Expression of key oestrogen-regulated genes differs substantially across the menstrual cycle in oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer

被引:39
|
作者
Haynes, Ben P. [1 ]
Viale, Giuseppe [2 ,3 ]
Galimberti, Viviana [4 ]
Rotmensz, Nicole [5 ]
Gibelli, Bianca [6 ]
A'Hern, Roger [7 ]
Smith, Ian E. [8 ]
Dowsett, Mitch [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Acad Biochem, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Univ Milan, Sch Med, Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Div Pathol, Milan, Italy
[4] European Inst Oncol, Div Senol, Milan, Italy
[5] European Inst Oncol, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Milan, Italy
[6] European Inst Oncol, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Milan, Italy
[7] Inst Canc Res, Canc Res UK Clin Trials & Stat Unit, Sutton, Surrey, England
[8] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Med, London SW3 6JJ, England
[9] Inst Canc Res, Breakthrough Breast Canc Ctr, London SW3 6JB, England
关键词
Premenopausal; Estradiol; Oestrogen-regulated; Menstrual cycle; Oestrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; HORMONE; SURGERY; TAMOXIFEN; RECURRENCE; PREDICTOR; ESTRADIOL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2426-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Plasma estradiol (E2) and progesterone vary markedly through the menstrual cycle. Data on whether these differences in hormone levels affect gene expression in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours are inconsistent. We wished to determine whether there are substantial changes in the expression of oestrogen-regulated genes (ERGs) in ER+ breast cancer through the menstrual cycle. One hundred and seventy five paraffin-embedded ER+ breast carcinomas from premenopausal patients were analysed. Timing of the ovarian cycle was confirmed using serum progesterone levels. Patients were ascribed to one of three pre-defined menstrual cycle windows: 1 (days 27-35 + 1-6), 2 (days 7-16) and 3 (days 17-26). The RNA expression of ESR1, four ERGs (PGR, GREB1, TFF1 and PDZK1), and three proliferation genes (MKI67, TOP2A and CDC20) were compared between the windows. Gene expression of the four ERGs was 53-129 % higher in window 2 than window 1 (p = 0.0013, 0.0006, 0.022 and 0.066 for PGR, GREB1, TFF1 and PDZK1, respectively) and lower (9-41 %) in window 3 compared to window 2 (p = 0.079, 0.31, 0.031 and 0.065 for PGR, GREB1, TFF1 and PDZK1, respectively). Their average expression (AvERG) was 64 % higher in window 2 than window 1 (p < 0.0001) and 21 % lower in window 3 than window 2 (p = 0.0043). There were no significant differences between the windows for ESR1 and proliferation genes. In agreement with the gene expression data, progesterone receptor protein levels measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were 164 and 227 % higher in windows 2 and 3, respectively, compared to window 1 (30.7 and 37.9 % cells positive vs. 11.6 %; p = 0.0003 and 0.0004, respectively), while no difference in ER IHC score was observed. In conclusion, we observed significant differences in the expression of ERGs in ER+ breast tumours across the menstrual cycle. This variability may affect the interpretation of gene expression profiles incorporating ERGs and may be exploitable as an endogenous test of endocrine responsiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prognostic significance of tumour-stroma ratio in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Downey, C. L.
    Simpkins, S. A.
    White, J.
    Holliday, D. L.
    Jones, J. L.
    Jordan, L. B.
    Kulka, J.
    Pollock, S.
    Rajan, S. S.
    Thygesen, H. H.
    Hanby, A. M.
    Speirs, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (07) : 1744 - 1747
  • [32] Oestrogen deprivation induces chemokine production and immune cell recruitment in in vitro and in vivo models of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Jody Hazlett
    Virginia Niemi
    Aziz Aiderus
    Katelyn Powell
    Lyn Wise
    Roslyn Kemp
    Anita K. Dunbier
    Breast Cancer Research, 23
  • [33] Oestrogen deprivation induces chemokine production and immune cell recruitment in in vitro and in vivo models of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Hazlett, Jody
    Niemi, Virginia
    Aiderus, Aziz
    Powell, Katelyn
    Wise, Lyn
    Kemp, Roslyn
    Dunbier, Anita K.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01)
  • [34] Mechanisms responsible for oestrogen receptor expression in primary human breast cancer
    Sharma, AK
    Grimshaw, D
    Horgan, K
    Mansel, RE
    Gee, JMW
    Nicholson, RI
    BREAST, 1996, 5 (04): : 237 - 243
  • [35] Differences in expression of proliferation-associated genes and RANKL across the menstrual cycle in estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer (vol 148, pg 327, 2014)
    Haynes, Ben P.
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Galimberti, Viviana
    Rotmensz, Nicole
    Gibelli, Bianca
    Smith, Ian E.
    Dowsett, Mitch
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 149 (01) : 311 - 311
  • [36] Modulation of epidermal growth factor receptor in endocrine-resistant, oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Nicholson, RI
    Hutcheson, IR
    Harper, ME
    Knowlden, JM
    Barrow, D
    McClelland, RA
    Jones, HE
    Wakeling, AE
    Gee, JMW
    ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2001, 8 (03) : 175 - 182
  • [37] Comment on: The prognostic significance of tumour-stroma ratio in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    W E Mesker
    T J A Dekker
    E M de Kruijf
    C C Engels
    G W van Pelt
    V T H B M Smit
    R A E M Tollenaar
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : 1832 - 1833
  • [38] Role of LHRH agonists in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: the ZEBRA experience
    Jonat, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 : S39 - S40
  • [39] Clinical and molecular predictors of very late recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients
    Richman, Juliet
    Schuster, Gene
    Buus, Richard
    Lopez-Knowles, Elena
    Dowsett, Mitch
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 206 (01) : 195 - 205
  • [40] Oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: identification of significant prognostic patho-biological subgroups
    Onsy, Habashy H.
    Powe, C. D.
    Ball, G.
    Ellis, I. O.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2009, 455 : 73 - 73