Microbeam Studies of Soft X-ray Induced Bystander Cell Killing Using Microbeam X-ray Cell Irradiation System at CRIEPI

被引:11
|
作者
Tomita, Masanori [1 ]
Kobayashi, Katsumi [2 ,3 ]
Maeda, Munetoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Res Inst Elect Power Ind, Radiat Safety Res Ctr, Tokyo 2018511, Japan
[2] High Energy Accelerator Res Org KEK, Res Serv Off, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050801, Japan
[3] High Energy Accelerator Res Org KEK, Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050801, Japan
关键词
X-ray microbeam; Bystander Response; Low dose radiation; Target irradiation; Cell death; CHARGED-PARTICLE MICROBEAM; LOW-DOSE HYPERSENSITIVITY; DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; HUMAN FIBROBLASTS; IN-VIVO; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; IONIZING-RADIATION; NITRIC-OXIDE; INDUCTION; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1269/jrr.11055
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The radiation induced bystander response is defined as a response in cells which have not been directly targeted by radiation, but which are in the neighborhood of cells which have been directly exposed. In many cases, the bystander response is saturated with increasing dose and is observed when only one cell in a population is targeted by high-LET particle radiations or ultrasoft X-rays (278 eV). However, in our studies using synchrotron X-ray microbeams (5.35 keV), the bystander cell killing effect in normal human fibroblast WI-38 cells had a parabolic relationship to the irradiating dose and was detected if 5 or more cell nuclei were irradiated. To evaluate the feature of the X-ray-induced bystander cell killing effect at a wider dose range and the existence of photon energy dependence, the effects were assessed by irradiating cell nuclei in confluent WI-38 cells with Al-K X-ray microbeams (1.49 keV). The surviving fraction decreased when only a single cell nucleus was irradiated, suggesting the minimal number of targeted cells to induce the effect may depend on the energy of photons used. In this study, we found that the bystander cell killing effect showed a biphasic relationship to the irradiating dose. The decrease in bystander cell survival at the doses higher than 0.23 Gy was partially suppressed between 2.3 and 7.0 Gy, followed by level-off around 90% above 14 Gy, suggesting that the X-ray-induced bystander response is dose dependent. In addition, NO is one of chief initiators/mediators of the effect at least 0.47 Gy.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 488
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] X-RAY MICROBEAM STUDIES OF FRACTURE SURFACES IN ALUMINA
    GUARD, RW
    ROMO, PC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1965, 48 (01) : 7 - &
  • [23] Revolutionary x-ray microbeam delivery system for MicroXRF
    Yun, Wenbing
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [24] A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED X-RAY MICROBEAM SYSTEM FOR ARTICULATORY STUDIES
    FUJIMURA, O
    ABBS, JH
    THOMPSON, MA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (05) : 674 - 674
  • [25] A laboratory X-ray microbeam for combined X-ray diffraction and fluorescence measurements
    Rouziere, S.
    Jourdanneau, E.
    Kasmi, B.
    Joly, P.
    Petermann, D.
    Albouy, P. A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 2010, 43 : 1131 - 1133
  • [26] Microstructure of a solid oxide fuel cell by microbeam X-ray diffraction
    Nozaki, Hiroshi
    Matsuo, Hidehito
    Hayashi, Yujiro
    Kadoura, Hiroaki
    Fujita, Satoru
    MATERIALS LETTERS, 2020, 277
  • [27] Study of the X-ray microbeam for scanning microscopes
    Iketaki, Y
    Horikawa, Y
    Mochimaru, S
    Nagai, K
    Kiyokura, T
    Oshima, M
    Yagishita, A
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY AND RELATED PHENOMENA, 1996, 80 : 353 - 356
  • [28] The Race to X-ray Microbeam and Nanobeam Science
    Ice, Gene E.
    Budai, John D.
    Pang, Judy W. L.
    SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6060) : 1234 - 1239
  • [29] MICROBEAM X-RAY DIFFRACTION MEASUREMENT OF STRAIN
    Noyan, I. C.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2002, 58 : C24 - C24
  • [30] MOSFET dosimetry of an X-ray microbeam.
    Rosenfeld, AB
    Kaplan, GI
    Kron, T
    Allen, BJ
    Dilmanian, A
    Orion, I
    Ren, B
    Lerch, MLF
    Holmes-Siedle, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1999, 46 (06) : 1774 - 1780