Sample Acquisition and Caching Architecture for the Mars Sample Return Mission

被引:0
|
作者
Zacny, Kris [1 ]
Chu, Philip [1 ]
Cohen, Joanna [1 ]
Paulsen, Gale [1 ]
Craft, Jack [1 ]
Szwarc, Timothy
机构
[1] Honeybee Robot, Pasadena, CA 91103 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Acquisition and Caching (SAC) study developed for the three rover platforms: MER, MER+, and MSL. The study took into account 26 SAC requirements provided by the NASA Mars Exploration Program Office. For this SAC architecture, the reduction of mission risk was chosen by us as having greater priority than mass or volume. For this reason, we selected a "One Bit per Core" approach. The enabling technology for this architecture is Honeybee Robotics' "eccentric tubes" core breakoff approach. The breakoff approach allows the drill bits to be relatively small in diameter and in turn lightweight. Hence, the bits could be returned to Earth with the cores inside them with only a modest increase to the total returned mass, but a significant decrease in complexity. Having dedicated bits allows a reduction in the number of core transfer steps and actuators. It also alleviates the bit life problem, eliminates cross contamination, and aids in hermetic sealing. An added advantage is faster drilling time, lower power, lower energy, and lower Weight on Bit (which reduces Arm preload requirements). Drill bits are based on the BigTooth bit concept, which allows re-use of the same bit multiple times, if necessary. The proposed SAC consists of a 1) Rotary-Percussive Core Drill, 2) Bit Storage Carousel, 3) Cache, 4) Robotic Arm, and 5) Rock Abrasion and Brushing Bit (RABBit), which is deployed using the Drill. The system also includes PreView bits (for viewing of cores prior to caching) and Powder bits for acquisition of regolith or cuttings. The SAC total system mass is less than 22 kg for MER and MER+ size rovers and less than 32 kg for the MSL-size rover.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mars Sample Return spacecraft systems architecture
    Price, H
    Cramer, K
    Doudrick, S
    Lee, W
    Matijevic, J
    Weinstein, S
    Lam-Trong, T
    Marsal, O
    Mitcheltree, R
    2000 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL 7, 2000, : 357 - 375
  • [22] Surface Sample Acquisition and Caching Device for Chinese Lunar Sample Return Plan
    Li, Cao
    Xie, Zongwu
    Liu, Hong
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS (ROBIO), 2013, : 2599 - 2604
  • [23] Electric transfer optimization for Mars Sample Return mission
    Bertrand, R
    Bernussou, J
    Geffroy, S
    Epenoy, R
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2001, 48 (5-12) : 651 - 660
  • [24] Technology development plans for the Mars Sample Return mission
    Mattingly, Richard
    Hayati, Samad
    Udomkesmalee, Gabriel
    2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Vols 1-4, 2005, : 982 - 995
  • [25] US, France eye Mars sample return mission
    Taverna, MA
    Mann, P
    AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 148 (26): : 27 - +
  • [26] US weighs Mars sample-return mission
    Scott, WB
    AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 144 (07): : 52 - 53
  • [27] Preliminary orbit design for a Mars sample return mission
    Wang ZhongSheng
    Zhou WenYan
    Tian Baiyi
    Zhang Lei
    Peng Jing
    SCIENTIA SINICA-PHYSICA MECHANICA & ASTRONOMICA, 2019, 49 (02)
  • [28] APPLICATION OF AEROASSIST TO THE MARS ROVER SAMPLE RETURN MISSION
    WILLCOCKSON, B
    ORBITAL MECHANICS AND MISSION DESIGN, 1989, 69 : 625 - 650
  • [29] A comparison of alternative methods for the Mars sample return mission
    Zubrin, RM
    CASE FOR MARS VI: MAKING MARS AN AFFORDABLE DESTINATION, 2000, 98 : 257 - 265
  • [30] Rendezvous options and dynamics for mars sample return mission
    Ocampo, C
    Guinn, J
    Breeden, J
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2001, PTS I-III, 2001, 109 : 1661 - 1680