A method for calibrating the CT-based attenuation correction of PET in human tissue

被引:20
|
作者
Watson, CC [1 ]
Rappoport, V
Faul, D
Townsend, DW
Carney, JP
机构
[1] Siemens Mol Imaging, Knoxville, TN 37932 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Med Ctr, Knoxville, TN 37920 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
attenuation correction; human tissue; linear attenuation coefficient; PET; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1109/TNS.2005.862972
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The use of x-ray computed tomography (CT)-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography (PET) in PET/CT systems requires the transformation of CT Hounsfield units (HU) to linear attenuation coefficients at 511 keV (LAC(511)). This cannot be done perfectly from a single peak kilovolt (kVp) CT scan due to variability in Compton and photoelectric composition and, thus, an approximate transformation must be employed. One difficulty in this lies in accurately determining the linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) in actual human tissue. Typically, phantoms consisting of synthetic materials thought to be approximate human tissue equivalents are employed instead. A potentially more accurate approach would be to use dual kVp CT scans to estimate LAC511 in actual human tissue and then base the single kVp transformation on these data. This approach would also permit an assessment of the dispersion of actual tissue values about the two-component trend lines typically used for the single kVp transformation. In this paper, we develop and assess this methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of different CT-based attenuation correction schemes for PET with respiratory motion.
    Qi, J
    Huesman, RH
    Reutter, BW
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (05) : 38P - 38P
  • [32] Comparative Assessment of Energy-Mapping Approaches in CT-Based Attenuation Correction for PET
    Mohammad R. Ay
    Maryam Shirmohammad
    Saeed Sarkar
    Arman Rahmim
    Habib Zaidi
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2011, 13 : 187 - 198
  • [33] Impact of Ge-68-based versus CT-based attenuation correction on PET imaging
    van Dalen, J. A.
    Visser, E. P.
    Vogel, W. V.
    Corstens, F. H. M.
    Oyen, W. J. G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S314 - S315
  • [34] Simulation-based Assessment of the Impact of Contrast Medium on CT-based Attenuation Correction in PET
    Ay, Mohamad Reza
    Zaidi, Habib
    2006 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOL 1-6, 2006, : 2731 - 2735
  • [35] Direct Reconstruction of CT-Based Attenuation Correction Images for PET With Cluster-Based Penalties
    Kim, Soo Mee
    Alessio, Adam M.
    De Man, Bruno
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2017, 64 (03) : 959 - 968
  • [36] Effect of oral contrast agents on CT-based PET attenuation correction in dual-modality PET/CT tomography
    Antoch, G
    Jentzen, W
    Stattaus, J
    Mueller, SP
    Bockisch, A
    Debatin, JF
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 423 - 424
  • [37] PET emission activities after 68GE-transmission correction or CT-based attenuation correction
    Buck, A
    Gubler, G
    Goerres, G
    Ross, S
    Ronn, A
    Altman, H
    Tokman, A
    vonSchulthess, G
    Burger, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (08): : 969 - 969
  • [38] Impact of transient oral contrast agent on CT-based attenuation correction in combined PET/CT studies
    Burger, CN
    Dizendorf, EV
    Hany, TF
    Buck, A
    Von Schulthess, GK
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 409 - 409
  • [39] A Curve Fitting Approach Using ANN for Converting CT Number to Linear Attenuation Coefficient for CT-based PET Attenuation Correction
    Lai, Chia-Lin
    Lee, Jhih-Shian
    Chen, Jyh-Cheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2015, 62 (01) : 164 - 170
  • [40] Comparison of Template-Based Versus CT-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid MR/PET Scanners
    Kops, Elena Rota
    Hautzel, Hubertus
    Herzog, Hans
    Antoch, Gerald
    Shah, N. Jon
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2015, 62 (05) : 2115 - 2121