A review of available chargers for electric vehicles: United States of America, European Union, and Asia

被引:60
|
作者
Knez, Matjaz [1 ]
Zevnik, Gasper Kozelj [1 ]
Obrecht, Matevz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Logist, Mariborska Cesta 7, Celje 3000, Slovenia
来源
关键词
Electric vehicles; Energy policy; Charger; Charging infrastructure; Automotive market; INFRASTRUCTURE; INCENTIVES; STANDARDS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research focuses on the incompatibility of chargers for electric vehicles between different vehicle brands and types. The basics of electric vehicles and their charging are presented. The three biggest electric vehicle markets (United States of America, European Union, and Asia) were studied to establish which electric vehicles and consequently what kind of chargers were sold between 2013 and 2015 and to examine the market share of existing chargers for all three studied markets. A short overview of various countries' policies for these markets is included as regards promoting and favouring electric vehicles and standardizing the chargers. This study has revealed that the most common charger in the USA is J1772, in the European Union Mennekes and in China GB/T. The number of J1772 and CHAdeMO chargers is decreasing rapidly, while Mennekes (which also has the highest share) and especially GB/T chargers are on the rise. China also made the most significant breakthrough in 2015 with GB/T as a leading charger type.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 293
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life in the European Union and the United States of America: Evidence from comprehensive indices
    Glatzer W.
    [J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2006, 1 (2) : 169 - 188
  • [22] The agricultural subsidies in international trade: the policies adopted by the European Union and the United States of America
    Rodrigues Bruno, Flavio Marcelo
    Zago de Azevedo, Andre Filipe
    Massuquetti, Angelica
    [J]. CIENCIA RURAL, 2012, 42 (04): : 757 - 764
  • [23] Assessing the efficiency and the justice of energy transformation for the United States of America, China, and the European Union
    Liu, Pingkuo
    Zhao, Ruiqi
    Han, Xue
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (05) : 3387 - 3407
  • [24] Regional Trade Agreements and the Neo-Colonialism of the United States of America and the European Union: A Review of the Principle of Competitive Imperialism
    Puig, Gonzalo Villalta
    Ohiocheoya, Omiunu
    [J]. LIVERPOOL LAW REVIEW, 2011, 32 (03): : 225 - 235
  • [25] China, United States of America and Europe Union
    Accattatis, Vincenzo
    [J]. PONTE, 2014, 70 (03) : 79 - 81
  • [26] United States and European Union Evolving Approaches in Southeast Asia: Moving Closer to Convergence or Divergence?
    di Floristella, Angela Pennisi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CURRENT SOUTHEAST ASIAN AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (02) : 172 - 193
  • [27] Exploring the suitability of electric vehicles in the United States
    Onat, Nuri C.
    Noori, Mehdi
    Kucular, Murat
    Zhao, Yang
    Tatari, Omer
    Chester, Mikhail
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 121 : 631 - 642
  • [28] UNITED-STATES PROMOTES ELECTRIC VEHICLES
    ESPOSITO, VJ
    [J]. IEEE SPECTRUM, 1977, 14 (11) : 69 - 69
  • [29] Expedited Drug Review Processes for Approval in the United States and European Union with an Illustration
    Ch, Ssnd Balakrishna
    Dwarapudi, Sai Pavan
    Juturi, Ravi Kumar Reddy
    Raju, Venkateswara K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 11 (02) : 137 - 142
  • [30] Socioeconomic Costs of Asthma in the European Union, United States and Canada: A Systematic Review
    Puig-Junoy, Jaume
    Pascual-Argente, Natalia
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2017, 91