Value for the future and breast cancer-preventive health behavior

被引:16
|
作者
Levy, Andrea Gurmankin
Micco, Ellyn
Putt, Mary
Armstrong, Katrina
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Community Based Res, Boston, MA 02446 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Soc Human Dev & Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0169
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Time preference, or the extent to which people discount future benefits in favor of immediate benefits, might represent an important determinant of preventive health behavior, but the little research thus far on this association has yielded mixed results. This study examined the association between future time preference and use of genetic counseling for BRCA1/2 testing and how this association may differ from the relationship between future time preference and mammography screening and self-breast examination. Experimental Design: A health system-based case-control study with a nested cross-sectional survey. Eight hundred women who saw a primary care physician in the University of Pennsylvania Health System in the 3 years before the study, of whom 234 had undergone BRCA1/2 counseling (cases) and of whom 566 had not (controls). Results: Placing a relatively greater value on future benefits than present benefits was strongly associated with use of BRCA1/2 counseling [odds ratio (OR), 3.0 for one-point increase in future time preference; 95% confidence intervals (0), 1.9-4.9]. Future time preference was weakly associated with adherence to annual mammography (OR, 1.3; 95% Cl, 0.81-2.2), and was not associated with monthly self-breast examination (OR, 1.03; 95% Cl, 0.75-1.4). A stronger future orientation was seen in women who had higher levels of education (P = 0.0021) or income (P = 0.0011). Conclusion: Time preference is strongly associated with use of BRCA1/2 counseling. Time preference is more weakly associated with mammography adherence and is not associated with breast self-examination. This variation may reflect the degree to which the behavior is seen as related to future risk.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 960
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value for the future and preventive health behavior
    Chapman, GB
    Brewer, NT
    Coups, EJ
    Brownlee, S
    Leventhal, H
    Leventhal, EA
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2001, 7 (03) : 235 - 250
  • [2] CANCER-PREVENTIVE FOODS AND INGREDIENTS
    CARAGAY, AB
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 46 (04) : 65 - 68
  • [3] Honey as a cancer-preventive agent
    Orsolic, N
    Basic, I
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2004, 106 (04) : 397 - 401
  • [4] Retinoids as cancer-preventive agents
    Sankaranarayanan, R
    Mathew, B
    PRINCIPLES OF CHEMOPREVENTION, 1996, (139): : 47 - 59
  • [5] Breast cancer-preventive behaviors: exploring Iranian women's experiences
    Khazaee-Pool, Maryam
    Montazeri, Ali
    Majlessi, Fereshteh
    Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi
    Nedjat, Saharnaz
    Shojaeizadeh, Davoud
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [6] Breast cancer-preventive behaviors: exploring Iranian women’s experiences
    Maryam Khazaee-Pool
    Ali Montazeri
    Fereshteh Majlessi
    Abbas Rahimi Foroushani
    Saharnaz Nedjat
    Davoud Shojaeizadeh
    BMC Women's Health, 14
  • [7] Production of the Cancer-Preventive Glucoraphanin in Tobacco
    Mikkelsen, Michael Dalgaard
    Olsen, Carl Erik
    Halkier, Barbara Ann
    MOLECULAR PLANT, 2010, 3 (04) : 751 - 759
  • [8] Lunasin: A cancer-preventive soy peptide
    de Lumen, BO
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2005, 63 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [9] Cancer-preventive activities of tocopherols and tocotrienols
    Ju, Jihyeung
    Picinich, Sonia C.
    Yang, Zhihong
    Zhao, Yang
    Suh, Nanjoo
    Kong, Ah-Ng
    Yang, Chung S.
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2010, 31 (04) : 533 - 542
  • [10] Cancer-preventive effects of sunscreens are uncertain
    Vainio, H
    Bianchini, F
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2000, 26 (06) : 529 - 531