Current State of Single-Port Transumbilical Surgery in Urology: Challenges and Applications

被引:14
|
作者
Garcia-Mediero, J. M. [1 ]
Cabrera, P. M. [1 ]
Caceres, F. [1 ]
Mateo, E. [1 ]
Garcia-Tello, A. [1 ]
Angulo, J. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Europea Madrid, Hosp Univ Getafe, Fdn Invest Biomed, Serv Madrileno Salud, Madrid, Spain
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2013年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Urology; Single-port; Transumbilical approach; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; SITE SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; INCISION; DONOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2012.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Laparoscopic surgery in urology is considered to be an important advance, although it is not exempt from some morbidity associated to the use of multiple trocars and specifically to the extraction of the specimen. In order to decrease this morbidity and improve esthetics, other techniques are being developed, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). It is aimed to review the current status. of laparoendoscopic single site surgery in urology. Acquisition of evidence: A nonsystematic review has been carried out by means of the bibliographic search using the terms LESS and Urology from 2007 to 2012. The current LESS experience in urology is described, and its principal indications and the different single site devices and instruments available on the market are described. Synthesis of evidence: LESS surgery arose as one more step in the constant evolution of minimally invasive surgery in an attempt to improve esthetics, reduce surgical trauma and decrease pain and the post-operative complications associated to the conventional laparoscopy with multiple trocars. Since it was first described in 2007, the experience has been increasing exponentially and the LESS technique, whether assisted or not by robot, is becoming consolidated for a large spectrum of urological indications (both in oncological and reconstructive surgery) on a much greater scale than the NOTES technique. Even though most of the existing data are not randomized and very rarely comparative, with the selection bias that this represents, it seems clear that the esthetic benefit and analgesic control associated to the LESS surgery is real and reproducible. The complications associated to it are greater in cases of major oncology surgery and are due more to the technique itself then to the approach. Conclusions: Although the real benefit of the LESS surgery in urology cannot be appropriately quantified, the cosmetic improvement, less pain and greater patient satisfaction with their wound are clear. Appropriate training in this type of procedures in centers having large volumes and the continuous technical improvements in the instrumental development by the biomedical industry has resulted in the fact that the transumbilical LESS technique in urology has been born to stay.(c) 2012 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preliminary results of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Fumagalli U.
    Verrusio C.
    Elmore U.
    Massaron S.
    Rosati R.
    Updates in Surgery, 2010, 62 (2) : 105 - 109
  • [22] Single-port transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy: a new standard?
    Jacob, D. A.
    Raakow, R.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (27) : 1363 - 1367
  • [23] Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Talamini, Susan
    Vigneswaran, Hari T.
    Wilson, Jessica O.
    Crivellaro, Simone
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 897 - 905
  • [24] Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology
    Ryan W. Dobbs
    Whitney R. Halgrimson
    Susan Talamini
    Hari T. Vigneswaran
    Jessica O. Wilson
    Simone Crivellaro
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 897 - 905
  • [25] Single-Port Laparoscopically Assisted Transumbilical Ultraminilaparotomic Myomectomy
    Kang, Jun Hyeok
    Lee, Doo Haeng
    Lee, Jung Hun
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) : 945 - 950
  • [26] THE EXPERIENCE OF TRANSUMBILICAL SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Ma, Lulin
    Qiu, Min
    Zhang, Shudong
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A201 - A201
  • [27] Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report
    Guo Wei
    Zhang Zhong-tao
    Han Wei
    Li Jian-she
    Jin Lan
    Liu Jun
    Zhao Xiao-mu
    Wang Yu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (23) : 2463 - 2464
  • [28] Therapeutic effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery versus triple-port laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cyst
    Zhang, Yihai
    Shi, Li
    Li, Chunfu
    Zhang, Bing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (12): : 14023 - 14030
  • [29] Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery
    Kim, Hyung Ook
    Yoo, Chang Hak
    Lee, Sung Ryol
    Son, Byung Ho
    Park, Yong Lai
    Shin, Jun Ho
    Kim, Hungdai
    Han, Won Kon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 82 (03): : 172 - 178
  • [30] Current status of robotic single-port colonic surgery
    Bae, Sung Uk.
    Jeong, Woon Kyung
    Baek, Seong Kyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (01):