograph for diagnostic purposes. At no point with any of the patients at any tested setting was there an appearance of a life-threatening arrhythmia. ConclusionOur study demonstrates that spinal cord stimulation is unlikely to interfere with the data collected by the Confirm loop recorder, and the presence of an SCS should not interfere with the ability to use a loop recorder for diagnostic purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PROGRAM COMPUTES CROSS-TALK BETWEEN CONDUCTORS
    GROSS, TB
    ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 1978, 50 (602): : 31 - 31
  • [22] Cross-talk between the gut microflora and the host
    Servin, Alain L.
    M S-MEDECINE SCIENCES, 2007, 23 (03): : 229 - 230
  • [23] More cross-talk between purinergic receptors
    Murrell-Lagnado, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2009, 587 (12): : 2713 - 2714
  • [24] Cross-talk between signaling and metabolism in the vasculature
    Uebelhoer, Melanie
    Iruela-Arispe, M. Luisa
    VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 83 : 4 - 9
  • [25] Cross-talk between iron metabolism and diabetes
    Fernández-Real, JM
    López-Bermejo, A
    Ricart, W
    DIABETES, 2002, 51 (08) : 2348 - 2354
  • [26] Metabolic cross-talk between diet and health
    O'Sullivan, Aifric
    NATURE FOOD, 2020, 1 (07): : 398 - 399
  • [27] The cross-talk between spirochetal lipoproteins and immunity
    Kelesidis, Theodoros
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [28] Cross-talk between ascending somatosensory systems
    Brown, AG
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1996, 495P : S12 - S12
  • [29] Cross-talk between enteric pathogens and the intestine
    Uzzau, S
    Fasano, A
    CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 2 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [30] The Cross-talk between Tristetraprolin and Cytokines in Cancer
    Guo, Jian
    Wang, Hao
    Jiang, Shiyi
    Xia, Jiazeng
    Jin, Shimao
    ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 17 (11) : 1477 - 1486