Value for the future and breast cancer-preventive health behavior

被引:16
|
作者
Levy, Andrea Gurmankin
Micco, Ellyn
Putt, Mary
Armstrong, Katrina
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Community Based Res, Boston, MA 02446 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Soc Human Dev & Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0169
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Time preference, or the extent to which people discount future benefits in favor of immediate benefits, might represent an important determinant of preventive health behavior, but the little research thus far on this association has yielded mixed results. This study examined the association between future time preference and use of genetic counseling for BRCA1/2 testing and how this association may differ from the relationship between future time preference and mammography screening and self-breast examination. Experimental Design: A health system-based case-control study with a nested cross-sectional survey. Eight hundred women who saw a primary care physician in the University of Pennsylvania Health System in the 3 years before the study, of whom 234 had undergone BRCA1/2 counseling (cases) and of whom 566 had not (controls). Results: Placing a relatively greater value on future benefits than present benefits was strongly associated with use of BRCA1/2 counseling [odds ratio (OR), 3.0 for one-point increase in future time preference; 95% confidence intervals (0), 1.9-4.9]. Future time preference was weakly associated with adherence to annual mammography (OR, 1.3; 95% Cl, 0.81-2.2), and was not associated with monthly self-breast examination (OR, 1.03; 95% Cl, 0.75-1.4). A stronger future orientation was seen in women who had higher levels of education (P = 0.0021) or income (P = 0.0011). Conclusion: Time preference is strongly associated with use of BRCA1/2 counseling. Time preference is more weakly associated with mammography adherence and is not associated with breast self-examination. This variation may reflect the degree to which the behavior is seen as related to future risk.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 960
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cancer-preventive isothiocyanates: measurement of human exposure and mechanism of action
    Zhang, YS
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2004, 555 (1-2) : 173 - 190
  • [33] Assessing intraepithelial neoplasia and drug safety in cancer-preventive drug development
    Gary J. Kelloff
    Caroline C. Sigman
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2007, 7 : 508 - 518
  • [34] The cancer-preventive potential of Panax ginseng: a review of human and experimental evidence
    Hai Rim Shin
    Joon Youn Kim
    Taik Koo Yun
    Gareth Morgan
    Harri Vainio
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2000, 11 : 565 - 576
  • [35] Bifidobacterium animalis: the missing link for the cancer-preventive effect of Gynostemma pentaphyllum
    Liao, Weilin
    Khan, Imran
    Huang, Guoxin
    Chen, Shengshuang
    Liu, Liang
    Leong, Wai Kit
    Li, Xiao Ang
    Wu, Jianlin
    Wendy Hsiao, W. L.
    GUT MICROBES, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [36] FLAVORANTS FROM GARLIC, ONION, AND OTHER ALLIUMS AND THEIR CANCER-PREVENTIVE PROPERTIES
    BLOCK, E
    FOOD PHYTOCHEMICALS FOR CANCER PREVENTION I: FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, 1994, 546 : 84 - 96
  • [37] Cancer-preventive effects of drinking green tea among a Japanese population
    Imai, K
    Suga, K
    Nakachi, K
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 26 (06) : 769 - 775
  • [38] Evaluation of cancer-preventive agents and strategies - A new program at the International Agency for Research on Cancer
    Vainio, H
    Bianchini, F
    CANCER PREVENTION: MOLECULAR MECHANISMS TO CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, 2001, 952 : 177 - 180
  • [39] Multiple Health Behavior Research represents the future of preventive medicine
    Prochaska, James O.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 46 (03) : 281 - 285
  • [40] Can we change physicians' practices in the delivery of cancer-preventive services?
    Ruffin, MT
    ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1998, 7 (04) : 317 - 319