Value for the future and breast cancer-preventive health behavior

被引:16
|
作者
Levy, Andrea Gurmankin
Micco, Ellyn
Putt, Mary
Armstrong, Katrina
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Community Based Res, Boston, MA 02446 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Soc Human Dev & Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0169
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Time preference, or the extent to which people discount future benefits in favor of immediate benefits, might represent an important determinant of preventive health behavior, but the little research thus far on this association has yielded mixed results. This study examined the association between future time preference and use of genetic counseling for BRCA1/2 testing and how this association may differ from the relationship between future time preference and mammography screening and self-breast examination. Experimental Design: A health system-based case-control study with a nested cross-sectional survey. Eight hundred women who saw a primary care physician in the University of Pennsylvania Health System in the 3 years before the study, of whom 234 had undergone BRCA1/2 counseling (cases) and of whom 566 had not (controls). Results: Placing a relatively greater value on future benefits than present benefits was strongly associated with use of BRCA1/2 counseling [odds ratio (OR), 3.0 for one-point increase in future time preference; 95% confidence intervals (0), 1.9-4.9]. Future time preference was weakly associated with adherence to annual mammography (OR, 1.3; 95% Cl, 0.81-2.2), and was not associated with monthly self-breast examination (OR, 1.03; 95% Cl, 0.75-1.4). A stronger future orientation was seen in women who had higher levels of education (P = 0.0021) or income (P = 0.0011). Conclusion: Time preference is strongly associated with use of BRCA1/2 counseling. Time preference is more weakly associated with mammography adherence and is not associated with breast self-examination. This variation may reflect the degree to which the behavior is seen as related to future risk.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 960
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cancer-preventive isothiocyanates: dichotomous modulators of oxidative stress
    Zhang, YS
    Li, J
    Tang, L
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2005, 38 (01) : 70 - 77
  • [22] Bidirectional signaling of mammary epithelium and stroma: implications for breast cancer-preventive actions of dietary factors
    Su, Ying
    Shankar, Kartik
    Rahal, Omar
    Simmen, Rosalia C. M.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 22 (07): : 605 - 611
  • [23] Role of Dietary Cancer-Preventive Phytochemicals in Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells
    Kumar G.
    Farooqui M.
    Rao C.V.
    Current Pharmacology Reports, 2018, 4 (4) : 326 - 335
  • [24] In vitro digestibility of the cancer-preventive soy peptides lunasin and BBI
    Park, Jae Ho
    Jeong, Hyung Jin
    Lumen, Ben O. de
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2007, 55 (26) : 10703 - 10706
  • [25] A New Score for Quantifying Adherence to a Cancer-Preventive Mediterranean Diet
    Djuric, Zora
    Rifkin, Samara
    NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 74 (02): : 579 - 591
  • [26] Natural occurrence of cancer-preventive geranylgeranoic acid in medicinal herbs
    Shidoji, Y
    Ogawa, H
    JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH, 2004, 45 (06) : 1092 - 1103
  • [27] A 2-VALUE MODEL OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH BEHAVIOR
    KRISTIANSEN, CM
    BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 7 (03) : 173 - 183
  • [28] Preventive health behaviors and familial breast cancer
    Madlensky, L
    Vierkant, RA
    Vachon, CM
    Pankratz, VS
    Cerhan, JR
    Vadaparampil, ST
    Sellers, TA
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (10) : 2340 - 2345
  • [29] Genotoxicity and toxicity of the potential cancer-preventive agent polyphenon E
    Chang, PY
    Mirsalis, J
    Riccio, ES
    Bakke, JP
    Lee, PS
    Shimon, J
    Phillips, S
    Fairchild, D
    Hara, Y
    Crowell, JA
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2003, 41 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [30] Structural genomics of cancer-preventive phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway enzymes
    Kim, Wanyeon
    Yang, Hee Jung
    Yun, Young Ju
    Kim, Young Ha
    Kwon, TaeWoo
    Kang, ChulHee
    Youn, BuHyun
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24