Microbial diagnosis of infection and colonization of cardiac implantable electronic devices by use of sonication

被引:18
|
作者
Inacio, Ricardo Cantarim [1 ]
Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui [2 ]
Murca, Maria Aparecida S. [3 ]
da Silva, Cely Barreto [3 ]
Nigro, Stanley [3 ]
Rivetti, Luiz Antonio [4 ]
Pereira, Wilson Lopes [4 ]
Costa Salles, Mauro Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Santa Casa Sao Paulo Sch Med Sci, Emergency Serv, BR-01303060 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Santa Casa Sao Paulo Sch Med Sci, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, BR-01303060 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Santa Casa Sao Paulo Sch Med Sci, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Div Infect Dis, BR-01303060 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Santa Casa Sao Paulo Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg, Div Infect Dis, BR-01303060 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Sonication; Cardiac implantable electronic devices; Biofilm; Colonization; Infection; BACTERIAL-COLONIZATION; MANAGEMENT; ENDOCARDITIS; PREVALENCE; PACEMAKER; CRITERIA; SOCIETY; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2015.07.018
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: The clinical utility of sonication as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for the microbial diagnosis of cardiac implantable device-associated infections (CIDAIs) was investigated. Methods: The implants of 83 subjects were investigated, 15 with a CIDAI and 68 without a clinical infection. Clinical data were analyzed prospectively and sonication fluid cultures (83 patients, 100%) and traditional cultures (31 patients, 37.4%) were performed Results: Generator pocket infection and device-related endocarditis were found in 13 (86.7%) and four (26.7%) subjects, respectively. The mean numbers of previous technical complications and infections were higher in the infected patients compared to the non-infected patients (8 vs. 1, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 0, p < 0.031, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIDAI was 73.3% (11/15) and 48.5% (33/68) for sonication fluid culture, and 26.7% (4/15) and 100% (16/16) for traditional culture (p < 0.001), respectively. A higher number of organisms were identified by sonication fluid than by tissue culture (58 vs. 4 specimens; p < 0.001). The most frequent organisms cultured were Gram-positive cocci (66.1%), mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (35.5%). Thirty-five (51.5%) non-infected subjects were considered colonized due to the positive identification of organisms exclusively through sonication fluid culture. Conclusions: Sonication fluid culture from the removed cardiac implants has the potential to improve the microbiological diagnosis of CIDAIs. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 59
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Guidelines for the diagnosis, management and prevention of implantable cardiac electronic device infection
    Harrison, James L.
    Prendergast, Bernard D.
    Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
    HEART, 2015, 101 (04) : 250 - 252
  • [32] A meta-analysis on the role of sonication in the diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic device-related infections
    Araujo, Daniela
    Martins, Joao P.
    Ferreira, Stephanie Lopes
    Mota, Sandra
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    Pimenta, Rui
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [33] Microbiological diagnosis in cardiac implantable electronic device infections detected by sonication and next-generation sequencing
    Olsen, Thomas
    Justesen, Ulrik Stenz
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    Jorgensen, Ole Dan
    Sandgaard, Niels Christian Foldager
    Ravn, Christen
    Gerdes, Christian
    Thogersen, Anna Margrethe
    Gill, Sabine
    Fuursted, Kurt
    Johansen, Jens Brock
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (06) : 901 - 908
  • [34] Assessment of Association Between Venous Occlusion and Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Keyser, Andreas
    Jungbauer, Carsten
    Rennert, Janine
    Linnemann, Birgit
    Schmid, Christof
    Schopka, Simon
    ANGIOLOGY, 2022, 73 (03) : 252 - 259
  • [35] Cardiac MRI for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Stojanovska, Jadranka
    Runge, Mason
    Mahani, Maryam Ghadimi
    Cronin, Paul P.
    Sayyouh, Mohamed
    Bogun, Frank
    Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (02) : 374 - 381
  • [36] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection Management: Gaps Between Guidelines and Patients
    Dore, Michael M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 207 : 518 - 519
  • [37] Percutaneous Lead Extraction in Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Systematic Review
    Menezes Junior, Antonio da Silva
    Magalhaes, Thais Rodrigues
    Alarcao Morais, Alana de Oliveira
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 33 (02) : 194 - 202
  • [38] Advances in implantable cardiac electronic devices and cardiac electrophysiology
    Denniss, Alan Robert
    Davis, Lloyd M.
    Sanders, Prashanthan
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2012, 21 (6-7): : 309 - 310
  • [39] Cardiac implantable electronic device infection
    Lambert, Cameron T.
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 84 : 47 - 53
  • [40] Current impact of cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Kuschyk, J.
    Rudic, B.
    Borggrefe, M.
    Akin, I.
    HERZ, 2017, 42 (02) : 151 - 161