Expression of key oestrogen-regulated genes differs substantially across the menstrual cycle in oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer

被引:39
|
作者
Haynes, Ben P. [1 ]
Viale, Giuseppe [2 ,3 ]
Galimberti, Viviana [4 ]
Rotmensz, Nicole [5 ]
Gibelli, Bianca [6 ]
A'Hern, Roger [7 ]
Smith, Ian E. [8 ]
Dowsett, Mitch [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Acad Biochem, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Univ Milan, Sch Med, Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Div Pathol, Milan, Italy
[4] European Inst Oncol, Div Senol, Milan, Italy
[5] European Inst Oncol, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Milan, Italy
[6] European Inst Oncol, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Milan, Italy
[7] Inst Canc Res, Canc Res UK Clin Trials & Stat Unit, Sutton, Surrey, England
[8] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Med, London SW3 6JJ, England
[9] Inst Canc Res, Breakthrough Breast Canc Ctr, London SW3 6JB, England
关键词
Premenopausal; Estradiol; Oestrogen-regulated; Menstrual cycle; Oestrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; HORMONE; SURGERY; TAMOXIFEN; RECURRENCE; PREDICTOR; ESTRADIOL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2426-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Plasma estradiol (E2) and progesterone vary markedly through the menstrual cycle. Data on whether these differences in hormone levels affect gene expression in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours are inconsistent. We wished to determine whether there are substantial changes in the expression of oestrogen-regulated genes (ERGs) in ER+ breast cancer through the menstrual cycle. One hundred and seventy five paraffin-embedded ER+ breast carcinomas from premenopausal patients were analysed. Timing of the ovarian cycle was confirmed using serum progesterone levels. Patients were ascribed to one of three pre-defined menstrual cycle windows: 1 (days 27-35 + 1-6), 2 (days 7-16) and 3 (days 17-26). The RNA expression of ESR1, four ERGs (PGR, GREB1, TFF1 and PDZK1), and three proliferation genes (MKI67, TOP2A and CDC20) were compared between the windows. Gene expression of the four ERGs was 53-129 % higher in window 2 than window 1 (p = 0.0013, 0.0006, 0.022 and 0.066 for PGR, GREB1, TFF1 and PDZK1, respectively) and lower (9-41 %) in window 3 compared to window 2 (p = 0.079, 0.31, 0.031 and 0.065 for PGR, GREB1, TFF1 and PDZK1, respectively). Their average expression (AvERG) was 64 % higher in window 2 than window 1 (p < 0.0001) and 21 % lower in window 3 than window 2 (p = 0.0043). There were no significant differences between the windows for ESR1 and proliferation genes. In agreement with the gene expression data, progesterone receptor protein levels measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were 164 and 227 % higher in windows 2 and 3, respectively, compared to window 1 (30.7 and 37.9 % cells positive vs. 11.6 %; p = 0.0003 and 0.0004, respectively), while no difference in ER IHC score was observed. In conclusion, we observed significant differences in the expression of ERGs in ER+ breast tumours across the menstrual cycle. This variability may affect the interpretation of gene expression profiles incorporating ERGs and may be exploitable as an endogenous test of endocrine responsiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implications of obesity and insulin resistance for the treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Javed, Sohail Rooman
    Skolariki, Aglaia
    Zameer, Mohammed Zeeshan
    Lord, Simon R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 131 (11) : 1724 - 1736
  • [22] The prognostic significance of tumour–stroma ratio in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    C L Downey
    S A Simpkins
    J White
    D L Holliday
    J L Jones
    L B Jordan
    J Kulka
    S Pollock
    S S Rajan
    H H Thygesen
    A M Hanby
    V Speirs
    British Journal of Cancer, 2014, 110 : 1744 - 1747
  • [23] Exemestane as primary treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a phase II trial
    A Barnadas
    M Gil
    S González
    I Tusquets
    M Muñoz
    A Arcusa
    L Prieto
    M Margelí-Vila
    A Moreno
    British Journal of Cancer, 2009, 100 : 442 - 449
  • [24] Exemestane as primary treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a phase II trial
    Barnadas, A.
    Gil, M.
    Gonzalez, S.
    Tusquets, I.
    Munoz, M.
    Arcusa, A.
    Prieto, L.
    Margeli-Vila, M.
    Moreno, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (03) : 442 - 449
  • [25] Molecular changes in premenopausal oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer in Vietnamese women after oophorectomy
    Ben P. Haynes
    Ophira Ginsburg
    Qiong Gao
    Elizabeth Folkerd
    Maria Afentakis
    Le Hong Quang
    Pham Thi Han
    Pham Hong Khoa
    Nguyen Van Dinh
    Ta Van To
    Mark Clemons
    Ian E. Smith
    Mitch Dowsett
    npj Breast Cancer, 3
  • [26] Molecular changes in premenopausal oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer in Vietnamese women after oophorectomy
    Haynes, Ben P.
    Ginsburg, Ophira
    Gao, Qiong
    Folkerd, Elizabeth
    Afentakis, Maria
    Le Hong Quang
    Pham Thi Han
    Pham Hong Khoa
    Nguyen Van Dinh
    Ta Van To
    Clemons, Mark
    Smith, Ian E.
    Dowsett, Mitch
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2017, 3
  • [27] Tamoxifen-Induced Epigenetic Silencing of Oestrogen-Regulated Genes in Anti-Hormone Resistant Breast Cancer
    Stone, Andrew
    Valdes-Mora, Fatima
    Gee, Julia M. W.
    Farrow, Lynne
    McClelland, Richard A.
    Fiegl, Heidi
    Dutkowski, Carol
    McCloy, Rachael A.
    Sutherland, Robert L.
    Musgrove, Elizabeth A.
    Nicholson, Robert I.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07):
  • [28] The prognostic significance of tumou-stroma ratio in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Krishnamurthy, S.
    Breast Diseases, 2015, 26 (01): : 53 - 55
  • [29] Beyond 5 years: enduring risk of recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Juliet Richman
    Mitch Dowsett
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2019, 16 : 296 - 311
  • [30] Beyond 5 years: enduring risk of recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Richman, Juliet
    Dowsett, Mitch
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 16 (05) : 296 - 311