Current State of Single-Port Transumbilical Surgery in Urology: Challenges and Applications

被引:14
|
作者
Garcia-Mediero, J. M. [1 ]
Cabrera, P. M. [1 ]
Caceres, F. [1 ]
Mateo, E. [1 ]
Garcia-Tello, A. [1 ]
Angulo, J. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Europea Madrid, Hosp Univ Getafe, Fdn Invest Biomed, Serv Madrileno Salud, Madrid, Spain
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2013年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Urology; Single-port; Transumbilical approach; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; SITE SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; INCISION; DONOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2012.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Laparoscopic surgery in urology is considered to be an important advance, although it is not exempt from some morbidity associated to the use of multiple trocars and specifically to the extraction of the specimen. In order to decrease this morbidity and improve esthetics, other techniques are being developed, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). It is aimed to review the current status. of laparoendoscopic single site surgery in urology. Acquisition of evidence: A nonsystematic review has been carried out by means of the bibliographic search using the terms LESS and Urology from 2007 to 2012. The current LESS experience in urology is described, and its principal indications and the different single site devices and instruments available on the market are described. Synthesis of evidence: LESS surgery arose as one more step in the constant evolution of minimally invasive surgery in an attempt to improve esthetics, reduce surgical trauma and decrease pain and the post-operative complications associated to the conventional laparoscopy with multiple trocars. Since it was first described in 2007, the experience has been increasing exponentially and the LESS technique, whether assisted or not by robot, is becoming consolidated for a large spectrum of urological indications (both in oncological and reconstructive surgery) on a much greater scale than the NOTES technique. Even though most of the existing data are not randomized and very rarely comparative, with the selection bias that this represents, it seems clear that the esthetic benefit and analgesic control associated to the LESS surgery is real and reproducible. The complications associated to it are greater in cases of major oncology surgery and are due more to the technique itself then to the approach. Conclusions: Although the real benefit of the LESS surgery in urology cannot be appropriately quantified, the cosmetic improvement, less pain and greater patient satisfaction with their wound are clear. Appropriate training in this type of procedures in centers having large volumes and the continuous technical improvements in the instrumental development by the biomedical industry has resulted in the fact that the transumbilical LESS technique in urology has been born to stay.(c) 2012 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Lee, Jae Im
    Lee, Yoon Suk
    Lee, In Kyu
    Park, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Sang Kuon
    Kang, Won Kyung
    Cho, Hyeon-Min
    You, Young Kyuong
    Oh, Seong Taek
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (11): : 2765 - 2769
  • [42] Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases
    Hyung Jin Kim
    Jae Im Lee
    Yoon Suk Lee
    In Kyu Lee
    Jung Hyun Park
    Sang Kuon Lee
    Won Kyung Kang
    Hyeon-Min Cho
    Young Kyuong You
    Seong Taek Oh
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 2765 - 2769
  • [43] Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a pig model
    Boylu, Ugur
    Oommen, Mathew
    Thomas, Raju
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (05) : 686 - 690
  • [44] Gasless single-port access endoscopic surgery in urology: Minimum incision endoscopic surgery, MIES
    Kihara, Kazunori
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Koga, Fumitaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (10) : 791 - 800
  • [45] Initial Experience with Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery by Use of a Homemade Transumbilical Port in Urology
    Lee, Seok Young
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Park, Hae Young
    Lee, Tchun Yong
    Park, Sung Yul
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (09) : 613 - 618
  • [46] Single-port laparoscopic surgery in gynecology-current status
    Kondo, William
    Ribeiro, Reitan
    Zomer, Monica Tessmann
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2012, 9 (04) : 383 - 391
  • [47] Comparison of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fourth-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Ye, Guanxiong
    Qin, Yong
    Xu, Shengqian
    Wu, Chengjun
    Wang, Shi
    Pan, Debiao
    Wang, Xinmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (05): : 7746 - 7753
  • [48] Onset of a Training Program for Single-Port Laparoscopic Urology
    Caceres, F.
    Cabrera, P. M.
    Mateo, E.
    Andres, G.
    Lista, F.
    Garcia-Tello, A.
    Angulo, J. C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2012, 36 (07): : 418 - 424
  • [49] Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology 'What is Now Proved was Only Once Imagined'
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    White, Wesley M.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 145 : 324 - 325
  • [50] Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology
    Humphrey, John E.
    Canes, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 416 - 428