Sensitivity analysis in lightning protection risk management

被引:4
|
作者
Farkas, Tekla D. [1 ]
Szedenik, Norbert [1 ]
Kiss, Istvan [1 ]
机构
[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Power Engn, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Lightning protection; Risk; Sensitivity analysis; Standardization;
D O I
10.1016/j.elstat.2012.12.040
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The total risk R can be expressed by the following equation: R = NPL, where N is the number of dangerous events, P is the probability of damage and L measures the amount of loss. These parameters can be regarded as macroparameters in the sense that they can be given as a function of additional parameters (microparameters). Methods of calculation, check and refinement of parameter values have always been general themes of the standardization. The comparison of standards IEC 62305-2:2006 Ed. 1 and IEC 62305-2:2010 Ed. 2 is a good example of these efforts, as changes underwent in the determination of the collection area of service and the value of some parameters, moreover new parameters were introduced in order to break existent parameters into more components. Though the international standard contains the value of parameters, it does not give any information about the procedure how these values were determined, nor about the theoretical considerations behind. Therefore it is proper to ask whether the changes of a given parameter value or introduction of a new parameter make radical changes in resulting risk value or not. In this study sensitivity analysis was used to investigate how the individual macro- and micro parameters influence the risk. Moreover it was determined whether or not new parameters and calculations have an effect on the importance of the respective components of the resulting risk. The sensitivity analysis was done for two case studies in the standard, a country house and an office building respectively, with both editions of the standard. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 585
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIGHTNING PROTECTION
    STEVENS, M
    MEASUREMENTS & CONTROL, 1994, (166): : 127 - 129
  • [22] Analysis of effect of resistive lightning protection terminal on lightning return stroke current
    Chia, DKL
    Liew, AC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2005, 20 (03) : 2307 - 2314
  • [23] LIGHTNING PROTECTION
    SOPER, SJ
    ELECTRONICS AND POWER, 1980, 26 (02): : 148 - 148
  • [24] A study of rational lightning protection measures for power distribution lines based on lightning risk evaluation
    Yoshida Y.
    Imada T.
    Ishimoto K.
    Asakawa A.
    Yoshida, Yuichi (yuichi-y@criepi.denken.or.jp), 1600, Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (137): : 460 - 468
  • [25] Lightning research and lightning protection technologies
    Pack, Stephan
    Piantini, Alexandre
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 113 : 1 - 2
  • [26] Special Issue: Lightning and Lightning Protection
    Zeng, Rong
    HIGH VOLTAGE, 2016, 1 (01): : 1 - 1
  • [27] Lightning Protection and Current Lightning Research
    Baumann, Michael
    Franchetti, Harald
    ELEKTROTECHNIK UND INFORMATIONSTECHNIK, 2010, 127 (05): : A42 - A42
  • [28] EMC investigations and real lightning risk of fire protection systems
    Sowa, Andrzej
    Wiater, Jaroslaw
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2007, 83 (09): : 88 - 90
  • [29] Reduction of NaTech Risk Due to Lightning by the Use of Protection Systems
    Necci, Amos
    Antonioni, Giacomo
    Cozzani, Valerio
    Borghetti, Alberto
    Nucci, Carlo Alberto
    LP2013 - 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON LOSS PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROMOTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, VOLS I AND II, 2013, 31 : 763 - 768
  • [30] Lightning Protection of High-Risk Installations: Petrochemical Plants
    Galván Diego, Arturo
    Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2021, 780 : 173 - 201