AIIB on Chinese Enterprises Overseas Investment Decisions based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:0
|
作者
Liu Wei [1 ]
Tian Ye [1 ]
Gao Jia Feng [2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Jianzhu Univ, Changchun 130118, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Yatai Real Estate Dev Co Ltd, Changchun 130028, Peoples R China
关键词
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB); the construction of Enterprises; Investment decision;
D O I
10.1109/ICSCSE.2016.18
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current Chinese economy has entered a new normal, construction engineering field with its related industries are facing the pressure of upgrading and transferring. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is an important measure as a response to the current situation of China, it will be beneficial to promote multilateral institutions on developing countries and emerging economies infrastructure construction investment, having a significant impact on the investment the construction of enterprise foreign infrastructure decisions. Based on the theory of hierarchy analysis way of thinking, it analyzes the influence factors of AIIB for infrastructure projects decision-making, both for construction enterprises solve the problem of funding problems, information integration, the leading role of coordination or competition related industries at home and abroad have significant spillover effects, and thus to a certain extent, to provide reference for China's construction industry enterprises outside engineering decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 264
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Researches on Overseas R&D Investment of Chinese Enterprises*-Based on the Case Study of HUAWEI and DMTG
    Du Qunyang
    Dai Yuanyuan
    ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PT 1, 2010, : 117 - +
  • [32] Study of chinese airport punctuality based on analytic hierarchy process and correlation analysis
    Gu, C.G.
    Zhang, D.
    Yang, Y.
    Advances in Transportation Studies, 2015, 1 : 127 - 134
  • [33] Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for integrating environmental considerations into process design decisions
    Dechapanya, W
    Rogers, TN
    Baker, JR
    Radecki, PP
    TOOLS AND METHODS FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION, 1999, 62 : 367 - 383
  • [34] Determination of Indicator Weight for Job Evaluation in Private Electronics Enterprises Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Fan, Chunlan
    Gao, Dianjun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PUBLIC POLICY (ICMIPP 2012), VOLS 1-6, 2012, : 3645 - 3648
  • [35] Weighting of performance index by analytic hierarchy process for water supply enterprises
    Sun, Wan
    Wang, Junling
    Feng, Cuimin
    Cao, Ping
    Han, Wei
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 409-410 : 1004 - +
  • [36] The Performance Evaluation of Logistics Enterprises in Online Supply Chain Finance Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Meng, Jinhuan
    Wang, Shujie
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [37] Decisor: A Software Tool to Drive Complex Decisions with Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Czekster, Ricardo M.
    De Carvalho, Henrique Jung
    Kessler, Gabriela Zucchetti
    Kipper, Liane Mahlmann
    Webber, Thais
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2019, 18 (01) : 65 - 86
  • [38] Investment Risk Analysis of Gas and Pipeline Construction Project Based on the Gray Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Mu, Lin-lin
    Bi, Xing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 2014, 2015, : 467 - 471
  • [39] Process Analysis and Reengineering based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Cao, Xian-Nian
    He, Yu-Min
    He, Zhong-Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ANNUAL 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (MSE 2017), 2017, 50 : 157 - 160
  • [40] Project Appraisement of Venture Investment by Analytic Hierarchy Process and Factor Analysis
    Wang, Honglei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 233 - 236