Constraining the uncertainty in emissions over India with a regional air quality model evaluation

被引:24
|
作者
Karambelas, Alexandra [1 ]
Holloway, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
Kiesewetter, Gregor [3 ]
Heyes, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Nelson Inst Ctr Sustainabil & Global Environm, 1710 Univ Ave, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, 1225 West Dayton St, Madison, WI USA
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Air Pollut & Greenhouse Gases, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
India; Model; Satellite; OMI; NO2; Emissions; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; THERMAL POWER-PLANTS; NOX EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; HUMAN HEALTH; EAST-ASIA; OZONE; INVENTORY; TRANSPORT; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To evaluate uncertainty in the spatial distribution of air emissions over India, we compare satellite and surface observations with simulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Seasonally representative simulations were completed for January, April, July, and October 2010 at 36 km x 36 km using anthropogenic emissions from the Greenhouse Gas-Air Pollution Interaction and Synergies (GAINS) model following version 5a of the Evaluating the Climate and Air Quality Impacts of Short-Lived Pollutants project (ECLIPSE v5a). We use both tropospheric columns from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and surface observations from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to closely examine modeled nitrogen dioxide (NO2) biases in urban and rural regions across India. Spatial average evaluation with satellite retrievals indicate a low bias in the modeled tropospheric column (63.3%), which reflects broad low-biases in majority non-urban regions (-70.1% in rural areas) across the sub-continent to slightly lesser low biases reflected in semi-urban areas (-44.7%), with the threshold between semi-urban and rural defined as 400 people per km(2). In contrast, modeled surface NO2 concentrations exhibit a slight high bias of +15.6% when compared to surface CPCB observations predominantly located in urban areas. Conversely, in examining extremely population dense urban regions with more than 5000 people per km(2) (dense-urban), we find model overestimates in both the column (+ 57.8) and at the surface (+131.2%) compared to observations. Based on these results, we find that existing emission fields for India may overestimate urban emissions in densely populated regions and underestimate rural emissions. However, if we rely on model evaluation with predominantly urban surface observations from the CPCB, comparisons reflect model high biases, contradictory to the knowledge gained using satellite observations. Satellites thus serve as an important emissions and model evaluation metric where surface observations are lacking, such as rural India, and support improved emissions inventory development.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Skill and uncertainty of a regional air quality model ensemble
    Vautard, R.
    Schaap, M.
    Bergstrom, R.
    Bessagnet, B.
    Brandt, J.
    Builtjes, P. J. H.
    Christensen, J. H.
    Cuvelier, C.
    Foltescu, V.
    Graff, A.
    Kerschbaumer, A.
    Krol, M.
    Roberts, P.
    Rouil, L.
    Stern, R.
    Tarrason, L.
    Thunis, P.
    Vignati, E.
    Wind, P.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (31) : 4822 - 4832
  • [2] AIR-QUALITY MODEL EVALUATION AND UNCERTAINTY
    HANNA, SR
    [J]. JAPCA-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT, 1988, 38 (04): : 406 - 412
  • [3] Uncertainties in emissions estimates of greenhouse gases and air pollutants in India and their impacts on regional air quality
    Saikawa, Eri
    Trail, Marcus
    Zhong, Min
    Wu, Qianru
    Young, Cindy L.
    Janssens-Maenhout, Greet
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    Wagner, Fabian
    Kurokawa, Jun-ichi
    Nagpure, Ajay Singh
    Gurjar, Bhola Ram
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [4] Dynamic evaluation of a regional air quality model: Assessing the emissions-induced weekly ozone cycle
    Pierce, Thomas
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Rao, S. Trivikrama
    Porter, P. Steven
    Ku, Jia-Yeong
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 44 (29) : 3583 - 3596
  • [5] Is regional air quality model diversity representative of uncertainty for ozone simulation?
    Vautard, R.
    Van Loon, M.
    Schaap, M.
    Bergstroem, R.
    Bessagnet, B.
    Brandt, J.
    Builtjes, P. J. H.
    Christensen, J. H.
    Cuvelier, C.
    Graff, A.
    Jonson, J. E.
    Krol, M.
    Langner, J.
    Roberts, P.
    Rouil, L.
    Stern, R.
    Tarrason, L.
    Thunis, P.
    Vignati, E.
    White, L.
    Wind, P.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (24)
  • [6] Regional air quality: biomass burning impacts of SO2 emissions on air quality in the Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India
    Alok Sagar Gautam
    Sanjeev Kumar
    Sneha Gautam
    Karan Singh
    Kripa Ram
    Devendraa Siingh
    Balram Ambade
    Manish Sharma
    [J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2024, 17 : 1 - 18
  • [7] Regional air quality: biomass burning impacts of SO2 emissions on air quality in the Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India
    Gautam, Alok Sagar
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Gautam, Sneha
    Singh, Karan
    Ram, Kripa
    Siingh, Devendraa
    Ambade, Balram
    Sharma, Manish
    [J]. AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2024, 17 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [8] ARAMIS a regional air quality model for air pollution management: evaluation and validation
    Rosa Soler, Mara
    Gamez, Pedro
    Olid, Miriam
    [J]. FISICA DE LA TIERRA, 2015, 27 : 111 - 136
  • [9] Evaluation of emissions and air quality in megacities
    Gurjar, B. R.
    Butler, T. M.
    Lawrence, M. G.
    Lelieveld, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (07) : 1593 - 1606
  • [10] Evaluation of a regional air quality model using satellite column NO2: treatment of observation errors and model boundary conditions and emissions
    Pope, R. J.
    Chipperfield, M. P.
    Savage, N. H.
    Ordonez, C.
    Neal, L. S.
    Lee, L. A.
    Dhomse, S. S.
    Richards, N. A. D.
    Keslake, T. D.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (10) : 5611 - 5626